logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Judith Butler

Undoing Gender

Nonfiction | Essay Collection | Adult | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Index of Terms

Inclusion/Exclusion

The processes of inclusion and exclusion are critically intertwined in Butler’s work, as the process by which one is included is often the same process by which an other is excluded. These terms rely heavily on the idea of norms and normalization, as norms are the foundation on which a subject is either included or excluded. The primary inclusion Butler discusses in the text is that of the “human,” since inclusion or exclusion can radically change the way a subject is viewed and treated in the world. However, in more specific areas, inclusion can be exchanged with intelligibility, and exclusion can be exchanged with unintelligibility. A critical argument in the text is Butler’s assertion that no new genders need to be created—they only need to be included, which will take the appearance of adding “new” genders. In essence, the need is for new terms and understandings that allow genders outside the binary to be integrated into those who are included.

Norms/Normalization

Norms are difficult to locate and define in Butler’s work as they use the term in multiple contexts. Norms are commonly understood as rules of social etiquette or behavior, but they take on a broader and more abstract meaning when applied to gender and sexuality. Butler often uses the terms “legibility” or “intelligibility” to discuss norms, as they are the formative basis on which any discourse can occur. For example, terms like “masculine,” “feminine,” “man,” and “woman” all rely on binary norms of gender and sex. Butler acknowledges the difficulty of entering a discussion in which one tries to discuss a gender performance other than “masculine” or “feminine,” resulting in the need to discuss “combinations” of the two. This semantic reliance on norms highlights the challenges inherent in analyzing normalization, which is the process by which something is either enforced as a norm or becomes introduced as a norm.

Oedipal Conflict/ Oedipalization

The Oedipal conflict is an idea proposed by Sigmund Freud based on Sophocles’s Oedipus Rex (c. 429 BCE), in which Oedipus murders his father and marries his mother. Freud proposed that the Oedipal conflict—the desire to supplant the father and have sex with the mother—is formative in children’s development, allowing them to see themselves in the role of one parent while seeking a replacement for the other. This dynamic is specific to boys, while girls are assumed to undergo the same process in wanting to become their mothers and sleep with their fathers. Butler questions the Oedipal conflict throughout the collection, noting how it relies on the assumption of sexual difference, binary/complementary gender, and incest to achieve an aim that is rarely met. The Oedipal conflict is a major source of discourse in psychoanalysis, and it has been criticized through the lenses of queer, gender, and feminist theory, largely in the rigid way it proposes childhood development.

Performativity

Performativity is often viewed in a derogatory light, meaning “not real” or “pretend.” However, in gender and sexuality, performativity is a means by which ideas and patterns of behavior are repeated and recreated by individual actors. For example, a common performance of masculinity is restraining one’s emotions. When a man restrains his emotions, he is performing masculinity, but this performance is itself a repetition of the masculinity he has seen and internalized from social norms. As such, the norm is not the repetition or the internalization, but a broader regulation that maintains and enforces the need for the performance. Performativity is the real expression of an individual’s identity, and it is the primary way for theorists to identify how norms operate across a society.

Recognition and Desire

Butler integrates Spinoza’s idea of desire as the desire to persist with Hegel’s conception of desire: a desire for recognition. The result is Butler’s use of recognition and desire as synonymous terms, indicating the need for recognition in order to live a “viable” life. Recognition is afforded a more distinct definition as the interaction between the subject and the other, in which the subject understands itself through the recognition of the other. The reason that this dynamic is crucial to Butler’s argument is the need for intelligibility in recognition. If the subject is not intelligible, it then cannot be recognized by the other, and if the other is unintelligible, the subject cannot begin the process of recognition. The result is that marginalized people are “unrecognizable,” defeating immediately their desire for recognition and their ability to persist.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text