logo

62 pages 2 hours read

Elif Shafak

There Are Rivers in the Sky

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Interconnected and Cyclical Nature of Life

Spanning different eras, locations, and circumstances, the stories of the three protagonists in There Are Rivers in the Sky nevertheless contain a number of parallels and connections. Shafak primarily forges these connections using water, with each storyline taking place in proximity to a river and each protagonist sharing a strong, personal bond with water. A single drop of water, evaporated and reconstituted many times over centuries, witnesses the lives of all the novel’s central characters. Water thus serves as a motif representing the interconnectedness of all life and the cycles of loss and renewal that constitute history. 

Some of the connections that exist between Arthur, Narin, and Zaleekhah, are created in service of the plot. The same drop of water witnesses momentous events in each character’s life. Arthur’s birth and his arrival in Constantinople for the first time are both welcomed by the same droplet of water that is later intended for Narin’s baptism, and which she eventually consumes atop Mount Sinjar when fleeing ISIS. Zaleekhah sheds this droplet as a tear aboard the houseboat when she first moves in. Shafak uses the physical qualities of water to her metaphorical advantage. This droplet of water establishes a continuity between all these lives, making clear that—despite the racial and class hierarchies of Europe and the ethnic hostility promoted by groups like ISIS—all people share in the same human story. Shafak explicitly states this as well, likening the bonds between atoms in a water molecule to those between her characters: “Three characters connect across borders of time and place, and together they make this story” (19). 

Water is literally and symbolically equated with life itself throughout the story, emphasizing that seemingly disparate lives and cultures all share the same essential building block. The earliest of human civilizations emerged along the banks of rivers across the world, as Arthur notes in his speech at the Society of Biblical Archaeology. Millennia later, water continues to be as crucial to life as it was in Ashurbanipal’s time. Arthur, in 19th-century England, witnesses the death of a loved one due to cholera-infected water; he himself dies of cholera—an illness caused by lack of clean water—years later. These deaths make clear that clean, drinkable water is a necessity for civilization so that when Narin and her community are driven out from their homes and trapped on the slopes of Mount Sinjar by ISIS, who poison and withhold water from the Yazidis, the novel has already laid the groundwork to show that an attack on the supply of water is an attack on the very foundation of communal life. Even Zaleekhah, who lives a relatively comfortable life compared to the other protagonists, recognizes the real dangers of burying rivers in urban settlements. Just as the story of humans began with water, Shafak begins her story in Mesopotamia to underline the intrinsic link between water and human life. She follows this connection throughout the different timelines, using the necessity of water to illustrate the continuity and interconnectedness of human stories across vast geographical and temporal distances. 

Shafak further explores the interconnected and cyclical nature of life through the repetition of patterns in history. The Assyrians were famed for their conquests, forcing people to migrate from their homelands when the latter were annexed into the empire. Millennia later, persecuted groups like the Yazidis are continually on the move, forced out of their homes for a variety of complex, sociopolitical reasons rooted in violence and power. Again, rivers symbolize these historical continuities. The Thames, dirty and polluted in Arthur’s time, reemerges as a sparkling picture of health in Zaleekhah’s, even as other rivers are buried and neglected in cities across the world. Even the specific circumstances surrounding the 2014 genocidal massacre that Narin survives echoes the ones that her great-great-grandmother Leila foretold in her time. By underlining and emphasizing the cyclical and interconnected nature of life throughout the narrative, Shafak primes the reader to take note of these similarities and repetitions throughout human history. The presence of water makes these patterns explicit while also serving as a medium to explore how human action and consequence are interconnected. By mirroring cycles in water and in history, Shafak attempts to bring attention to the consequences of allowing certain cycles of domination and violence to repeat themselves.

The Impact of Ancient Texts on Modern Lives

Two texts—one ancient and one that chronicles the ancient text’s discovery—play instrumental roles in the story. The Epic of Gilgamesh, an epic from ancient Mesopotamia and the oldest written text in human history, was discovered in the excavated library of Assyrian king Ashurbanipal. Deciphering this text becomes Arthur’s life’s work and thus directs a large portion of the action in the story. Arthur is introduced to the epic through Austen Henry Layard’s Nineveh and Its Remains, an account of the author’s travels and excavations through Mesopotamia, which culminated in his discovery of Ashurbanipal’s library. The text thus has repercussions not just within Shafak’s story but in the context of human history as well. Through the impact that these texts have on the lives of her characters, Shafak attempts to explore how and why ancient literature plays a foundational role in modern lives. 

Within the context of the story, the import of both texts is easily established. Arthur first encounters Nineveh and Its Remains in his school headmaster’s office, and when he finally gets a chance to read it at the printing press, it sets the stage for the rest of Arthur’s life. Arthur develops an interest in Nineveh and the ancient civilization it hosted while also learning that it is possible to dedicate one’s life to exploring history, as Layard did. Thus, when he later encounters The Epic of Gilgamesh in the British Museum, he is primed to see decoding it as his life’s work. Nineveh and Its Remains gives direction to Arthur’s interests, and The Epic of Gilgamesh becomes the recipient of this focus. The prominence of the texts in Arthur’s storyline is warranted, as he is the connective character in the book: Arthur moves between the Tigris and the Thames, linking the two rivers within the story. Moreover, his work on deciphering the cuneiform tablets allows it to be accessed and analyzed by the rest of the Western world. Nineveh and Its Remains serves as a connection to The Epic of Gilgamesh for Arthur; this facilitates Arthur serving as a connection between the ancient text and the modern world.

The intertextuality of the narrative itself further underlines the enduring impact of ancient literature. While Arthur’s storyline most prominently features the ancient epic, references to it appear in Narin’s and Zaleekhah’s storylines as well. Besma recounts Yazidi stories of an ancient flood to Narin, and these are reminiscent of the one Arthur encounters on the Flood Tablet. Nen runs a tattoo parlor named after a forgotten goddess from Mesopotamian times, tattoos exclusively in cuneiform, and owns a houseboat named after a line from The Epic of Gilgamesh. Besma’s enduring memory of Yazidi stories, as well as the resonance that Nen feels with an ancient script and an ancient text, display how even in modern times, people continue to derive meaning from ancient narratives. To Besma, stories of the flood are a way to understand and make sense of the cycles of change in life and human history. To Nen, Gilgamesh’s and Nisaba’s stories are affirmation of the universality of human experience throughout time. Shafak herself has drawn on the ancient text to shape her story, characters, and themes, and in doing so, she makes visible the degree to which this ancient story continues to structure modern culture. Through her narrative, Shafak underlines how ancient texts serve as both a glimpse into a time and place far removed and long gone and a reminder of the similarities between humans across history.

Archaeology as Plunder

Shafak’s personal background makes her uniquely poised to explore the idea of cultural plunder in the context of her book. A Turkish British novelist, Shafak hails from the land that witnessed the ancient Mesopotamian civilizations and lives in the country responsible for excavating and preserving its artifacts. The multiplicity of perspectives afforded by this background allows Shafak to examine the cultural plunder committed by colonial archaeologists, who appropriated historical artifacts from around the world and brought them to Europe, where they became part of a Eurocentric narrative of world history.

Narin’s storyline, as it intersects with Arthur’s experiences in the past, offers a critical take on the subject. Besma, in particular, takes issue with the archaeological excavations that were carried out by the West in her land. She describes how the lamassus were carried away to Europe by historians and archaeologists during Leila’s time, bemoaning the fact that she has never seen one herself. Besma’s ire at the acquisitiveness of the West is validated by Arthur’s experiences with his employers on both of his trips to Nineveh. During the first, he is recalled home immediately after making what is deemed an important find, despite his pleas that his trip be extended; during the second, he is ordered to stay on until he makes a worthwhile discovery, despite his request to return home, citing hazardous health conditions. Both situations underline how, although the archaeological expeditions are fueled by a spurt of academic inquiry, gains and profitability are inextricably linked to the outcome of the work. This, ultimately, is prioritized above all else—both the people carrying out the archaeological work and the land and communities to whom the discoveries belong. Thus, artifacts and material history are taken away from native lands and native communities and used in the service of a colonialist narrative—in which civilization began in the Fertile Crescent but reached its apotheosis in the museums and salons of 19th-century Europe.

The character of Arthur is Shafak’s attempt to view this appropriative archeology in a sympathetic light. Unlike his employers, Arthur is motivated purely by a desire to learn more about a civilization and culture that genuinely fascinates him. Even before his trips to Nineveh, Arthur spends years deciphering the cuneiform tablets, undeterred by the meagre income and lack of fame and glory that it brings him. Upon his arrival in Nineveh, Arthur approaches his work and the communities around him with respect and humility. He befriends the Yazidis despite the widespread prejudice toward them, and over the course of his work, he is awed and humbled by both the enormity and the transience of the achievements of civilizations past. Arthur’s approach to archaeological work is rooted in curiosity and connection rather than appropriation and exploitation, even as he remains bound to this appropriative model through his employers and funding sources. He digs to learn more about a civilization and culture that he feels connected to, rather than to make discoveries that will make him rich and famous. This is also why as he learns more, he grows increasingly discomfited by the idea of artifacts populating homes, personal collections, and even museums in distant lands. By the end of Arthur’s short life, he grows increasingly convinced that it is wrong to take these artifacts away from the land and people whose ancestors created them. However, this does not dull his desire to learn more about the history and culture of the land, either. Through Arthur’s journey, Shafak attempts to posit that if rooted in curiosity, respect, and empathy, historical discovery and archaeological excavation is possible without the perpetuation of cultural plunder.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text