29 pages • 58 minutes read
Madame de La FayetteA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Princesse de Clèves begins with a flattering portrait of Henry II, who historically ruled France from 1547 until his death in 1559. The action of the book is set very late in the king’s reign. From her perspective in 1678, over a century later, Lafayette writes: “The monarch was courteous, handsome and fervent in love. […] Since he excelled at every sort of physical exercise, he made that his main occupation” (23).
Lafayette next details the members of Henri’s court, some of whom are important to the novel’s action. She describes the King’s wife, Queen Catherine de Medici, as beautiful but past her prime. The young Mary Stuart, known to history as Mary Queen of Scots (and throughout this novel as the Reine Dauphine), makes an appearance, as do the Duc de Guise and his two sons, one of whom, the Chevalier (or Knight) de Guise, plays a minor role in the narrative. The author also introduces two characters of prime narrative importance. One of these is the Prince de Clèves, who will lend his name to the title character in marriage; another is the superior Duc de Nemours, “nature’s masterpiece,” who will be Clèves’s chief rival for the title character’s affections. A third character, the Vidame de Chartres, plays a less central but still important role. Additionally, the author mentions Diane de Poitiers, known throughout the book as the Duchess de Valentinois. The Duchess was famously the King’s mistress, and the author notes that “she ruled him with an authority so absolute that she might be said to be mistress at once of his person and of the State” (26). All of these names correspond to names recorded in living history.
The author establishes rivalries between the Guises and the other central characters, as well as larger political rivalries between England and France, many of which are mediated by the powerful Duchess. The ritual of marriage is central to both the creation and healing of these rivalries; to this end, the King advises the dashing Duc de Nemours to pursue the hand of Elizabeth I, newly ascended to the English throne. The duke moves to Brussels to draw up his plans.
“There then appeared at court a beauty who attracted every eye; and it must be supposed that she exhibited true perfection, since she inspired awe in a place where people were so much accustomed to the sight of beauty,” Lafayette writes (29). This is Mademoiselle de Chartres, the central character. She is accompanied by Madame Chartres, her widowed mother and chief advisor.
Mme de Chartres draws up ambitious plans to match her daughter in marriage. Mlle de Chartres makes a great impression on the Chevalier de Guise, who is too poor to be considered a good match, and the Prince de Clèves, who is suitable but dull. Mme de Chartres finally settles on a higher-ranking member of the court. However, interference from the Duchess de Valentinois ruins the match. Consequently, Mlle de Chartres’s reputation is slightly spoiled, and the Prince de Clèves, suddenly elevated by the death of the Duc de Nevers, becomes the best possible match, and the marriage is arranged. It is apparent, however, that while the Prince dearly loves Mlle de Chartres, his love is not requited.
The Duc de Nemours returns to court from Brussels and meets Mlle de Chartres the night before she is set to become the Princess de Clèves. Their attraction to one another is plain to see, though not mentioned nor acted upon. Soon after the marriage, M. de Clèves evinces jealousy.
Mme Chartres falls ill and dies. On her deathbed, she warns her daughter against infidelity: “were there a single thing that might disturb the bliss to which I look forward on leaving this world, it would be to see you fall as other women have done” (59).
The princess experiences considerable self-doubt, and she and her husband take to the country. Soon after, her husband returns to Paris for a longer-than-expected stay. When he returns, he announces that he has an incredible story to tell, one that condemns a woman of the court named Mme de Tournon.
Lafayette begins by describing Henri II’s court in the most glittering terms: “At no time in France were splendor and refinement so brilliantly displayed” (23). Immediately Lafayette establishes the idea that appearances are very important. As we meet each member of Henri II’s court, they are described by their dress, their natural beauty or athleticism, their instrumental knowledge of warfare and history, and their decorous manners. Mme de Chartres warns, “If you judge by appearances in this place […] you will often be deceived, because what appears to be the case hardly ever is” (46). Yet appearance is important; the title character becomes her own greatest antagonist in part because of her internal struggle to maintain appearances among her peers.
Her mother guides her through the world of the court, and in this role her mother is both sharply observant and a little untrustworthy. Due to her youth and the laws of court decorum, Mlle de Chartres has very little say as to where she will appear or to whom she will be matched; everything is decided either by Mme de Chartres or by circumstance. When Mme de Chartres overreaches in matching her daughter to a high-placed aristocrat, her daughter pays the price by settling with a husband for whom she feels no affinity. We are told that Mme de Chartres is unusually candid with her daughter about matters of the heart (though the exact secrets she reveals are not written here), yet as she notices the friction between her daughter and her son-in-law, she cautions a type of self-deceit. In describing the King’s mistress to her daughter, for instance, she says that the King’s attachment to the Duchess would only have been virtuous “if she had loved the King with scrupulous fidelity, and if she had loved him for himself, without consideration of rank and fortune” (45). Rank and fortune were paramount considerations of Mme de Chartres’s matchmaking. Even on her deathbed, Mme de Chartres warns against the dangers of infidelity to the dull man she arranged as a match for her daughter.
Of course, the Prince plays his part in Mlle de Chartres’s predicament. He realizes well before the marriage that the arrangement will not be a happy one. Modern readers might imagine that none of the characters would be unhappy if allowed to act as fully autonomous beings, able to weigh personal options, live freely, and draw up marriage contracts according to their desire. Yet Lafayette has placed these characters in the French court of the 16th century, described here as a machine of undeniable and self-sustaining logic, into which each character must play their part with absolute fidelity or suffer consequence. Though it may be true that we are deceived by appearances at court, when appearances are this important and firmly established, noticing the deception may only cause pain.