42 pages • 1 hour read
Albert CamusA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Described as a medium-sized man around age 35, Bernard Rieux has broad shoulders and a rectangular face punctuated by dark eyes and a prominent jawline. The doctor’s steady gaze reflects his steadiness of character—making him an ideal narrator—as evinced by the attentive regularity with which he attends to his patients before, during, and after the plague hits Oran. The only person to whom Rieux devotes himself less than he should is his chronically ill wife; for this, he feels pangs of remorse, but his personal mission extends more to the community at large than to any one individual.
While puzzled by the dead rats around town, Rieux initially reacts with disbelief at the situation’s severity. As deaths begin multiply, however, Rieux realizes that he must act swiftly as an agent of change in convincing Oran’s officials to lose no time in closing the city. Preferring concise, direct communication, Rieux implores the city’s medical team not to prevaricate, to instead act decisively in this time of crisis. As Oran’s death toll rises, he works around the clock, never faltering in performing his duty, not out of heroism but out of “common decency.” Even upon understanding that his role is more about diagnosing than healing, Rieux does what he can to save Oranians’ lives. The doctor lives by the principle of telling only the unmitigated truth, this tenet fueling his refusal to provide Rambert details he seeks for an article, because he knows that Rambert lacks the authority to report the veracity of Oran’s situation. Again, out of principle, Rieux declines to provide Rambert documentation required to facilitate the journalist’s departure from Oran.
During a respectful debate, Rambert reproaches Rieux for following abstract principles at the expense of recognizing and experiencing human emotions. While the doctor cannot refute Rambert’s underlying belief in the power of love, he digs in his heels, ever-adherent to his atheist and humanist principles, which he shares with Tarrou, and which contrast with Paneloux’s unwavering faith in God.
As the plague intensifies and Rieux grows increasingly weary, he witnesses Tarrou’s and Paneloux’s deaths—among many others—and grows less dogmatic in his views as he considers leaving his realm of abstractions. He aspires to make a fresh start with his wife, who passes away prior to her return from the sanitarium. All tragedy notwithstanding, Rieux remains optimistic about humanity and resolves to write his chronicle of Oran’s plague in hopes that future generations won’t be blindsided by the inevitable plagues of the future.
The son of a prosecutor, Jean Tarrou spent his childhood and early youth in France. A gray-eyed man who enjoys a jaunt to the beach, Tarrou has traveled to Oran for reasons that remain undisclosed for much of the novel. Good-humored and frequently smiling, the mysterious visitor appears to be “an addict of all normal pleasures without being their slave” (12). Paradoxically pleased to have discovered a town as ugly as Oran, Tarrou finds the city’s obsession with commerce captivating. His ever-vigilant capacity to take in apparently trivial information translates into his “eccentricities of thought and expression” (13). Behind this curious marriage of normalcy and intrigue lies Tarrou’s seemingly bizarre habit of observing people and events around him and recording into his notebooks insignificant details that typically go unnoticed by others. These minutiae prove of utmost pertinence, however, and serve as the primary source material for Rieux’s chronicle of Oran’s plague. Furthermore, Tarrou clearly possesses the prescience to gauge the everyday objects and occurrences that in the long run bear significance. For example, he writes extensively about Oran’s trolleys, which later carry exhumed corpses from mass graves to the crematorium. Tarrou also takes delight in recording the curious actions of his elderly neighbor, who leans out of his window and spits on cats roaming the city.
As the plague intensifies in Oran, Tarrou outright rejects using prisoners to supplement the city’s overstretched labor teams. Likening forced prison labor to a death sentence, Tarrou expresses his disdain for the death penalty, a view on which he elaborates during his intimate conversation with Rieux prior to contracting and dying of plague. At Tarrou’s insistence, volunteer workers form a sanitary squad to support doctors’ and officials’ efforts to fight the plague.
Tarrou explains to Rieux that he became an enemy of all forms of injustice due to his father’s profession, claiming that only as a teenager did he begin to grasp his father’s role in handing down death sentences to criminals. Upon realizing that his father was a murderer, Tarrou left home and became an agitator, traveling the continent and fighting killing wherever he could. Considering himself a life-long carrier of plague, Tarrou sees it as his duty to rid himself of contagion by any means possible. Though a humanist and atheist like Rieux, Tarrou aspires to sainthood, and though a staunch believer in truth—he demands that Rieux tell him the unadorned truth about his health as he is dying—Tarrou nevertheless lies to Othon, telling the grieving man that his son died peacefully.
A small, determined journalist sent on assignment to Oran, Raymond Rambert is driven by his quest for personal happiness, to which he feels entitled as a veteran of the Spanish Civil War. When the plague erupts, Rambert pines for his wife back in Paris, to whom he desperately seeks to return once the city enters quarantine. Throughout the first half of the novel, Rambert, while concerned about the plague, cites his outsider status in Oran as the basis of his reluctance to join the fight against the disease.
Rambert first meets Rieux while requesting information for an article on the Arab population’s living and sanitary conditions. Despite Rieux’s refusal to provide details and his subsequent unwillingness to help Rambert escape Oran, the two men grow to respect each other. Even as the death toll mounts in Oran, Rambert continues to espouse the principle of individual happiness, arguing that a conglomeration of joyful individuals amounts to a happy society. As he awaits an opportunity to flee Oran with the aid of smugglers, the journalist feels compelled to support the sanitary squad. Finally, in a plot twist, just when Rambert’s escape is cleared, he decides to stay in Oran to work alongside the plague-fighters.
Joseph Grand, a middle-aged, lowly government clerk of scanty means, devotes his spare time to penning a novel, the first sentence of which he strives endlessly to perfect. Due to his inability to find the right words to justify his promotion, Grand has not advanced in his career, one fault for which his wife Jeanne left him. Steadfast in his love for her, Grand lives austerely and honorably, devoting his waking hours to accomplishing workplace duties and perfecting the first sentence of his literary opus.
In the spirit of being a good neighbor, Grand calls for Rieux’s help when Cottard attempts suicide. As the plague intensifies in Oran, Grand unflinchingly lends his support to the sanitary squad, despite his advanced age and faltering health. For this, Rieux qualifies Grand as the embodiment of quiet heroism behind the sanitary squad’s efforts.
An odd, secretive loner who lives in the same building as Grand, Cottard has no legitimate means of income. Out of momentary remorse and fear of police apprehension for a past crime, Cottard attempts suicide in the novel’s opening pages. Initially plagued by angst, Cottard ostensibly “blossoms”—according to Tarrou’s journals—during quarantine as he profits from the plague’s devastation by smuggling contraband substances.
Characterized by shifty behavior, Cottard superficially befriends Tarrou and Rieux for a time, though he declines to join the sanitary squad. Ultimately concerned with his own interests, Cottard grows increasingly paranoid as the plague wanes, knowing his shady business dealings will come to an end and that authorities will seek him out. As the novel closes, a fully demented Cottard is led away from his apartment by the police.
A well-educated, militant Jesuit priest, Father Paneloux enjoys widespread popularity in Oran, even among nonbelievers. Known for his intense personality and eloquent oratories, Paneloux participates in a week of prayer at the onset of quarantine. During his first high mass sermon, he evokes countless details regarding the plagues of history, deftly weaving rhetorical flourishes throughout his remarks as he reproaches his congregants’ lax religious beliefs, which he claims have caused God to strike Oran with plague.
After the death of Othon’s son, Paneloux delivers a second sermon in which he beckons Oranians to look beyond their visceral reactions to the boy’s senseless death and accept it as an act of God. While Paneloux remains devoted to following God’s will, he nevertheless demonstrates solidarity with the sanitary squad by helping them fight the plague. However, when he displays signs of illness, he refuses medical treatment, deeming his deteriorating condition the result of divine will, with which he refuses to intervene.
M. Othon is a local police magistrate known for his somber conservatism, evinced by his black garb and rule-following personality. His tall, thin frame topped with a bald head bearing tufts of hair on each side make him resemble “a well brought-up owl” (14). In the public sphere Othon always displays proper social graces in the company of his family, all the while withholding kind remarks from them. At times, he adopts a perfunctory, polite tone as he utters unkind comments to his “black mouse” of a wife and “performing poodle” children.
Othon’s personality undergoes a change after his young son dies from the plague. After being sent to the quarantine camp, Othon sheds his steely exterior as he gains awareness of the sanitary squad’s collaborative efforts to fight the disease. To the surprise of all involved, he later returns to the camp to honor his deceased son and to assist in the collective struggle. In the end, he dies of pestilence prior to putting his newfound sense of solidarity into action.
While not a part of the novel’s public sphere, Rieux’s longstanding patient is a constant presence in the novel. Having taken to his bed at the age of 50, this loquacious elderly man has spent the past 25 years there, engaged in the mindless, repetitive activity of transferring peas from one container to another. Having no interests whatsoever, the asthmatic remains oddly cheerful performing his silly, repetitive task. Despising watches, his temporal compass is rooted in the rhythmic, regulated ritual of pea-counting; because he instinctively senses how long it takes to make a full transfer of peas, he knows that after 15 pans are completed, it is mealtime.
Despite his ostensibly ridiculous manner of whiling away time, the asthmatic patient—the absurd incarnate—delivers simple but perspicacious comments throughout the narrative. For example, he notes that “they’re coming out” (4) when the rats first appear around town. Though not part of the resistance, he innately understands what motivates Tarrou, of whose death he remarks: “It’s always the best who go. That’s how life is. But he was a man who knew what he wanted” (149). Whereas he tangibly “does” very little, Rieux’s elderly patient claims that he truly knows how to live despite his near inability to breathe independently; without medical intervention, his life’s very source is jeopardized. Contradictorily—and absurdly—he strives for longevity in his nonactivity. He rightly notes that after the reopening of Oran, its people remain largely unchanged. This fount of quirky wisdom represents traditional common sense and stands in juxtaposition to Oran’s officials and populace at large, who are often blind to reality.
By Albert Camus