63 pages • 2 hours read
Wes MooreA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The author struggles to answer why he and Wes led such different lives. However, he does believe that if there is one thing that sets them apart, it was the people in their lives. Moore credits his community—his mother, his grandmother, his peers and chain of command at Valley Forge, and so on—with providing the support, structure, and encouragement that enabled him to make better choices, hold himself accountable for those choices, and discover new opportunities. He argues that these mentors, “who kept pushing [him] to see more than what was directly in front of [him]” (179), made all the difference in his life. Even the decisions he initially resented, like the forced relocation to military school, were made because of his family’s belief in a successful future for him.
The other Wes Moore was decidedly less fortunate in this arena. His primary mentor figure was his older brother Tony. Although Tony was older, he grew up in the same circumstances as Wes. He also lacked a strong mentor figure, and he too fell into the cycle of drugs and violence; he could not exemplify a mature life built upon responsibility and integrity because no one had ever taught those things to him. Instead, Tony passed down the hard-earned lessons he learned on the street. Wes had no positive role models to demonstrate accountability or morality; he had no one to guide him to make better choices. It’s implied that when he did find resources through the Job Corps, it was too little too late—he was already stuck in a certain way of thinking.
The author juxtaposes his youth with Wes’s to argue that “young boys are more likely to believe in themselves if they know that there’s someone, somewhere, who shares that belief” (28). This idea drives his charitable work; in the paperback edition of the book he includes pages of different mentorship organizations that could possibly be the one difference in a young person’s life that guides them toward fulfillment rather than disappointment.
Crucial to Moore’s point and call to action is the notion that there are pivotal moments and decisions in a person’s life that sets them on a particular trajectory. This is what makes the subtitle of the book problematic (“one name, two fates”) because the inclusion of “fate” implies that each Wes Moores’s lot in life was destined and set without their stir. However, the author argues that there were deliberate choices made in his life (some beyond his control) that were critical in the difference between himself and the other Wes Moore. He clearly argues in the Epilogue that it isn’t necessarily one moment or choice that determines a person’s success but a series of points or crossroads. By following the stories of both men, an observer could pinpoint crucial differences in the choices each made that made their paths so divergent. Because their background was so similar and yet their outcomes so different, this proves that their decisions were they key determining factor in the outcome of their lives.
Near the end of the book Moore writes that moving to different places was not what made the difference in his life. Rather, it was a change in “thinking” that improved him for the better. He was given a few better chances based on “location” (e.g., moving to the Bronx, switching to a more affluent private school and then military school, studying abroad in South Africa), but it was only once he embraced the opportunities being offered to him that he began making positive and purposeful life decisions.
By contrast, the other Wes Moore’s story draws a clear connection between location and mindset. Wes was given a chance to build important skills and start a new life for himself after entering Job Corps, but he couldn’t stay there forever. After completing his training, he had to make the intentional choice to continue living a “legal, safer” life beyond the center’s walls—but he couldn’t stay the course. As soon as he returned to the streets of Baltimore, he fell right back into that street hustler mindset. The book even implies that Wes believes himself to be a product of his environment and others’ expectations, and this sort of learned helplessness suggests he allowed his location to determine his life rather than his own choices.