logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Guy de Maupassant

The Necklace

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1884

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.

Background

Literary Context: Realism

De Maupassant’s “The Necklace” is a classic example of literary realism, a movement that flourished in France in the 19th century. Literary realism focuses on realistic characters and settings, character development, plausible plot elements, and the depiction of social class.

Mathilde and Loisel are both highly realistic characters, as both have traits relatable to most people. While Mathilde is materialistic and vain, she also wants the most life has to offer her. Loisel, on the other hand, is more content and happier with his position in life. Both characters reflect basic human traits and needs. Mathilde’s character development is likewise familiar, as many readers can relate to the fact that difficult circumstances often provoke the most profound change in a person. The setting of the story is similarly realistic in that it is set in Paris and references specific streets and places in the city. De Maupassant’s use of imagery also shapes the realism of the setting, as readers can easily see themselves in the story and the lives of the characters.

The plot itself, while ultimately tragic and ironic, is highly plausible. Often the goal a person strives for ends up causing more harm than good. This fact is illustrated by Mathilde’s desire to rise in social class, which leads her further down the class structure in the end. Many readers seek the ideal and impossible and know that this pursuit at times leads them backward. Mathilde becomes even more relatable to the reader because of her fall. The idea of social class is so pivotal to the plot that, had it not existed, Mathilde’s struggle would have been avoided. Class structure exists both inside the story and out, so the reader is easily able to sympathize with Mathilde’s situation and her longing to do and be more.

Philosophical Context: Marxism

De Maupassant wrote at a time when the writings of Karl Marx and Marxist thinkers exerted a strong influence on literary culture. Marxist analyses seek to identify the role that social class plays in a text and how power is distributed among the characters. They also investigate the struggle within classes and how conflict is created. Social class has a strong effect on de Maupassant’s characters and how they behave and develop. Mathilde is shaped by her obsession with social class, as it is the center of who she is and what she wants from life. She resents the social class in which she was born, yet the economic arrangements and gender roles of the time leave her powerless to change it. Mathilde deludes herself about powerlessness, however, and fights to be part of the upper class in any way she can. This fight leads her to borrow the necklace to appear to be part of the class she envies so intensely. Of course, this necklace causes her to fall to the bottom of the class system.

Mathilde is in constant conflict with herself as she daydreams about the life she wishes she had but has no power to achieve. Her daydreams and emotional outbursts are outward showings of this internal struggle. Social class also creates conflict between Mathilde and her husband since Loisel wants his wife to be happy and sacrifices his money and power to help achieve it. Loisel is content with their middle-class life, yet he is willing to sacrifice it in an attempt to help Mathilde feel that she is part of the upper class. This sacrifice, while in vain, illustrates the conflict between the characters.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text