logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Ursula K. Le Guin

The Left Hand of Darkness

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1969

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Gender and Sexuality as Culturally Formative Forces

LeGuin’s depiction of a race of people without gender is at once revolutionary and deeply invested in notions of strict cultural divisions of people along normative gender lines. On Gethen, LeGuin suggests that the lack of static sexual organs and the ambivalent nature of the sexual anatomy an individual may develop during kemmer have resulted in a society without gender. LeGuin introduces the cisgendered male Genly, who comes from a patriarchal culture with a division of labor determined by gender roles, into the genderless society on Gethen to explore how and what elements of culture and civilization are informed by gender.

Although some critics interpret the Gethen people as progressively sexually fluid, LeGuin’s characterization of Gethen culture has also been criticized for conflating sexual anatomy with gender identity and for its heterosexual portrayal of sexual intimacy; Gethenian mates always assume discrete “male” and “female” identities during kemmer. This reduces the spectrum of both gender and sexual identities to the same binary that LeGuin seeks to criticize. LeGuin even represents gender and sexuality at once in the book through the yin/yang symbol, male and female, separated into hard demarcations of black and white but intertwined playfully. She does not allow for the gray areas described by a graduated spectrum. As such, LeGuin’s criticism focuses on patriarchy, and on the roots and influences of the oppression of those who identify as women by those who identify as men, rather than investigating how the full range of sexual and gender identities affect the formation of culture.

However, Gethenians do not conceive of their sexual or gender identities as binary, except in the sense that they either are or are not in kemmer. The Gethen are genderless, and when they separate into anatomic sexual roles, they do so cooperatively and with consent. Any Gethenian may develop the ability to become pregnant during kemmer, and LeGuin suggests that this equal capability results in a culture without a gendered division of labor or sexual violence. LeGuin posits that the erasure of sexual difference prevents sexual exploitation or sexism. No one stands to gain from the oppression of a particular sex, as any individual may at some point identify as the oppressed sex. The effects of this inherent equality characterize Gethenian culture, including accommodations for those experiencing kemmer, the diminished significance of monogamy, and the matriarchal tracing of lineage. By contrast, LeGuin portrays the patriarchy of Genly’s culture, which is meant as an analogue to Earth’s, as a power structure built on the division of labor, beginning with the sexual division of labor of insemination and pregnancy.

However, there are those among Gethen society viewed as “perverts” by the mainstream Gethenian culture, particularly those who maintain the consistent presence of sexual anatomy. Genly is perceived as someone who is always in a state of low-grade kemmer, which many on Gethen find horrible and strange. Similarly, Genly feminizes all Gethenians: He is unable to see them as fully male through his sexist point of view, despite his default use of he/him/his pronouns for all Gethen individuals, and unable to accept the total absence of a gender identity. In this way, LeGuin sets up a dynamic in which people of different identities should be treated with kindness and empathy, rather than with close attention to shades of difference. As Genly overcomes his prejudices and develops intimacy with Estraven, he realizes that Estraven’s sexual or gender identity is immaterial to their ability to understand, comfort, and teach one another, or to their ability to work toward a common goal.

Cultural Relativism Versus Colonization

The people of Gethen can scarcely believe that an advanced society such as the Ekumen can be real, existing as it does across a wide portion of the known galaxy, and the meeting of these two cultures invokes the troubling history of colonization on Earth. Through Genly’s experiences on Gethen, and through the Gethen experience of Genly, LeGuin posits that cultural relativism, rather than forced assimilation or occupation, best supports civilizational progress.

When asked what the Ekumen want with Gethen, Genly replies, “Material profit. Increase of knowledge. The augmentation of the complexity and intensity of the field of intelligent life. The enrichment of harmony and the greater glory of God. Curiosity. Adventure. Delight” (34). As abstractions, these sound like innocuous goals, but the history of colonization was itself founded on noble-sounding abstractions that melted in the face of brutality. Genly acknowledges this tradition by arriving alone and unarmed, risking everything in an open show of nonaggression. Nevertheless, aggression follows him in his attitude of resistance to the Gethen culture. He sometimes finds the lack of Gethen boundaries between male and female repulsive, ascribing feminine values to those he doesn’t like, and masculine values to those he does. Indeed, the early investigations performed by Genly and his fellow Ekumen describe the Gethen in animalistic terms, a very troubling repeat of Earth’s past, in which colonizers have historically dehumanized existing populations to justify their subjugation. In this way, Genly misses the point of his venture, which is to exchange values between the Ekumen and this new planet. His early attempts to convince the nations of Gethen to accept the Ekumen fail because he in turn fails to appreciate the nuances of their political and social behaviors. Genly attempts to convince the Gethenians with arguments based on his own values, rather than on theirs.

The success of Genly’s mission lies in his ability to reject colonization by cultural force in favor of the mutual benefits achieved by cultural relativism. To succeed in his goal, Genly must first transform himself through internal conflict. Estraven proves the catalyst for this conflict, and LeGuin comes very close to describing their time on the ice in consensual sexual terms as they exchange knowledge, stories, and skills during their journey. Estraven also models cultural relativism for Genly, modifying his communication to suit Genly’s more straightforward discourse. This love and empathy, LeGuin suggests, is the key to cross-cultural communication. To understand what another culture has to teach, a person must first be willing to perceive that culture through its own values.

Story as Cultural Vessel

Among the chapters of The Left Hand of Darkness, LeGuin intersperses technical reports, family legends, and mythological origin stories that span millennia of Gethen history. The novel is structured as Genly Ai’s report to the Ekumen on the success of his mission, and the integration of these various elements with Estraven’s travel diary into Genly’s first-person narration suggests the importance of multiple voices and narrative structures to representing the culture of an entire planet. Through these narrative strategies and the plot of The Left Hand of Darkness, LeGuin argues that stories contain the essence of culture.

LeGuin often places Gethen mythology or history just before a chapter that deals with similar themes. For example, the story of Berosty immediately precedes Genly’s own interactions with the Foretellers. This provides the reader with crucial expositional context, but it also indicates that Genly now understands the cultural significance of his interactions there. Similarly, the stories of the young prince and the border dispute and the sibling lovers provide context on the political dynamics and social taboos of Gethen. Genly’s previous failure to appreciate these stories prevents his success, and their inclusion in the report he builds indicates their efficacy in communicating Gethen cultural norms. On a smaller scale, Genly and Estraven deepen their understanding of one another through similar strategies. Their sharing of knowledge and stories facilitates emotional intimacy and improves their cultural sensitivity to one another. The book’s title even derives from Estraven’s recitation of a poem, describing the reconciliation of binary differences; this poem appears at the turning point of Estraven and Genly’s growing intimacy, evincing the power of literature to encapsulate theme, values, and feeling.

Genly also includes other voices in his narrative because he recognizes that a single point of view cannot accurately portray the complexity of the truth. In addition to Gethen legends, Genly includes the Ekumen researcher’s biased report on Gethen in Chapter 7. Genly, and by extension LeGuin, is careful to highlight rather than obscure the faults and failures of Ekumen diplomacy; the stories that the Genly told himself about the Gethen people are thus placed in contrast to the stories that the Gethen tell about themselves. Through this juxtaposition, LeGuin indicates that Gethen legends contain more and better information about Gethen culture than any outside observer could hope to discern. Stories become another important tool to facilitate cultural relativism in The Left Hand of Darkness, inviting readers to consider how their own biases inform their experience of narratives.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text