83 pages • 2 hours read
Henry FieldingA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide discusses references to rape that feature in the novel.
The History of Tom Jones explores the nature of virtue as both a philosophical and moral ideal, and Fielding uses different characters to model various ways in which virtue offers a guideline for improving one’s behavior and successfully pursuing a fulfilling life. Allworthy models virtue in its Latin definition of excellence, combining goodness, strength, and moral principles. Within this conceptual framework, the novel debates whether compassion serves as a strength or weakness. This underlying debate first becomes clear when some characters accuse Allworthy of foolishness for his charity toward the orphaned Tom Jones, assuming instead that his sense of obligation proves that he must be the child’s natural father. Later on, Allworthy outlines the Christian concept of charity in a lecture to Captain Blifil but then reaches the limits of his own charity whenever he learns that the recipients of his kindness have responded with ingratitude. Allworthy’s pattern of behavior therefore suggests that Fielding believes compassion and charity to have less moral value when they permit disorderly conduct or vice. Because Tom’s good-heartedness is admired by other characters and the narrator, his conduct also suggests that compassion must be tempered with good sense and other principles in order to become a virtue.
Other characters take a stricter view. Thwackum, the cleric, believes virtue requires adherence to Christian teachings at the expense of compassion. Square argues for an interpretation of virtue according to Western philosophical traditions: a combination of dignity and wisdom. The squire believes that virtue is simply obedience, which he requires of his daughter. In yet another view, the actions of Nightengale and Partridge demonstrate that virtue cannot exist alongside foolishness and self-interest. Partridge, despite his grasp of Latin classics, is a dishonest braggart who is easily fooled, while Nightengale uses his polished manners to seduce women and then boast of his conquests. Thus, Fielding suggests that the 18th-century concept of a gentleman is not necessarily one based on moral principles.
Ironically, although the narrator mocks tales of virtue that show a hero involved in one peccadillo after until suddenly reforming himself in the last act, that is exactly how Fielding structures Tom’s character arc. Languishing in jail toward the end of the novel, Tom laments his impulsive behaviors and wanton sexual behavior and resolves to behave more virtuously. Tom’s ideal of a virtuous life is modeled on Allworthy: fidelity to one’s beloved, and a preference for calm judgment that disciplines rather than harms. Combined with his innate compassion, loyalty, and honesty, these qualities lead Tom to a happy marriage with Sophia, generosity to his dependents, and admiration from his peers—the kind of benevolent, reciprocal bonds that Fielding suggests are the basis for a functioning social order.
Like virtue, The History of Tom Jones shows the ideal of female chastity to be a complicated topic at best, neither universally revered nor consistently applied. Chastity, the equivalent of virtue for a woman, is defined by her sexual status. A respectable young woman is expected to remain a virgin until marriage; remain sexually faithful to her husband during marriage; and, if widowed, refrain from having sex unless she remarries. Considering that marriages among the higher classes were also mergers of wealth and property, the emphasis on female chastity is historically a matter of controlling a woman’s reproduction and verifying the paternity of heirs. Within this social framework, chastity adds to a young woman’s desirability, as seen in the terms Tom uses to describe Sophia, for he begins by noting her sexual purity, stating, “No Breath ever yet durst sully her Reputation. The sweetest Air is not purer, the Limpid Stream not clearer than her Honour” (629). Conversely, a young woman who has lost her virginity has thereby lost her “honor” and is no longer a desirable marriage partner, as demonstrated by the pregnant Nancy Miller. This is also why Sophia would be left no choice but to marry Lord Fellamar if he succeeded in raping her.
A young woman risks her chastity if she even expresses sexual desire. Mrs. Wilkins, the housekeeper, and Honour, the lady’s maid, both agree that girls who attempt to attract men are “hussies” and “whores” who deserve censure. A girl must act coy, hide her preference, and so value her virginity that she surrenders it only upon compulsion, either through rape or after her marriage is arranged. Because even sexual desire is considered to be unchaste, Sophia takes great care to hide her feelings from Tom, is mortified when Aunt Western discovers them, and is further mortified when she believes that Tom has been bragging about her desire for him at every inn he visits.
For a “respectable” woman in this society, maintaining one’s reputation for purity is just as important as actually refraining from sexual activity. Thus, Fielding introduces several examples of women pretending chastity to preserve their reputations. For example, Bridget Allworthy has Jenny Jones hide Tom in Allworthy’s bed, as she can only raise her son if her brother adopts the boy. (Blifil’s birth eight months after the wedding might have raised eyebrows, but since his parents were married, he is legitimate, which means that his social status, unlike Tom’s, is secure.)
Jenny Jones, who finds her prospects for employment severely limited after falsely admitting to be Tom’s mother, later pretends to virtue by posing as the wife of Captain Waters: a position that garners her more respect than being a mistress. Likewise, Mrs. Fitzpatrick keeps her Irish lover a secret so that she will not lose respect in the eyes of others, and even Lady Bellaston makes an effort to hide her lovers by meeting them in rented rooms. Given that Lady Bellaston’s patronage of young men like Tom is an open secret, and that Allworthy expresses no reproof of his sister for bearing a child out of wedlock or for lying about it, it can be concluded that chastity is less of a moral imperative for older women, who are presumably less sexually desirable by these skewed standards.
This emphasis on female chastity pertains mostly to women of the aspiring middle class, to the gentry, and to business owners like Mrs. Miller, for whom the moral reputation of her business is vital to maintaining her social status and source of income. By contrast, women such as Molly Seagrim and Susan, the maid at the inn at Upton, are free to choose what lovers they please. It is Sophia, the young woman of property, whose sexual preferences are of such great concern, confirming that chastity is the virtue that secures a woman’s social position in a world where her well-being will likely depend on how the men in her life feel about her.
The many scenes of judgment in The History of Tom Jones demonstrate an ongoing preoccupation with the dispensation of justice. Given Fielding’s study of the law and his work as a magistrate, it is not unlikely that this interest would surface in his writing. But just as he is concerned about virtue as the foundation for individual character, Fielding is also concerned about the role of the individual in maintaining social order, in which the protection of persons, property, and the general peace are the primary aims. This dynamic is satirically demonstrated when the lady’s maid to Aunt Western attempts to bring a suit against Mrs. Honour, Sophia’s lady’s maid, for speaking pertly to her. Squire Western, in his capacity as justice, cannot find that Mrs. Honour committed an injury or disturbed the peace, and so the case is dismissed. This episode humorously illustrates the ability of the patriarch, the man of the house, to act as the sole and independent authority, but it also highlights an issue that Fielding would have wrestled with when he established the Bow Street Runners: determining what offenses are punishable by law and thus require a charge in the courts.
Allworthy behaves both formally and informally as magistrate and justice on several occasions, walking a fine line between that which is a matter for the courts and that which falls within the private domain. When he examines Jenny Jones and later Mr. and Mrs. Partridge, he is investigating Tom’s parentage as magistrate, since bearing illegitimate children is regarded as a disturbance of the peace. Notably, Allworthy sends for Jenny Jones to hear her testimony, but because she is missing and he has been lied to by Mrs. Partridge, he draws conclusions based on the wrong evidence, showing just one of many ways in which justice can miscarry.
Despite his position of authority, Allworthy does not interrogate Tom in the manner of a justice when Blifil makes accusations about his behavior. Instead, Allworthy acts as a grieved parent, giving Tom money, expressing his disappointment, and sending him away. There is likewise no judgment for Blifil when his schemes are uncovered, perhaps because Tom does not wish to press the issue. Instead, Tom asks that the justice shown Blifil equal that which was shown him: to be sent away without Allworthy’s protection or blessing. Allworthy’s example suggests that most disagreements can be arbitrated by a wise authority—male, of course—and a third party need only be introduced when the offense exceeds the bounds of interpersonal relationships.
Fielding also explores what education and training is required for the dispensation of judgment. On the whole, he suggests that it requires no more than a moral character and a propensity toward fairness. Within the novel, formal education is a conceit that is often mocked, not only in the case of Partridge’s school and inept attempts at Latin, but also in Aunt Western’s confused quotations. Justice, Fielding seems to suggest, rests not upon the study of the finer points of law but upon using compassion and sense to dispense judgments for the common good.
By Henry Fielding
British Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection