logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Giorgio Bassani

The Garden of the Finzi-Continis

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1962

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2, Chapter 1 Summary

The narrator’s memories jump ahead to 1938 when he finally makes it onto the estate. He, Alberto, and Micòl are now university students; the narrator and Micòl study literature. Two months after the passing of the so-called “Racial Laws” which restrict Italian Jews’ lives, Alberto calls the narrator to discuss the local news. After years of not speaking to each other, Alberto now informs him that Marchese Barbacinti, who has not been named in the novel up until this point, was kicked out of the Eleonora D’Este Tennis Club. Alberto invites the narrator to play tennis at his home. School starting again in the fall doesn’t add any stress or worry to Alberto or Micòl. While the narrator lingers on the offer without making any promises, he recalls a time when he watched a man he hadn’t recognized as Alberto hurry past him on a train platform.

The contrast between these two encounters is interrupted by the narrator’s father’s angry outburst at what he views as the Finzi-Contini “condescension.” Rather than restart his father’s political diatribe, the narrator interrupts and tries to distract his father with a shared article. The political changes that they discuss have not fully reached Ferrara, as all the Racial Laws that have passed have not been fully realized. Jewish community member Bruno Lattes’s role in the tennis club’s annual final tournament is questioned, but the narrator regrets isolating himself from the club. He has avoided all his friends and even missed the return of the Finzi-Contini family to the old synagogue last week. When he resolves to play tennis with Alberto, he discovers a letter informing him of his removal from the club. He then receives another direct invitation to visit the estate from Micòl.

Part 2, Chapter 2 Summary

Arriving that Saturday, a group of five people wait outside the estate’s gate. Bruno Lattes and his tennis partner Adriana Trentini, whose father is the chief engineer of the province, wait with Giampiero Malnate, Carlotta Sani, and Tonino Collevatti. Although the narrator struggles to recognize everyone, he shares “the inevitable glance of Jewish complicity” with Bruno (51). However, Adriana is the one who impulsively tells the narrator about the tennis tournament finals where the despised Gino Cariani and the spineless Marchese Barbacinti dismissed the match to prevent Bruno from winning with Adriana. She centers her outrage on the unfairness of stopping the game once it looked like the pair might win. When the group is interrupted by Perotti allowing them in, they discover the dog, Jor, waiting inside the walls. The estate is so vast that Perotti instructs them to bike further into the estate to discover the courts.

Part 2, Chapter 3 Summary

The weather is lovely, so this time in the garden is like an extension of summertime. The tennis-playing group expands, and the narrator is at every gathering. Alberto and Micòl welcome every guest no matter when they show up, but when it comes to the status of the courts, they are mocking and self-deprecating. Micòl introduces her favorite drink and relays its origin story with complete seriousness. She tells stories about the family’s extensive travels over snacks brought out by Perotti on a tray. Micòl consistently grabs the non-kosher ham. She guides the conversation with sophistication and ease. As they eat and converse, Perotti’s family can be spotted from a distance working on the estate. Micòl ends her stories with, “et cetera, et cetera” (60).

Part 2, Chapter 4 Summary

When the narrator goes into the garden, he sees Signora Regina waving them further down the path to rejoin her grandchildren at the tennis court. She prevents the narrator from getting too close to her grandchildren. When Professor Ermanno and Signora Olga appear, they wear black and insist that they not disturb the guests. When Micòl introduces the guests, she describes the narrator and Bruno Lattes as the intellectuals. When Adriana and Bruno arrange a rematch to make up for the canceled tennis finals, Professor Ermanno and Signora Olga appear again. Micòl translates some of the Spanish and slang terms that the family uses, letting the narrator understand what is happening within the family. Professor Ermanno also goes out of his way to spend time with the narrator. The Professor asks politely after the narrator’s family and addresses the narrator using informal pronouns. The narrator pushes back at the Professor’s attempt at familiarity, but that’s how the Professor continues to address him. The Professor mentions unpublished letters of the famous writer Carducci that would make an excellent thesis project for someone studying literature. However, the narrator must decline, as he is already locked into his current subject. Regardless, the two look forward to graduation in June.

Part 2, Chapter 5 Summary

Micòl gives the narrator a tour of the garden with assurances from Alberto that he’ll perform his famous loud whistle when it’s time to return. It is the first of many walks of theirs, and at times they ride their bikes. The narrator is immediately comfortable with her, resting one of his hands on her handlebars. She educates him about the ground, the views, and especially the trees. Her passion steers into whimsy as she teaches him to see the trees as bearded old men. He notes that “her admiration bordered on reverence” (71). Micòl’s imagination turns the largest tree in the garden into a celebrity whose mysterious planter changes as she tells the story. She addresses the fruit trees like the other working members of the household.

Their trips change into pilgrimages with Jor. Throughout their conversations, they have lots of disagreements. When Micòl protests that she and Alberto are jealous of the narrator, he heckles back. Micòl insists that although she studies at home now, they always wanted to attend the school. It is her mother’s fear of germs that keeps Micòl at home. She admits that she invited him into the garden solely because she had a crush on him, which shocks the narrator. Furthermore, she reveals that the family’s return to the larger synagogue comes from a feeling of camaraderie with the rest of the Ferrarese Jews.

It starts to rain, so finding themselves back at the barn, they discover the old, luxurious carriage. She invites him inside, and it is just as the narrator could have imagined, although he has never been inside before. They disagree over whether it has been ruined with age. Even when they are physically close together, they argue. Micòl prefers the canoe to this carriage that Perotti works so hard to preserve. She cautions the narrator that even objects die.

Part 2 Analysis

While the days spent with this group of friends playing tennis will be remembered by the narrator as a golden time, Bassani uses this section to portray the development of antisemitism in Italy in this period. Once the Italian anti-Jewish laws pass, many of these characters are limited in the places they can go. The scope of Ferrara’s antisemitism begins with how they treat Bruno Lattes. The narrator is wrong in guessing that Bruno’s admission into the tennis finals is proof of Ferrara’s tolerance, and it is Bruno’s success at the tournament that pushes people against him. Although Adriana joins the group in protest of how they treat Bruno, her reasons show a limit to her empathy. Her main concern is not that Bruno is targeted for being Jewish but that the officials broke The Appearance of Propriety by not upholding their decision to let him play. Rather than criticizing the oppression, she has a larger problem with rudeness. These details highlight the way oppressive policies creep in slowly and meet with increasing tolerance. The realities are juxtaposed with the idyllic scenes of playing tennis in warm weather, highlighting the characters’ disconnect with the impending reality at this point.

It is clear that the narrator has a closer relationship with the Finzi-Contini family than the other guests. Language is an important way that the text signifies intimacy. Both Micòl and her father bring the narrator into the fold in different ways. Micòl explains the Spanish slang that her extended family uses. Although the narrator understands some of the words already, he recognizes that Micòl and Alberto have their own dialect to reflect how close these two siblings are. While Micòl is allowing the narrator into her family’s conversation, it is the Professor who tries to make the narrator feel like he belongs. When speaking to the narrator, the Professor uses informal pronouns to show a more casual and familiar attitude. Both gestures show the importance of language throughout the text, especially given the narrator’s appreciation for literature.

These early chapters show a clear separation between the Finzi-Contini family and the guests who are allowed onto the estate but not into the house. The narrator will achieve a more important position when he is allowed to come inside, but during Part 2, the garden is the main setting. This suggests the status of the family yet draws attention to the fact that Micòl and Alberto feel caged, both by their parents and by the wider antisemitic political climate.

There is a clear distinction between Micòl’s love for her home and her apathy for the objects. This contrasts with the narrator’s obsession with cataloging the signs of wealth on the Finzi-Contini estate. Their main disagreement over the carriage shows how sentimental the narrator is. His fond childhood memories of Micòl are grounded in his memory of the luxurious carriage, and Bassani draws a parallel between the narrator’s obsession with the family and Perotti’s obsession with preserving the carriage.

Although Giampiero Malnate is also introduced in these chapters—he is one of the tennis players—the narrator rarely focuses his attention on him; he focuses only on Micòl. The older narrator recognizes that this time isn’t sustainable, but like the question of graduation, the characters are content to ignore this fact. During this time when the narrator can be with Micòl, he ignores any other issues that could be happening within his own family, the rising political tension, Malnate’s relationship with Micòl, or his father’s anxiety.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text