logo

53 pages 1 hour read

Nadine Burke Harris

The Deepest Well: Healing the Long-Term Effects of Childhood Adversity

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2018

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

Naomi Burke Harris

Nadine Burke Harris, born in 1975, is an Ivy-League trained pediatrician. She’s credited with increasing awareness about how adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) significantly affect health outcomes for people throughout life. The Deepest Well is the story of her evolving understanding of how the toxic stress responses resulting from ACEs show up on a population level as health disparities and in individuals as health problems that come out of nowhere despite no apparent risk factors. Burke Harris’s self-representation highlights the contradictions of her multiple identities and how she uses the tension among those parts of herself to do great things for communities.

Burke Harris’s primary persona in the text is that of the scientist—not the stereotypical scientist whose pursuit of knowledge is walled off from ordinary concerns and ordinary people, however. Burke Harris presents her practice of medicine and science as being motivated by curiosity and a commitment to serving people who don’t have many resources. She especially leans into being a scientist who can interpret complicated science for ordinary people. She does that by using people-driven anecdotes and clever chapter titles that connect science to pop culture (e.g., “The Sexiest Man Alive,” “Maximum-Strength Bufferin’”). Her carefully deployed jokes and colloquial speech are all designed to put the audience at ease and be receptive to the idea that seemingly abstruse science can have a direct effect on their life.

In addition, Burke Harris draws herself as a person who has vulnerabilities, makes mistakes, feels emotion, and struggles just like most professional women to balance personal and professional commitments. Her identity as the child of immigrants and a mother who had paranoid schizophrenia are among the aspects of her life that she shares. These disclosures about who she is and her motivations shore up her credibility as a person who not only knows the science but is subject to the same biological force of the stress response. Her emphasis on this commonality underscores her explicit argument that ACEs and the stress response are universals that should unite us.

Her persona evolves to some extent over the course of the book. She initially presents herself as a naive young doctor whose theory about the ACE-health link places her at odds with the medical establishment. She experiences setbacks and disappointments in her fight to raise awareness about the ACE-health connection, but she grows by learning to trust her collaborators and focusing on practical matters—protocols, data, and solutions. In the book’s final chapters, Burke Harris is moving in rare company (she name-drops Kamala Harris, whom she knows as a former district attorney and senator) and even envisions herself in the future as having met her goal.

Bayview-Hunters Point

Bayview-Hunters Point (also referred to as “Bayview” in the book) is a predominantly Black community in San Francisco, California. Bayview became a majority Black neighborhood during the 1940s when the US naval shipyard Hunter’s Point was active and provided jobs for many Black shipyard workers. During the years that The Deepest Well covers, the community suffers from lack of access to healthy food, poor health care, and issues with street violence. In The Deepest Well, Burke Harris represents Bayview as a typical working-class community of Black people. The residents of Bayview, including Burke Harris’s patients, struggle because of the lack of resources in their community, but they also exhibit resilience and a willingness to help each other.

Burke Harris’s complex relationship with the community colors her representation of it. She takes great care to treat the residents and her patients with respect, especially by listening to them to figure out what the community needs to thrive; still, she acknowledges the tension arising from her status as outsider, especially in the initial years of her work at the pediatric clinic. These tensions are particularly present in Part 3, Chapter 8: “Stop the Massacre,” when community activists slow down the approval process for additions to the clinic and center. Burke Harris speculates that this opposition is rooted in self-interest among community activists and anti-immigrant bias based on her Jamaican American roots. Retrograde forces like these don’t predominate in Burke Harris’s account of Bayview. The community shows up in force to support the clinic, leading Burke to see herself as part of that community and to her insight that resilience and helping each other are the most essential traits of Bayview.

Caroline

Caroline appears in Part 3, Chapter 10: “Maximum-Strength Bufferin’”—in which Burke Harris describes Caroline as an attractive, white, affluent woman who made her money as a technology entrepreneur. Despite these accomplishments, Caroline and her child (Karl) are survivors of severe verbal and emotional abuse; Caroline, in contrast to the clients Burke Harris was seeing at Bayview at the time, had access to many resources but still had no idea about the effect of ACEs on her and her son—or about the importance of removing her son from the damage that her husband’s behavior did to their family.

Caroline is an important figure in the book because her story allows Burke Harris to make the point that everyone is subject to the negative effect of ACEs and trauma in their lives; Caroline’s healing and that of her son happens through therapy, self-care, and education about how ACEs continue to shape Karl’s life, underscoring for Burke Harris that the universality of ACEs and treatment for toxic stress responses offers a chance for people to unite around this one issue.

Charlene and Nia

Charlene is the young parent of Nia, a toddler who suffers from a failure to thrive under her mother’s care. Burke Harris circles around Charlene’s story multiple times. Initially, Charlene exemplifies a parent who’s incapable of providing care to her daughter. Burke Harris involves Child Protective Services (CPS) when it becomes clear that Charlene’s emotional disconnect from her daughter plays a role in her daughter’s poor health.

Charlene engages with the clinic staff; the intervention that eventually allows her to be a present parent in her daughter’s life is what Burke Harris recommends for families dealing with ACEs. It includes a multidisciplinary team to deal with the complexities of ACEs, parent-child therapy that strengthens relationships and helps parents become better buffers for their children, and addressing multigenerational ACEs. Charlene and Nia’s story are a sort of “happy ending” that shows the real effect of applying insights about how best to treat patients struggling with adversity.

Diego

Diego is one of Burke Harris’s patients, and his story is an additional framing anecdote that bookends her narrative, appearing close to the start and the end of the book. At the start of the book, Burke Harris describes Diego as an adorable seven-year-old who has the bones and body of a four-year-old. The fact that his development ceased in the same year that a lodger sexually abused him in his parents’ house is a data point that inspires Burke Harris’s research on the connection between ACEs and health problems later in life.

Burke Harris returns to Diego’s story 10 years later and finds that he’s had several successes but still encounters setbacks. The continuing need to support Diego in managing his stress response is evidence that the solution to helping survivors like him is clear yet complicated to implement. In addition, Diego is a figure who typifies many of Burke Harris’s patients in Bayview: He’s vulnerable to violence in his home and his community, but through his own resilience and the help of a buffering parent/caretaker, he can move forward with his life.

Evan and Louis, the Burke Brothers

Evan is a sibling of Burke Harris. He appears four times in The Deepest Well: as the subject of an anecdote about a seemingly healthy 43-year-old man who has a stroke despite having no risk factors except a hidden one (adversity in childhood); as a sibling who takes care of Burke Harris when she suffers a breakdown in the aftermath of a pregnancy loss; as a brother who responds to their ACE (having a parent with untreated paranoid schizophrenia) by becoming a charmer; and once again as a patient whose life is saved after a stroke.

Burke Harris’s decision to dramatically detail her brother’s story in the book’s introduction helps anchor the urgency of addressing the ACE-health connection. Her disclosure later in the book that he’s her brother helps show that even a doctor like Burke Harris can benefit from understanding that connection. Evan’s charm and brotherly support exemplify the other side of ACEs—the superpowers of resilience and empathy that those who survive adversity often have.

The short narrative about Louis, a third Burke sibling, is a cautionary tale about the other possible outcome even in seemingly stable and financially comfortable families like the Burkes. Louis is missing and has been since he was 17. His story also explains why Burke Harris has a personal stake in making sure people know about the importance of the ACE lens.

Victor Felitti

Felitti is the first author of “Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults,” published in 1998 in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. The work of Felitti and his co-authors serves as the first indication for Burke that a toxic stress response might be the biological mechanism that explains how ACEs lead to poor health outcomes later in life. In Burke Harris’s book, Felitti is a scientist and doctor whose work exemplifies how inquiry-driven research, happy accidents, and a willingness to listen to the stories of patients can lead to breakthroughs.

Burke Harris also points out that Felitti and his co-authors didn’t gain much traction in their work; Burke Harris didn’t even know about the work during her medical school education just a few years later. Her account of the rejection of Felitti and his co-authors’ research is an important example of the power of lenses or paradigms to shape the tools that doctors can bring to bear in their treatment of patients. The study and Felitti are central elements of The Deepest Well because one of Burke Harris’s main motivations for authoring the book was to make the ACE-health connection that Felitti explored more widely known.

John Snow

English physician John Snow (1813-1858) played a central role in determining the cause of a deadly cholera outbreak in a London neighborhood in the mid-1850s. Snow rejected the prevailing theory that diseases like cholera came from bad air (the miasma theory). He instead believed that some undefined biological mechanism was allowing the disease to spread. In one of the earliest instances of Western epidemiological research, Snow used information about occurrences of the disease to figure out that the source of contamination was a neighborhood well; acting on these findings, he had authorities remove the handle on the well; the downslope in cases convinced many that his insights led to that decline.

Snow use of data and his rejection of common scientific wisdom of the day to stop an outbreak in its tracks is the frame that Burke Harris uses to illustrate the field of public health and the inspiration for her inquiry into the causes of health disparities in Bayview. In Burke Harris’s account, Snow is the archetypal public health scientist—part hero and part detective—whose dogged search for underlying biological mechanisms changed the course of medical history. In fact, she tips her hat to his work in her book’s title.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text