56 pages • 1 hour read
Frederick ForsythA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Day of the Jackal portrays an intense political resentment which causes character to crave revenge against those they presume to have wronged them. This fierce resentment motivates many of the characters to take drastic action, particularly violent action. The most explicit example of this is the OAS, an organization formed in a haze of political resentment following the independence of Algeria. The OAS membership is composed chiefly of former soldiers who feel betrayed by Charles de Gaulle and civilians who loathe him for the detrimental effect de Gaulle had on soldiers in their lives. For these individuals, resentment turns political discontent into a mission for violent vengeance. These characters, such as Bastien-Thiry and Rodin, become so consumed by their need for revenge against de Gaulle that they are willing to kill. Their resentment is so intense that they cannot see a possible future for France while the figurehead of their hatred remains alive. Rather than fighting purely for their country, their actions reveal a personal vendetta against de Gaulle. The need for revenge consumes them, to the extent that they are willing to fundamentally change the landscape of French politics to deal with their resentment. They may claim to be fighting for France, but personal revenge against de Gaulle is their primary motivation.
To the former soldiers of the OAS, the sacrifices they made in Indo-China and Algeria have been wasted by de Gaulle’s politicking. They crave revenge, not just for themselves, but for their fallen comrades. The horrors they witnessed abroad while maintaining the French colonial empire still fester within them; they are furious and broken, but this resentment can only manifest according to the same violent principles. The violence essential to maintaining a colonial empire now finds its way home, redirecting their bitterness toward their own nation’s leader. The violence necessary to the maintenance of a colonial empire returns home, so the soldiers who want revenge can only express their bitterness through the language of violence.
The political resentment is evident in civilians, as well. Jacqeline’s brother and lover were both soldiers in the French Army. Like the members of the OAS, she blames de Gaulle for their deaths, as well as the death of her unborn child. Jacqueline craves revenge against the French political project and de Gaulle in particular, but she lacks the resources and training of the former soldiers. She weaponizes her femininity, seducing Saint-Clair de Villauban as an act of political resentment. She loathes every moment she spends with the aristocratic politician, but her desire for revenge allows her to put her feelings to the side. Like the soldiers, she makes a sacrifice in the name of revenge against the French political system which betrayed her. Her methods differ, but her desire for revenge against the French political system remains equally intense.
The Jackal is almost defined by his resistance to such intense emotions. His dispassionate assessment of the OAS assignment suggests that he has no real political views, much less resentment. For the Jackal, revenge is much less important than money. For a moment, however, there is a brief glimpse of his own resentment of the wealthy and an envy of their lifestyles as he decides whether to continue with the mission. This brief glimpse into the Jackal’s private motivations explain why he is such an effective vessel for the intense emotions of others: Beneath his professional detachment lies a deep-seated envy, which he channels into living well at others’ expense.
In contrast to the emotional men, the novel presents a select number of meticulous alternatives who herald the changing of an era. The novel revels in this portrayal of professional competence by listing the exact details of everything from identity theft to rifle assembly. The specificity of the prose heralds the specificity of the main characters. The Jackal is dispassionate, pragmatic, and methodical. He squashes any intense emotions so that he can be more effective. This approach is shown to be much more effective than the OAS previous attempts, all of which were fueled by intense hatred of de Gaulle. By turning to the Jackal, the OAS acknowledges the failure of their emotionally driven operations and elevates the methodical over the fervent. The French security services, motivated by a similar kind of intense (though pro-Gaullist) emotion, find themselves stumped by the Jackal. His methodical approach scuppers their investigation, given that they are so used to investigating and apprehending the emotional OAS men. However, when faced with this new kind of opponent, they too adopt a meticulous strategy, personified by Claude Lebel. In this way, Claude Lebel is presented as the counterpart to the meticulous approach to the Jackal.
The sudden promotion of Claude Lebel gestures toward the changing social hierarchies in France during this time. Notably, his chief opponent during the daily meetings of the security services is Colonel Saint-Clair de Villauban. The two men could not be more different. The unremarkable, quiet, slightly scruffy figure of Lebel contrasts with the pompous prominence of the aristocratic Saint-Clair de Villauban. In this way, they represent different eras. Lebel is a signal of the coming age, whereas Saint-Clair de Villauban is a relic of France’s past. He is the aristocrat whose name has promoted him far beyond his capabilities. Not only is he often wrong (in contrast to Lebel, who is proved correct), but he is an active detriment to the mission. Lebel’s methodical approach is nothing if it is not humble. This modesty allows Lebel to know his limits. Colonel Saint-Clair de Villauban has none of this modesty. His foolishness imbues him with the belief that he knows better than everyone, so much so that security concerns do not apply to him. He talks openly about the investigation to his mistress, a secret agent who has been planted by the OAS specifically because Saint-Clair de Villauban is an arrogant fool. Lebel’s success and Saint-Clair de Villauban’s shame are suggestive of the changing class dynamics in France, in which a man’s name no longer makes him worthy of promotion.
The Jackal and Lebel are not unique. Though they are the most prominent examples of meticulous men in the novel, others appear, often in aid of Lebel. Bryn Thomas in Britain, for example, is subjected to a similarly class-orientated discrimination in the British security services but he fundamentally understands and approves of Lebel’s meticulous approach. He delivers important results. Even the police officer in the small town, Caillou, is referred to as “a methodical man” (332). Meanwhile, Caron is essentially serving as Lebel’s apprentice and learning how to approach police work in the methodical, practical manner. The references to these men, scattered across various police departments, suggests that they are a coming force. They are not rewarded for their success with much more than thanks, but their true reward will be the rise of the meticulous men as the dominant mode of thought of the new era. The old guard will be eased aside as the meticulous men establish themselves. Their quiet competence signals a new era of rationality, precision, and careful action.
After accepting the assignment to kill Charles de Gaulle, the Jackal reads everything he can about the French leader. De Gaulle is a gigantic figure in French society, imbuing himself and his name with the successful spirit of the French resistance which drove out Nazi Germany during World War II. This victory is fundamental to the French national identity during the 1960s and the Jackal recognizes the way in which de Gaulle has presented himself as the avatar of this notion of French victory. This, he correctly determines, is de Gaulle’s hubris. In this context, hubris refers to excessive pride, arrogance, or self-confidence, often leading a character to disregard warnings or advice from others. De Gaulle, as the Jackal predicts, does exactly this. He ignores advice from his security services to withdraw from the public eye until his assassin is dealt with. In particular, the Jackal surmises that de Gaulle’s hubris will prompt him to appear in public on Liberation Day of all days and in the square which is so closely associated with his (and France’s) victory. The Jackal forms his entire plan on the basis of de Gaulle’s hubris. He will execute de Gaulle on the spot built to commemorate his greatest moment, at a time when de Gaulle has ignored all calls to shield himself.
To stop the Jackal, the French authorities turn to Claude Lebel. The quiet, modest Lebel is almost the antithesis of de Gaulle. While de Gaulle’s is a public figure who projects a confident and imperious character, Lebel is a reserved, private figure who is more concerned with observation than action. Lebel is brought in almost as a balance to de Gaulle’s hubris. Lebel’s success lays in putting aside his hubris and recognizing his own limitations, which is exactly what he does in his opening speech to the meeting of the security forces. His is an unenviable assignment and his hard work, rather than his presumed brilliance, will be needed to crack the case. Lebel reiterates his lack of hubris when he credits his good fortune and when he thanks others. These concessions represent a willing surrender of agency and glory, the kind of modesty which men like de Gaulle or Saint-Clair de Villauban could never muster. Even in the final chapters, Lebel is faced with the prospect of catching the Jackal and he confesses that his plan amounts to little more than looking around. He succeeds, but his modesty suggests that the ability to recognize and overcome one’s hubris is the key to success.
For most of the novel, the Jackal has been methodical and practical. He has turned de Gaulle’s hubris against him, correctly assessing the psychology of his target. As Lebel draws closer, however, the Jackal becomes more desperate. His careful planning gives him confidence, but he rapidly becomes delusional about his chances of success. With his prospects dwindling, his determination to kill de Gaulle becomes almost hubristic. When he has de Gaulle in his sights, he is nearly validated. When de Gaulle’s simple gesture of bending to kiss a veteran disrupts the Jackal’s plan, however, it highlights the limits of even the most methodical planning when arrogance creeps in. Ironically, de Gaulle barely even notices the missed shot. The ceremony continues as normal. De Gaulle demonstrated extreme hubris by refusing to change his behavior, but he—rather than the Jackal—is validated. The hubristic de Gaulle lives to see another day, thanks to the efforts of the modest Lebel. While Lebel will never receive the praise he is due, this becomes another part of the Gaullist legend, exacerbating de Gaulle’s hubristic tendencies. Ironically, the Jackal rather than de Gaulle is punished for hubris.
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Revenge
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
War
View Collection