62 pages • 2 hours read
Kati MartonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapter 12 examines Angela Merkel’s response to Russia’s war in Ukraine in 2014, a situation that forced her to take on a leading role as she was the only leader who could sit down and negotiate with Vladimir Putin. Merkel found the task difficult but demonstrated resilience throughout the process.
The chapter begins by discussing the geopolitical significance of Ukraine, a country with a tumultuous history marked by subjugation under both Hitler and Stalin. After the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine struggled with corruption and ineffective governance until 2014, when Russia began asserting its influence, causing a significant international crisis.
The crisis escalated in February 2014 when Ukraine was on the verge of signing a pivotal agreement with the EU, which was seen as a step toward political and economic integration with the West. Putin, intent on preventing this alignment, pressured Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych to reject the EU deal in favor of joining Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union. This sparked massive protests in Ukraine, leading to Yanukovych’s removal from the presidency and his subsequent flight to Russia.
Afterward, Putin initiated a military intervention in the country’s Eastern region, Donbas, exploiting the weakness of the unprepared Ukrainian military and sowing chaos. Russia deployed troops and used a strategy of deception, denial, and disinformation, known as maskirovka (deception). Soon, Russia illegally annexed Crimea, a peninsula forming part of the Ukrainian territory.
Merkel leveraged her diplomatic skills, aiming to de-escalate the situation through persistent dialogue. However, she faced the challenge of Putin’s unashamed dishonesty and aggressive tactics. Her approach involved a mix of firm negotiation, sanctions against Russia, and efforts to maintain European unity.
Merkel’s strategy was complicated by divisions within the Western alliance and the differing perspectives of other leaders, particularly President Barack Obama, who refused to converse with Putin due to their blatant differences, and who relied on her to lead diplomatic efforts. Despite her determination, Merkel was challenged in her pursuit of peace. She remained committed to Germany’s pacifist stance while dealing with an international crisis of proportions. In spite of the Minsk agreements that Merkel played a central role in, Crimea remained occupied, and Ukraine has remained a battleground ever since.
Chapter 13 discusses Angela Merkel’s historic decision to open Germany’s borders to refugees in 2015. Merkel’s decision came during a growing refugee crisis, with hundreds of thousands fleeing war-torn regions like Syria. This decision, bold for the usually cautious leader, positioned Germany as a moral beacon in a world increasingly leaning toward xenophobia. Merkel proved that her commitment to protecting human rights had never waned.
The chapter also counts a pivotal moment at a town hall meeting in Rostock, when a young Lebanese-Palestinian girl, Reem Sahwil, expressed her fear of being uprooted again, as she had just begun her life in Germany. Merkel offered an initially bureaucratic response, but when the girl started crying Merkel’s response became more empathetic.
As the refugee influx into Germany surged in 2015, with around 500,000 people entering the country, Merkel had to decide to counter the indifference or hostility from other European leaders, such as Britain’s David Cameron and Hungary’s Viktor Orban, who adopted hardline stances against refugees. The images of refugees being mistreated in Hungary, particularly at Budapest’s Keleti train station, deeply affected Merkel, reminding her of the historical atrocities that had taken place in Europe only about half a century prior.
In August 2015, Merkel announced that Germany would not turn away refugees, challenging the EU’s Dublin Regulation and calling on other EU members to share the burden. Marton asserts that her declaration was driven by moral clarity and a historical consciousness, reminiscent of the failure of nations to act during the 1938 Êvian Conference, which turned away the Jewish refugees during the Holocaust, abandoning them to Hitler’s army.
Despite facing criticism from various quarters, including from her own party and conservative figures like Henry Kissinger and Helmut Kohl, Merkel’s decision remained unwavering. She believed that Germany had a moral obligation to act and saw the refugee crisis as an opportunity to reaffirm the country’s humanitarian values.
The German public’s response was initially supportive, with volunteers across the country stepping up to assist the refugees. However, Merkel’s policy soon sparked a backlash, particularly from the far-right AfD, which had started as a movement opposing Germany’s support of keeping Greece within the EU economic zone during the financial crisis. In 2015 the AfD started capitalizing on anti-immigrant sentiments to gain political ground.
Merkel’s approach was also informed by her strategic vision of integrating refugees to benefit Germany’s aging workforce. However, she struggled to effectively communicate this rationale to the public, often relying on moral arguments rather than practical justifications.
Chapter 14 outlines the tumultuous year 2016 for Angela Merkel, marked by multiple crises that tested her leadership. Merkel faced a deteriorating EU, a series of terrorist attacks in Germany, and the election of Donald Trump as US President, which threatened her policies and the diplomatic relationships between the two countries built during the decades prior.
Merkel had always been wary of overstaying her political tenure, mindful of Helmut Kohl’s fall from grace after a long term. Kohl’s party was accused of having received illegal donations, leading to Kohl’s resignation and subsequent retirement. As her third term was ending, Merkel planned to step down, but 2016’s events made this impossible.
For one, the Brexit vote on June 23rd, 2016, deeply disappointed her, as it represented a significant setback for the EU and emboldened Russian interests. Furthermore, Germany was hit by several terrorist attacks in 2016, exacerbating public fear and inviting more criticism of Merkel’s refugee policy. Notable incidents included the Würzburg train attack, in which five people were wounded, and the Munich shooting, which left nine people dead. Following these attacks, Merkel addressed the nation, promising more focus on security, while at the same time insisting on the importance of humanitarian values.
In Turkey, a failed coup against President Erdogan led to a crackdown, including the arrest of tens of thousands of Turkish citizens who were seen as a threat to the regime. An almost-complete elimination of independent media followed. This complicated Merkel’s efforts to manage the refugee crisis and maintain stability. Domestically, Merkel faced declining support and rising opposition from the right-wing AfD, but she refused to abandon her refugee policies.
The election of Donald Trump in November 2016 signaled a shift toward isolationism and authoritarianism in the US, which further unsettled Merkel. Encouraged by outgoing President Obama, Merkel decided to run for a fourth term, seeing it as her duty to counter rising global populism and authoritarianism.
The year ended with a tragic terrorist attack at a Berlin Christmas market, which left 12 people dead and 56 injured, putting even more pressure on Merkel and her policies. Despite these challenges, Merkel remained committed to her principles, preparing to continue leading Germany.
Chapter 15 details Merkel’s interactions with Donald Trump and her strategy going forward. Merkel prepared extensively for her first meeting with Trump by studying his past interviews, books, and TV shows to understand his personality and tendencies in communication. She found his rallies, especially the “Lock her up!” chant directed at Hillary Clinton, particularly disturbing. Despite her efforts to comprehend and adapt to Trump's behavior, she remained skeptical of his ability to change once in office. In contrast, President Trump prepared for his first meeting with Merkel only briefly, receiving the briefing notes while in the washroom the morning of the meeting.
In their first meeting in March 2017, Merkel attempted to navigate Trump’s volatile nature with careful diplomacy. She avoided lecturing him and maintained her composure despite his erratic behavior and offensive remarks. The meeting accentuated the challenges Merkel faced in dealing with Trump, whose approach to leadership was starkly different from her own.
Throughout Trump’s presidency, Merkel struggled to confront Trump’s disregard for NATO and the EU. Trump continuously claimed that the US contributed to NATO much more than other members and that the others, especially Germany, owed money to the US. Moreover, Trump’s erratic tweets and public statements further frustrated Merkel’s efforts to maintain communication.
Merkel’s irritation with Trump’s behavior became evident in 2018, during the G7 summit in Canada, where a tense exchange between the leaders displayed the growing rift. Therefore, by mid-2018, Merkel had largely accepted the limitations of her influence over Trump and focused instead on strengthening the EU. She left negotiations and communication between Germany and the US in the hands of ambassadors and advisors.
Merkel also faced personal challenges, which added to her stressful mandate. In 2019, her mother, Herlind Kasner, whom Merkel was very close to, died at 90 years old. While she kept a stern appearance in public in Germany, she nevertheless appeared more affected by the loss outside her home country, for example during a visit to Cambridge. The stress of those years resulted in a deterioration of Merkel’s health, with several episodes of trembling in public, such as during the visit of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky.
Chapters 12 through 15 highlight key matters that shaped Merkel’s legacy, such as Merkel’s approach to international crises and her moral and humanitarian stance on refugees. Throughout, Marton emphasizes The Nature of Merkel’s Nonconfrontational Style in navigating new challenges.
Merkel’s leadership during international crises is a significant aspect of these chapters. Her handling of the Ukraine conflict in 2014, as outlined in Chapter 12, exemplifies her diplomatic skills and resilience. Merkel faced the formidable challenge of negotiating with Vladimir Putin, a leader known for his aggressive tactics and untruthful demeanor. Merkel’s background in science supplemented her resilience at the negotiation table with Putin. She relied on persistence and facts:
Merkel asserted her forensic familiarity with every detail of Russia’s invasion: the militia’s daily movements, the outposts it had seized, and the casualties for which it would be held accountable. ‘I think I know every tree in Donbas,’ she once claimed. These facts, rather than actual arms, were her weapons. With facts, she could try to hold Putin to account (175).
Despite the difficulties, Merkel’s persistent dialogue, firm negotiations, and implementation of sanctions against Russia showed her commitment to de-escalating the situation. Merkel’s ability to maintain European unity in the face of internal divisions and external threats highlighted her role as a de facto leader of the Western world during this crisis. Merkel displayed her commitment through her work, allowing her determination to speak for itself. In the quote, the two politicians, Merkel and Putin, are contrasted through their choice of “arms”: While Putin uses actual military force, Merkel opts for diplomacy and facts.
Nevertheless, although her diplomatic effort in 2014 during the negotiations of the Minsk agreements was appreciated, she has been widely criticized for her soft approach in later years, especially after the end of her career and the approach of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022. In subsequent interviews, Merkel recognized that she failed to influence Vladimir Putin into a peaceful resolution and that her reconciliatory strategy was not enough to stop the further invasion of Ukraine. She also admitted that the West, especially Germany, was reliant on Russian gas for too long and that further action should have been taken to display the resolution and united force that could have stopped Putin.
Merkel’s interactions with Donald Trump, as detailed in Chapter 15, further illustrate her diplomatic style. Merkel prepared extensively for her meetings with Trump, studying his style in an attempt to counter him in discussion. However, this strategy did not yield strong results, as Trump was not playing the same game as Merkel. Despite the challenges posed by Trump’s erratic behavior and disregard for traditional alliances like NATO, Merkel maintained a professional demeanor and continued to focus on strengthening the EU. While this approach has worked for a long time and has built Germany into a resilient and important actor on the international scene, it has also reached a limit, as populist movements have rolled in, and peacekeeping requires more resolute action. Merkel’s interactions with Trump also show Merkel’s difficulty in adapting to situations that are out of her understanding. In this case, Trump was not an opponent that Merkel could study and analyze. Rather, he produced situations that challenged Merkel on the spot. In some cases she was able to respond, in some others she was, like many other leaders, pushed into frustration and left without an answer by the forceful Donald Trump.
Another critical theme in these chapters is Merkel’s moral and humanitarian approach to the refugee crisis. Merkel’s decision to open Germany’s borders to migrants in 2015 was a bold move for the cautious leader. This decision positioned Germany as a moral example in an increasingly prejudiced world. Merkel’s decision reaffirmed Germany’s humanitarian values and reflected Merkel’s vision of a reformed Germany, which also benefits economically from strengthening the country’s aging workforce. Despite facing significant criticism from various quarters, including conservative figures within her own party, Merkel remained steadfast in her belief that Germany had a moral (and economic) obligation to act.
Overall, Merkel’s response to crises, such as the terrorist attacks in Germany, the Brexit vote, and the election of Donald Trump, was marked by her refusal to abandon her principles and policies. Despite declining support and rising opposition, Merkel remained committed to her policy and decided to run for a fourth term, as she considered that her duties to her country and the world had not ended.
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
Women's Studies
View Collection