21 pages • 42 minutes read
Alexander PushkinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The poem juxtaposes humans and nature as two mighty opposites, contending for supremacy. Each battles the other, in a forceful back and forth. The area around the mouth of the Neva River seems a very inhospitable place for human habitation; only a few poor people eke out a living there. Then comes Peter the Great with a stupendous vision and the power to carry it out. Atop swamp and forest, Saint Petersburg rises up in such splendor the narrator calls it one of the wonders of the world. Man has subdued the river into a scenic spectacle for human enjoyment: The narrator writes warmly of the “Neva’s augustly flowing water” decorating the city majestically (Introduction, Line 45).
But though humanity has its years of triumph, nature only seems to be tame. In fact, it bides its time, and when opportunity presents itself, the river rises up. The poem personifies the water as a malevolent force with an ill-will toward the city, describing it as seeking vengeance, lying in wait to strike like thieves breaking into houses, and as behaving like a mighty beast that escapes from a cage and wants to kill everything in sight. The rising, raging water is cannot be stopped—all the splendor of Saint Petersburg is overwhelmed in a few hours. As the waves rise waist-high, terrified people scurry like small creatures disturbed by a predator. Before nature’s raw, unfettered power, human structures can do nothing but break and crumble. The advantage in this age-old contest is now firmly with nature. It refuses to be dominated by the will of human beings.
After the Neva achieves a “great victory” (Part Two, Line 21), it is proud of what it has accomplished. Human beings are humbled before it. Even the reigning tsar, Alexander I, is forced to admit that “The Tsar is no commander / Of God’s own elements” (Part One, Lines 110-11). Humans of course will recover, but nature has won this round, and many people, including Yevgeny, have suffered cruel and irreversible losses. The narrator expresses the earnest wish that the waves do not “with futile insurrection / Disturb great Peter’s ageless sleep” (Introduction, Lines 90-91)—he now knows what destruction nature can bring to hubristic humans.
The poem argues that the needs of the individual—the common man, exemplified by the lowly clerk Yevgeny—often conflict with the power of the state, which is represented by Tsar Peter the Great, the visionary leader responsible for the construction of Saint Petersburg. Peter has created a world-caliber city, but with little care about how its ordinary citizens would be affected by the decision to base Saint Petersburg at the mouth of a river prone to floods. Yevgeny is the antithesis of the tsar, a powerless and poor worker who resents the unfairness of society and contrasts his own situation with “that select / Fraternity of men” who are “set over / The common folk” and “live in clover, / Though lazy, not to say inept” (Part One, Lines 36-39). Yevgeny has very modest desires. All he really wants is to marry his sweetheart Parasha, and have children and grandchildren with her.
When the flood comes, Yevgeny climbs atop one of the marble lions not far from the statue of the Bronze Horseman. As Yevgeny despairs at not seeing Parasha’s hut, the Bronze Horseman rises far above the waters, indifferent. As translator John Dewey notes in his commentary, Pushkin takes care to provide his common man hero with some dignity when set against the mighty Peter the Great. On top of the lion, Yevgeny, just like Peter, has his elevated perch from which he can survey the entire scene. However, already we can see how little the absolute ruler Peter cares about peons like Yevgeny: In a key detail, the tsar’s statue is turned away from the man suffering near him.
The flood costs Yevgeny his beloved Parasha and his grip on reality. When he sees the statue once more, he is overwhelmed by Peter’s power: “His figure awesome to behold!” (Part Two, Line 155) since he is “Fate’s mighty master!” (Part Two, Line 161). Yevgeny understands that Peter’s modernizing efforts “reined Russia back from vaulting / Into the bottomless abyss” (Part Two, Lines 163-64). Yet Yevgeny turns in fury on the Bronze Horseman, angry that Peter’s vision has meant misery for the lower classes: “You … builder of grand schemes! I’ll come / And get you!” (Part Two, Lines 178-79).
The conflict now erupts, with Yevgeny representing the common man in rebellion against the powerful state. Russia may be stronger and more respected as a result of Peter’s actions—he responded to the collective need of the nation—but what about the many lives that have been lost in the process, to floods and before that to the building of the city itself? Readers would have known that Peter the Great was a ruthless autocratic ruler who put down revolts without mercy. Yevgeny imagines a terrifying response to his challenge: The bronze statue pursues the poor distressed man with such relentlessness that Yevgeny never again challenges him.
Though the narrator praises Peter, his sympathies lie with Yevgeny, “my poor, hapless brother” (Part Two, Line 89). Pushkin could not afford to be too explicit about endorsing rebellion against an autocratic tsar—his work was subject to the censor’s approval—but he was certainly in favor of social reform. His elevation of the common man marks this as a poem in the high Romantic tradition.
Underlying the poem’s main themes—mankind versus nature; the individual versus the state—is a lightly sketched tragic love story, which offers another way of understanding the text. The reader never meets Yevgeny’s sweetheart, but Yevgeny’s feelings for “His love, his dear Parasha” (Part One, Line 150) are very apparent. When he realizes that she has been swept away in the flood, he is so overcome by grief that he loses his mental equilibrium. Parasha was clearly his one hope for a happy and fulfilling life. In an ending that echoes Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Yevgeny and Parasha come together only in death, when he is buried near the wreckage of her hut, and she presumably lies somewhere nearby.
This doomed love story paints the flood of 1824 as inescapable and fated. Unlike the poem’s version of nature, which specifically targets the city that bound it, fate is an impersonal, inexorable force that no amount of desire, planning, or struggle can escape. Yevgeny feels that his life is predetermined, resigned to wondering, “Is all our life, devoid of sense, / A dream: Fate’s jest at Man’s expense?” (Part One, Lines 152-53). The series of reverses that Yevgeny endures exemplify its workings: “Such harsh blows, dealt one on another / By Fate” (Part Two, Lines 91-92). In his commentary on the poem, translator John Dewey argues that the poem upholds Yevgeny’s determinism: “The vast, impersonal forces of order and chaos, locked in an unending struggle—these, Pushkin seems to be saying, are the reality […] fate seems to take a perverse delight in teasing and tormenting in particular such decent, altruistic individuals as Yevgeny” (32-33).
In Yevgeny’s eyes, only great men like Tsar Peter take charge of their destiny—in anger, Yevgeny rues that Peter is “Fate’s mighty master” (Part Two, Line 161), though the poem wonders whether the Neva will really let Peter rest or whether it will ravage the city that is his self-determined legacy.
By Alexander Pushkin