60 pages • 2 hours read
Zana FraillonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section contains depictions of human suffering and violence towards and the murder of children, as well as discussions of self-harm, the death of a parent, and death by suicide. It depicts life in detention centers, the persecution of immigrants, and the persecution of Muslims, particularly the Rohingya. Refugee experiences, and associated depictions of displacement and trauma, are described. It also engages in negative stereotypes of people with missing eyes.
As far back as humans can trace, people have depended on oral traditions to transmit cultural heritage to their progeny. Storytelling has always been at the core of preserving language and traditions within a people group as well as a means of entertainment and artistic expression. In her novel The Bone Sparrow, Zana Fraillon highlights that storytelling is a vital force that connects individuals to each other and their cultural heritage. At the beginning of the novel, Subhi explains that he depends on his maá’s stories to learn about his Rohingya culture. Though separated from his home country, through her words, Subhi connects to his culture and finds his identity. Subhi explains the importance of the knowledge she carries, the “stories from a time so long gone that he couldn’t know except by being told them himself” (45). Stories connect Subhi, Queeny, and their mother in an immediate way, but they also connect the three to their people overall.
Maá shares happy stories, but she doesn’t shy away from sharing the painful parts of their history, and through her depictions of the suffering of Rohingya people, Subhi fosters a sense of pride in his community, understanding the resilience of his people to survive persecution and exile. Storytelling is also a vehicle for teaching language, and through his maá’s tales, Subhi learns to speak Rohingya, maintaining a linguistic continuity that is vital to passing cultural identities on to the next generation. However, conditions in the camp together with the trauma of institutionalization have left Maá broken in body and spirit, and she wanes in her will to be the sole carrier of their heritage. Subhi longs for her stories each night, but he soon realizes that he must become the carrier of the stories as well as create new ones of his own. The entirety of the three’s culture survives through these stories, and the three of them survive in a physical and emotional way through them too, Maá losing her ability to leave her bed when she does not engage with them regularly. The novel emphasizes the link between the Rohingya generally and Rohingya people in a physical and individualistic sense; the group needs to survive, but so do the individuals, and all will do so through cultural narratives. Specific generations will endure through them, as will the exact process of creating cultural generations.
Subhi enjoys weaving his own creative stories, and the practice becomes an outlet for him since educational and recreational activities are scarce inside the camp. Storytelling provides a fantastical escape from the harsh environment as well as allows Subhi some semblance of agency over his life as he creates the narrative. As Subhi spends time with people in the camp, particularly the older residents, he begins to collect their stories and even illustrate them. Subhi begins to understand the power of storytelling on a deeper level as he realizes that the stories help keep hope alive and that, like Maá, when people stop recounting the stories, they deteriorate physically and emotionally.
Subhi explains the danger, saying, “Because sometimes, in here, when people stop talking, and stop asking, and stop remembering, that’s when they start to lose that piece of themselves” (47). As Queeny asserts repeatedly, the refugees feel unseen and their stories untold. By listening and recording their stories in artistic form, Subhi restores part of their humanity and reminds them of what it means to be Rohingya. In the end, Subhi learns that he, too, needs healing through stories, and it is the discovery of his ba’s book of poetry that helps him begin recovering from the trauma of Eli’s death. The Rohingya tell the stories of their people but also tell the stories of themselves. As they tell the stories of themselves, they live their stories, taking control of their own narratives through a shared cultural strength. Subhi will take on the burden of leading his generation along this cultural line, making Rohingya culture real in a group sense but also in an individualistic one.
Eli shares Subhi’s love of a whimsical story, but family stories become the core of Subhi’s friendship with Jimmie, and the written word binds them together in a powerful way. Since Jimmie can’t read, Subhi takes the role his maá held for him and transmits Jimmie’s cultural heritage to her through the spoken word. The narrative states,
Her mum told her about the Bone Sparrow when she was little. Told her how it had protected her family for generations. Told her how it carried the souls of all her family, keeping them together and safe on their journey (28).
In hearing Jimmie’s family story, Subhi draws closer to his own culture, and the process reignites his passion for understanding his roots and passing the knowledge on to others. In turn, as Jimmie hears Subhi’s stories, she gains empathy for the plight of his people and all refugees displaced around the world. Stories help both characters heal from trauma and set their eyes on the future. Throughout the novel, the author exemplifies the profound impact storytelling has on preserving cultural heritage, particularly for displaced persons, and reveals how crafting and carrying stories can become a lifeline for anyone dealing with adversity or challenging circumstances. Stories bond people together, both within cultures and across them, and, in this sense, The Bone Sparrow bonds individual readers to the Rohingya people and their struggles. Subhi tells stories of the Rohingya but also tells stories of their plight, of right now, as it is all part of their cultural narrative. Similarly, the author hopes readers will share stories of the Rohingya and therefore also spread the truth about their experiences in oppressive displacement camps. Their stories will help them survive, and they will also, like with Jimmie, help us focus on our own heritages more closely. Stories have power across this narrative in many different ways, even in a very immediate and concrete one.
Globally, there are 75 million asylum seekers and refugees, meaning scores of humans remain separated from their homelands. Whether they arrived in the country themselves or were delivered there, they must live in a place where they aren’t wanted. The Rohingya refugees compose the largest displaced and persecuted ethnic group on the planet. Combining their plight with the Australian government’s policy of placing asylum seekers in deserted island camps exposes the harsh reality of many displaced persons. These practices often lead to the devaluing of refugees’ humanity and a diminished quality of life.
Though young, Subhi already understands the ways his people are stripped of their identities when they enter the camp. Reduced to being called by boat numbers or identification codes, the refugees endure the Jackets’ refusal to use their names, which demonstrates the first step in dehumanization. Subhi explains, “Most people have their Boat ID as their number. Maá is NAP-24 and Queeny is NAP-23. But I was born here, so I have a different ID. DAR-1, that’s me” (15). This method of referring to individuals as a number echoes the way Nazis treated Holocaust victims, dehumanizing them by referring to them as a number rather their unique and personal names. This process also allows the perpetrators to morally separate themselves from their crimes. For Muslim individuals, especially, names are important, as they are often bestowed by a family member and hold symbolic significance. Subhi appreciates when Harvey chooses to use their names, exemplifying his attempt to value the Rohingyas’ humanity and culture. Harvey’s choice serves as a contrast to the degrading acts of the Jackets.
The deplorable camp conditions further dehumanize the refugees, as the administrators force them to live in filthy, overcrowded spaces with little privacy. Denied basic human needs such as adequate hydration, nutritious food, and sanitary conditions, refugees experience illness. The guards imply that the Rohingyas’ illnesses are caused by less hygienic practices, ignoring the clearly squalid conditions and marking the refugees as something “other” than themselves.
Though Subhi and Eli make identifying their daily slop rations a game, the novel emphasizes how important sustenance is to the refugees when Subhi blissfully drinks Jimmie’s hot chocolate and later enjoys the picnic feast; basic human rights, like food and drink, are a luxury here. The guards’ treatment of the refugees’ food therefore indicates that they see the refugees as less than human. For example, the guards punish people for complaining about being hungry, thirsty, or denied proper supplies: “Complaining only gets your one bottle of water tipped into the dirt or the rest of your supply put back in the truck” (33). In another example, a guard dumps Maá’s food on the ground just for sport.
In addition to inadequate living conditions, the refugees experience confinement and isolation, which harms their physical and emotional health. Fences restrict their access to the outside world but also to each other. Subhi reveals the isolating feelings, saying, “None of us knows what it is like just on the other side of the fences” (119). The use of fences to imprison innocent people demonstrates that the government sees the Rohingya as a problem to be contained rather than as humans who deserve compassion, a point that Fraillon underscores when Subhi and Eli are separated from one another.
When refugees defy the rules and move out of their assigned spaces, some guards resort to physical violence. When Beaver discovers Subhi making an illegal package delivery, an attempt to bestow some dignity on the detainees, Beaver brutally shoves him to the ground, causing a head injury. Beaver represents the basest mentality of those in charge, as he treats the detainees worse than animals. His character serves as a stark reminder of what can happen when humans lose sight of others’ humanity and attempt to erase an entire culture.
Subhi describes the decline of many detainees, showing the effects of degradation and dehumanization. We see these effects in Subhi’s mother, in the young boy who takes Nasir’s cot, and in the detainees who resort to self-harm and even suffer death by suicide as the isolation damages their mental health.
Fraillon’s work seeks to shed light on the human rights abuses inside immigration detention facilities, underscoring the resilience of the survivors. She offers a call to action for governments around the world to advocate for the rights of the unseen, displaced people of the world. She tells the public about the Rohingya through this story, valuing humanity in an immediate way and attempting to get readers to do the same as they share the Rohingyas’ story. The Rohingya still live in camps around the world, but as this story of Subhi makes him an individual, it also makes each Rohingya an individual and their culture overall a specific, living culture.
Humans innately desire connection with others, and when enduring painful circumstances or recovering from trauma, having close friendships can help one with healing and hope. Life inside the detention facility is marked by extreme lack: lack of water, lack of food, and lack of human compassion. Yet Subhi finds a beacon of hope amid this darkness and enjoys a rich life through his friendships. He forms connections with the older members of the community and takes the time to listen to them and learn from their wisdom. His connection to Nasir illustrates Subhi’s unique ability to empathize with the older generation, who are more forgotten than anyone else inside the camp. Subhi makes a positive impact on his community by fostering relationships with others; however, it is his friendships with Eli and Jimmie that change his life and demonstrate the power of human connection to inspire hope and highlight the triumph of the human spirit. Relationships can really make an individual thrive, and Subhi has relationships with people on a general level through his culture but also on an interpersonal level with his friends.
Though Eli is older than Subhi, the two boys forge a friendship built on trust and a mutual understanding of one another. Both identify as “Limbo kids” but in different ways. Subhi was born inside the camp and does not know his homeland. Eli is in limbo because he is the only member of his family to survive the journey to the camp. Together, the friends work to find joy in the banality of daily life and inject happiness into the lives of those around them with entertaining stories and games. Like any true friend, Eli makes Subhi feel safe, and Subhi learns what true bravery is as he watches his friend stand up to bullies in the camp as well as the Jackets.
Subhi says, “Eli, he made everything OK” (85), and after he moves to Alpha, the tone of the narrative begins to shift. Once they are separated by fencing, Eli and Subhi’s relationship shifts and becomes a source of pain for the protagonist. Subhi feels as though he can’t measure up to Eli’s example and worries that he can’t be brave without Eli nearby. When the unthinkable happens and Subhi, powerless to help, witnesses Eli’s murder, Subhi feels as though he has betrayed his friend. Though he will never be the same after Eli’s tragic death, Subhi comes to understand it wasn’t his fault and that he must go on living to tell Eli’s story to the world. Now separated by death instead of a fence, Eli’s spirit remains with Subhi through his imagination as he hears his friend’s voice in the sound of the Night Sea waves and the song of the whale. The novel suggests that this experience is how cultures form; Subhi remembers Eli through his memories and stories, and Eli becomes part of his individual culture, his own narrative. The novel makes it clear that the Rohingya culture will have to continue with Subhi and that it might thus continue in a different form, and it also suggests that, through Subhi, Eli and Jimmie will be added to this culture, added to the narrative he internalizes as a nine-year-old Rohingya boy. Cultures are made up of unique people, and Subhi’s specific interactions with Eli will make him part of the larger group.
Prophetically, Subhi predicts his fated friendship with Jimmie when he says, “Sometimes I think that there’s someone outside coming to get me, and that someone would hear my screams” (90). Jimmie and Subhi come from vastly different backgrounds, yet their friendship transcends their differences. Their friendship blossoms amid the harsh realities of the detention center, providing a source of solace and hope for both characters, and their interactions illuminate the possibility of genuine connection, even in the direst of circumstances. As they learn about one another, Subhi and Jimmie learn they have more in common than they thought, as Jimmie’s family doesn’t live in a camp but her mum’s story reveals their ancestors also had to flee their homeland. More than anything, Jimmie and Subhi are connected through their love of stories, and as Subhi reads to Jimmie from her family’s history, he comes to understand and appreciate his history more. Though both children are told by society that they aren’t wanted, when Subhi and Jimmie are together, they feel a profound sense of belonging. Their friendship is marked by empathy, solidarity, and selflessness, which allows them to hold one another up when life stacks against them through illness, violence, and death. Subhi’s bond with Eli and Jimmie proves that humans can survive and thrive even in wretched conditions and experience hope and healing through genuine friendships. Jimmie and Subhi’s relationship suggests cultures can survive when they lean on each other, too, and the cultures might even become shared cultures when so much interdependency is established. Jimmie and Subhi both very much have their unique cultures, but a shared story of friendship will be added to each of their narratives on an individual level. Since both kids are their generation’s materialization of their respective cultures, these individual-level narratives will also become group level, the living embodiment of traditions and stories.