logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Gertrude Stein

The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 1933

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Modernism: A Wife’s View

Although laws at the time did not officially permit women to marry each other, Toklas was in essence Gertrude Stein’s wife and fulfilled many of the roles performed by the wives of artists, including domestic work, typing Stein’s manuscripts, and keeping other artists’ wives company. Toklas’s actual autobiography, which she kept threatening to write, would have partly been a fly-on-the-wall account of her life with Stein and the influence her partner had on the biggest names in Modernism. However, as Toklas hadn’t gotten around to writing her autobiography and Stein wanted to produce a lucrative book, Stein took it upon herself to write Toklas’s autobiography and used her partner as a mouthpiece from which to narrate her own experiences. Although the opening chapters do report Toklas’s early life, Toklas largely fades into the background as the text shifts to focus on Gertrude Stein, who is always referred to by her full name. Thus, in The Autobiography, Toklas’s subjectivity is subordinate to Stein’s.

At the end of The Autobiography, Toklas asserts, “I am a pretty good housekeeper and pretty good gardener and a pretty good needlewoman and a pretty good secretary and a pretty good editor and a pretty good vet for dogs and I have to do them all at once and I found it difficult to add being a pretty good author” (214). Her list reads like the words of a harried housewife who cannot create because she is bogged down with all the ancillary tasks that facilitate another’s creativity. In A Room of One’s Own (1929), British Modernist writer Virginia Woolf imagines that William Shakespeare had an equally talented sister who was nevertheless thwarted by her domestic responsibilities and the societal expectations for people of her sex. While Toklas, who was deeply in love with Stein and believed in her genius, was happy to promote her partner’s work, this came at the expense of telling her own story.

On the other hand, Toklas’s favorite pursuits, which included needlework and knitting, were creative in themselves and suited her calm, meditative personality. Stein was interested in the “normal” above the “abnormal” because the latter was too assertive in its wish to be interesting, and she would have found the subject of Toklas’s more normal life interesting (70). The focus on a woman engaged in the everyday tasks of her life was a continuation of the theme in Stein’s earlier work Three Lives (1909), which told the stories of three women whose lives were restricted by their social position. The Autobiography reports that while Stein and her artists discussed serious artistic and intellectual matters, Toklas and the wives would talk about traditionally feminine, everyday topics. For example, The Autobiography describes Toklas shadowing Fernande as she talks about hats and walking around Paris to show off fashionable headgear. However, as Stein cannot offer Toklas’s feelings on the matter, the reader gets little of her perspective, and she remains an elusive figure. In later chapters, the narrative refers less frequently to Toklas’s independent personal experiences, and Toklas is mentioned mostly as an accessory to Stein.

Toklas went to Paris of her own accord, wooed by the promise that the world of modern art was being built there. However, once she met Stein, she was happy to let the latter be tastemaker. Instead of creating her own publishable art, she preferred to learn about Modernism through dusting the paintings and typing Stein’s texts. In this daily engagement with the work, Toklas educated herself, opened herself to new influences, and broadened her taste. Overall, while Stein was alive, Toklas gave up her autobiography to her. Only two decades after Stein’s death did Toklas tell her own story in her own words in her real autobiography, What Is Remembered (1963).

The Spirit of Collaboration in Both War and Peace

Toklas and Stein’s artistic milieu was a populous, collaborative realm and the opposite of Romanticism’s myth of the genius male artist working in isolated solitude. Both before and after the war, the relative accessibility of the rue de Fleurus gallery and Stein’s frequent hosting of discussions with artists were important in establishing such an atmosphere; the text suggests that art is created in conversation rather than isolation.

From the outset of her Parisian sojourn, Stein understood that art was accessed through people. She formed an important connection with the grouchy collector Vollard, who led her to discover Matisse and Cézanne. Because Stein was a writer, visual artists did not feel competitive with her and could confide in her more easily than with their peers, who were rivals in the race to be the most avant-garde or popular. Still, Stein could be fickle in her tastes and offended many artists when her quest for adventure led her to someone new. Stein had a stormy relationship with Picasso, not least because she found her most perfect inspiration in Juan Gris, another Spaniard who was a proponent of Analytical Cubism. Stein considered Gris to be the purest Cubist and the one who, like her, was “possessed by the intellectual passion for exactitude in the description of inner and outer reality” (179). While Stein believed that her quest for exactitude had an intellectual basis, in Gris it derived from the mystical abstraction of the rituals of his native Spain. Stein considered this lesser-known artist as a true kindred spirit and wrote a moving tribute to him, “The Life and Death of Juan Gris” (1927). Indeed, Stein felt that her relationship with Gris was so exclusive that she resented Picasso for mourning him as well.

Although Stein and Toklas were never interested in men sexually, they still admired their good looks and talent and had passionate friendships with them. While this occurred with artists in the pre- and postwar years, during the war they adopted many military godsons and helped with the war effort by driving around France picking up soldiers and nursing them in hospitals. This shows the solidarity they felt with their adopted country and the way their spirit of collaboration extended beyond the world of art. Arguably, Stein’s cultivation of friendships with mostly male artists indicates that she wanted her work to be regarded on the same level as theirs and did not want to be dismissed by patriarchal society into the lesser sphere of female artists. She therefore sought to rise by promoting the interests of the other sex.

The rue de Fleurus remained an attraction for promising young artists such as F. Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway in the postwar years. Both young men came to Stein for advice, and Hemingway even included her in his family life by making her and Toklas godmothers to his son. However, the Hemingway years were fleeting, and he became estranged from Stein after his career eclipsed hers. Toklas, who perhaps felt the slight more than Stein, mistrusted Hemingway, at one point warning her partner not to “come home with Hemingway on your arm” (186). However, Stein could not help succumbing to his charms, and their on-off friendship endured. Overall, however, The Autobiography gives the impression that the connections of the post-armistice period were more transitory and less substantial than those of the prewar years.

Stein, Toklas, and the Lost Generation: Americans in Exile

The Autobiography depicts Americans abroad in Europe, creating a life that would have been impossible for them back home. Although members of the Lost Generation, such Fitzgerald and Hemingway, made this lifestyle famous in the 1920s, Stein and Toklas pioneered it in the 1900s, when there were very few Americans in Paris. Moreover, while Fitzgerald and Hemingway circulated between America and Europe and eventually settled in America, where they had a broad fanbase, Stein and Toklas settled in Paris, with Stein returning to America only once after her departure in 1903.

Paris’s position at the center of the art world attracted both Toklas and Stein. Toklas’s European roots were deep and prominent; a paternal ancestor fought for Napoleon, and her mother and grandmother were devoted to classical music. While Toklas got by in America, the sighting of three Matisse paintings, courtesy of Stein’s brother, made her feel that she was missing out by not being in Europe. While Stein had more substantial bonds with the United States, pursuing her education at Radcliffe and then as a medical student at Johns Hopkins, she too felt the call of art in Paris. Ironically, however, she remained stubbornly faithful to the English language, refusing to write in French or even read Parisian newspapers. Her wish to retain English for herself in a country where almost no one else spoke it enabled her to find personal significance in her native language and to abstract it from its everyday usage.

The war was a catalyst for bringing Americans to Paris, and Toklas and Stein owned their American identity by obtaining a Ford and using it to serve an American volunteer association that helped rehabilitate French soldiers. Stein’s belief that the best of America was presented when Americans went abroad helped create the identity of Americans abroad, distinct from both Europeans and those compatriots who stayed at home. Arguably, Americans abroad had an expansive perspective that arose from experiencing multiple cultures, so they were uniquely placed to influence the ways of the modern world. The latter part of The Autobiography describes Stein’s meeting with Sylvia Beach, the woman who founded the American Library in Paris, an institution that was later replaced by the famous Shakespeare and Company bookshop on the Left Bank. Arguably, this institution continued the English-speaking- American legacy that Stein had established in Paris.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text