logo

76 pages 2 hours read

Ibram X. Kendi, Jason Reynolds

Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You

Nonfiction | Book | Middle Grade | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Section 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Section 3: “1826-1879”

Chapter 11 Summary: “Mass Communication for Mass Emancipation”

Reynolds introduces the next major historical figure in his narrative: abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison. He came to prominence as an editor after he delivered a radical abolitionist address at a meeting of the American Colonization Society in 1829. Although he initially favored gradual emancipation, Garrison eventually advocated for immediate emancipation, primarily through his Liberator newspaper. According to Reynolds, The Liberator “relaunched the abolitionist movement among White people” (87). A growing commitment to immediate emancipation did not, however, equate to a demand for immediate equality. Again, Reynolds illustrates that mainstream ideas about abolition were not necessarily antiracist.

Garrison began a prolific publishing career and helped found the American Anti-Slavery Society. That entity distributed thousands of pamphlets in what Reynolds describes as a “social media before social media” (88) approach. This decisive action came as pushback from enslaved people and fear among enslavers mounted. For example, Nat Turner’s “massive crusade, an uprising that would free slaves” (88) successfully killed enslavers across Virginia in 1831 before authorities arrested him and sentenced him to death by hanging. As slaveholders “tightened the yoke,” Garrison “began flooding the market with new and improved abolitionist information” (88).

Chapter 12 Summary: “Uncle Tom”

Robust antislavery campaigns like Garrison’s met the continued assault of old racist ideas like polygenesis, slavery as a good and benevolent practice, and new “scientific” advances in the pseudoscientific field of phrenology that sought to prove “that White people had bigger skulls and therefore greater intellectual capacity” (91) than Black people. The same scientist pioneering the field of phrenology also recast historical narratives to depict white Egyptians holding Black enslaved people in captivity in the ancient world. Reynolds reminds the reader that this was all propaganda, “Anything to justify supremacy and slavery” (92).

Reynolds introduces some important historical figures in this chapter. The first is South Carolina senator John C. Calhoun—“the emcee for slavery” (92)—a man vehemently opposed to Black freedom and equality, period. The other is Frederick Douglass, who escaped his bondage and published his autobiography in 1845. Reynolds also mentions Sojourner Truth, who publicized a woman’s experience in bondage, and Harriet Beecher Stowe, the white author of the famous book Uncle Tom’s Cabin.

Reynolds outlines the major plot events of Uncle Tom’s Cabin all to stress that the “moral of the story” was that “We all must be slaves…to God” (96). The book was more about shaming white Christians than advocating for Black humanity. Despite that problematic premise, it became immensely popular and garnered support among northerners, particularly women, for the abolitionist movement.

Chapter 13 Summary: “Complicated Abe”

The title of the chapter refers to President Abraham Lincoln. Reynolds pushes back against the image of “Honest Abe” that glorified Lincoln since the late 19th century. He explains that Lincoln entered the antislavery mindset “not because of the human horror,” but, “[b]ecause if labor was free, what exactly were poor White people expected to do to make money?” (100). He pitched the benefits of abolition in terms of how it could help white communities, while also being openly “against racial equality” and promising “not to challenge southern slavery” (102).

The chapter quickly mentions the Civil War, emphasizing that in the beginning of the war, Union soldiers often upheld the Fugitive Slave Act, returning runaways to their owners. By the end of the war, however, “Black people were emancipating themselves” (104) permanently. Enslaved people escaped bondage and joined Union lines.

Lincoln received the credit for this emancipation and garnered praise among Black people who acknowledged his role in ending slavery in the US. Reynolds reminds the reader that these efforts and sympathies also led to a “shot in the back of the head” (105) shortly after the end of the war.

Chapter 14 Summary: “Garrison’s Last Stand”

After the war, momentum shifted. In the immediate post-war period, antiracists in Congress tried to pass legislation ensuring Black voting rights and equality but met barriers in the form of black codes—“social codes used to stop Black people from living freely” (108)—that morphed into Jim Crow Laws which legalized segregation.

Andrew Johnson, the 17th president of the US, was a force of “evil” working against Black freedom, writes Reynolds. Without centralized support and resources from the government, “Black people had to fight to build their own institutions” (109), including Historically Black Colleges and Universities and political platforms. In 1870, Congress passed the 15th Amendment, which safeguarded the Black men’s right to vote, albeit with significant “racist loopholes” (110).

The appearance of progress led Garrison to dissolve the American Anti-Slavery Society and largely bow out of politics in old age and poor health. The 1870s, however, brought new levels of white terrorism and “more propaganda about brute and savage Blacks” (111).

Resistance to oppression took the forms of Black empowerment and women’s empowerment, which Reynolds highlights in large, bold font in the text. Many Black people moved in droves out of the South, especially to Kansas. Garrison supported this domestic migration but died without ever witnessing Black equality.

Section 3 Analysis

Spanning the Civil War and its aftermath, this section of the book focuses most centrally on William Lloyd Garrison. The war itself does not occupy any significant space in the narrative—only a few sentences—but Reynolds stresses the roles Black people had in shaping the war and bringing victory to the Union Army, which swelled with thousands of fugitives leaving plantations.

In discussing Uncle Tom’s Cabin as a decisive staple in the prewar period, Reynolds illustrates the critical role literature played in shaping public sentiment and circulating ideas about race. By exploring how problematic the book was for anyone wanting to assert unconditional Black humanity and antiracism, Reynolds complicates the well-known facts and figures of the mid-19th century.

For example, Reynolds debunks various myths concerning Abraham Lincoln. Known as “The Great Emancipator” and heralded in the mainstream as an antiracist hero, Lincoln’s antislavery views evolved amid a series of political pivots. Moreover, he remained “against Black voting…against racial equality” (101) until after the war. Contextualizing Lincoln in this way also helps readers understand the crucial roles that Black people—many of them formerly enslaved—played in winning the war and bringing about their own freedom.

The quick pace of the chapters in this section delivers the impression that massive changes happened rapidly with severe consequences. Although Abolitionist sentiment had brewed for decades, the unified movement circulated in the mainstream by Garrison, Frederick Douglass, Sojourner Truth, and others completely reframed the issue for many Americans. Of this movement, Reynolds writes:

[It] transformed abolitionism from a messy political stance (like Jefferson’s) to a simple moral stance: Slavery was evil, and those racists justifying or ignoring slavery were evil, and it was the moral duty of the United States to eliminate the evil of slavery (109).

Lincoln’s election led to Southern secession. Secession led to war. Victory in war dismantled slavery but did not bring about Black equality, or even safety. In many places in the Reconstruction and early Jim Crow eras following the war, white terrorism won the day.

Reynolds reminds the reader, “If people aren’t careful, they can be tricked into believing a big deal is a done deal” (110). Garrison loosened his push for Black freedom when the country outlawed slavery, but this easing of pressure was premature. This same pattern of proclaiming a sweeping victory following major events would resurface in the 20th century.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text