64 pages • 2 hours read
Richard FlanaganA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
In 1895, H. G. Wells published The War of the Worlds (1898), a novel about a Martian invasion of Earth.
Physicist Enrico Fermi, “the architect of the atomic bomb,” argued that no intelligent life form existed in outer space because no evidence of them had ever been found; this is known as the Fermi Paradox (217). Leo Szilard and his fellow Jewish-Hungarian scientists, including Edward Teller, “the father of the hydrogen bomb,” joked that they were the offspring Martians left behind to develop the atomic bomb.
H. G. Wells had been in part inspired to write The War of the Worlds by the history of the attempted genocide of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Wells felt the colonizing Europeans invading Tasmania and killing the people there were analogous to the Martians invading Earth in his story.
Although most Tasmanian Aboriginal people were killed in the Black War, a few hundred survived to pass down their millennia-old traditions and language. Flanagan characterizes the British colonization as a form of sacrilege of a sacred place.
Flanagan reflects that even though the Jewish-Hungarian scientists joked that they were the Martians, they weren’t; “they were just one more people the real Martians exterminated” (221).
Flanagan draws a connection between the British goals of “obliteration” of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people as analogized in Wells’s The War of the Worlds and the nuclear apocalypse in The World Set Free. Flanagan’s ancestor Thomas arrived as a “convict slave” in Tasmania and 110 years later Flanagan himself was born. His mother cried when she learned she was pregnant with him.
“Convict slaves” had to stay in the colonies after they were freed. In Tasmania, over time, the Aboriginal people and the freed enslaved people formed a hybrid culture even as racism and classism continued to impact their society. Flanagan characterizes this process as “a matter of question 7” (225).
After Flanagan father’s death, Flanagan found a letter from a cousin begging him to never disclose that their grandmother was of Aboriginal decent. Flanagan wonders if his father’s animist beliefs were a reflection of this heritage and what this means about his family’s cultural identity.
Flanagan describes Franz Kafka’s story “In the Penal Colony” where prisoners are tortured with needles that inscribe their crimes on their bodies. He sees this as a description of Tasmanian history which is steeped in a colonial past that is denied or justified by the English who perpetrated it while simultaneously blaming white Australians for its repercussions.
Flanagan argues the “Martians” (referring to the English) forced European convicts into employment in a colonial system to persecute Aboriginal people. That same System was responsible for their own persecution. He tells the story of Black Mary Cockerill, an Aboriginal woman, who in 1818 turned her lover, the convict Michael Howe, into the authorities after he ran away from the farmer to whom he had been assigned. Howe killed Cockerill and then Howe was himself beheaded, and his head displayed on a pike in Hobart. The “shame” of the mob spitting on Howe’s head was carried by Tasmanians even though it “was not ours and […] would always be ours” (230).
Flanagan attended Oxford University. There, he heard supervisors and fellow students use slurs and criticize his work for its “feminism” and focus on Australian history.
Flanagan found England a depressing, grey, industrialized place without any “wild country” into which he could escape.
Flanagan describes a “law don” at his college who acted upper-class but was denigrated by the others as “the dirty little East End Jew” (232). The more the man acted like the Oxford upper-class, “the more they despised him” (232).
While he was at Oxford, the “Bullers” [members of the exclusive Bullingdon Club] dressed like “Nazis.” One Buller who later became prime minister [Boris Johnson] was shocked when Flanagan refused to support his run for Oxford Union president. Flanagan did not want to “pretend to be a Martian” (233).
Flanagan argues that the “true language of Oxford” was not the witty epigrams the university is known for but the slurs he heard students and faculty use.
Flanagan summarizes a Chekhov short story called “A Case History.” In the story, a doctor treats the daughter of a factory owner. He realizes her wealth is the cause of her illness. He argues that those who perpetuate injustice injure themselves as well. Afterwards, forgetting the events “is both forgiveness and vengeance, failure and freedom” (236).
Flanagan connects the writing of Question 7 with H. G. Wells’s The World Set Free and all of the related events in between including his father’s internment in a POW camp, the development of the nuclear bomb, and the bombing of Hiroshima.
When Flanagan was 21, he was working as a white-water kayaking guide on the Franklin River. His kayak got stuck between boulders at the bottom of waterfall.
Flanagan’s legs were pinned into the kayak, and he couldn’t get out. He had to fight the river to avoid drowning.
Flanagan was trapped in the kayak and thought he was going to die.
Another kayaker, P—, tried to free Flanagan by moving the kayak for hours, but he was unsuccessful.
Eventually, P— got a rope and tried to have the rest of the group pull Flanagan out of the kayak, but that did not work either.
After some time in the cold water, Flanagan realized he was dying.
Flanagan focused on “the weight of existence” to fight the pull of death (250).
Flanagan thought of his parents and an ex-girlfriend, J—. These thoughts gave him courage to keep fighting.
Flanagan heard a helicopter above him and thought about how his story would be “a suppertime snuff story” on the evening news (251).
P— continued to try and free Flanagan, but P— was running out of strength.
Flanagan told P— he was “going.” P— refused to accept it and then disappeared from Flanagan’s sight again.
After P— left, Flanagan prepared to die. He felt “ready to return to the sky and the sea” (255).
P— told Flanagan he was going to try again to free him.
P— was finally able to lift the kayak. When the angle was right, the group pulled on the rope to free Flanagan. He popped out of the kayak.
Flanagan was swept through the rapids and resurfaced, naked, in the middle of the river.
When Flanagan closed his eyes, he felt he was still in the kayak, so he reopened them in panic. He wondered if he had actually died.
Flanagan was carried out of the water, naked, unsure if he was alive or dead. He thought what was happening to him was “just a hallucination” (258).
Flanagan and P— drifted apart after P— saved his life. Flanagan later apologized to P— for this, but P— understood that “any form of gratitude for having your life saved feels inadequate and false” (260). One drunken night at a bar, Flanagan told J— he had thought of her as inspiration to fight for his life while almost drowning. She was kind but did not really understand.
Afterward, Flanagan did not want to talk about what he had been through.
After surviving, Flanagan visited places and people he thought he “would never see again” (261) and found it comforting. He was grateful for their kindness and love.
While recovering from the ordeal in the hospital, Flanagan felt he was “still stuck screaming in a distant, wild river” (262). He left against doctor’s orders and went to the bus stop.
Flanagan kept returning to kayak the Franklin River even though he would get nightmares in anticipation of his visits that ended after he passed the rapids where he had almost drowned. It took him decades to realize he had died that day. His first novel was about his experience.
One night at a bar, a woman told Flanagan she had slept with the protagonist of his first novel and that she had heard the author was “an arsehole” (266). Later, another woman called and accused him of stealing details of her best friend’s death for his novel.
Flanagan’s parents never asked him about the accident. Later, when Flanagan won a scholarship to study at Oxford, his parents had a muted response to the news. He imagines his father was simply content that Flanagan was “alive and [he] wanted to live” (267).
Flanagan remembers being four years old and listening to the sea. He worried the sea would overtake take them. In the morning, he ran to the beach and saw the ocean was still far away.
As a young man, Flanagan went camping near the Forth River which led to that beach he’d visited as a child and thought about how there was a life before and after he died. He felt the world had a new “extraordinary clarity.”
Flanagan laid there watching the stars and feeling a connection to the Earth. Despite the speed of the Earth’s rotation, he decided to hold on for dear life.
After his time at Oxford, Flanagan returned to work as a guide on the Franklin River. He looked at a fork in the river and felt “poised between [his] past death and [his] future life” (275). He realized it was time to begin writing.
Part 9 of Question 7 describes Flanagan’s experience while earning a master’s degree at the University of Oxford, H. G. Wells’s novel The War of the Worlds, and how the framework of a Martian invasion relates to the genocide of the Tasmanian Aboriginal people. Part 10 covers his experience of almost drowning in a kayak accident at 21. The Epilogue deepens the motif of water as a representation of change and ends with Flanagan’s decision to become a writer.
Part 9 centers the theme of Historical Connections Across Space and Time. Flanagan connects the macrohistory of British colonialism and its repercussions in Tasmania with the microhistory of his personal experiences. Flanagan notes that H. G. Wells was in part inspired by the genocide of the Tasmanian people by British colonialists to write War of the Worlds. Flanagan extends this metaphor to characterize British people as “Martians,” like the Martians who invaded Earth. In Part 6, Chapter 11, Flanagan argues that the history taught at Oxford was based in a European sense of time where history is “a straight railway line” (162). He counters that the concept of history and time does not apply in Tasmania where “history constantly recured not as answers or comfort, not as a story of progress, but as a massacre site” (162).
Flanagan unpacks this idea further in Part 9 by describing his experience studying at Oxford. Based on European historical notions of progress, the violence and racism inherent in the British colonial project was over. Instead, what Flanagan finds at the premier British university are staff and students who articulate regressive, racist ideas in their language. Flanagan rejects attempts to co-opt him into this worldview. He “wear[ies] of … the unquestioned Martian superiority” (228). Far from being over, he demonstrates that British colonialism and its violence is recursive, highlighting the example of Tasmania and its people as evidence.
In Part 10, Flanagan recounts his near-death experience of almost drowning in detail, connecting it to the text’s thematic interest in The Nature of Writing. Flanagan’s first novel, Death of a River Guide (1994), was based on his experience during the kayak accident, supporting the idea that many first novels are highly autobiographical. Earlier in the text, Flanagan writes that he could barely speak about his experience, and felt himself “a wretched liar, an imposter, a fake.” He asserted that he was “never going to talk about it again because to talk about it was only to lie” (102). This reflection on his own process as a young writer reflects his attempts to come to terms with the ways things that are deeply felt—such as his feelings about Tasmania and its people—resist novelization. However, as a mature writer, Flanagan embraces Chekhov’s method of counterbalancing nonfiction with poetic language to more accurately express the affective truth of events—evidenced by his description of almost dying in Part 10. He revisits his near-death experience—writing about it in detail, using evocative imagery and sensory language to convey its truth.
Throughout Question 7, Flanagan represents the “fourth tense” of the simultaneity of time through the use of repetition. For example, Flanagan uses repetitive language to connect his own experience with his father’s after each survives a near-death experience. After Flanagan’s father returned home from the POW camp, he took “a train trip around all of Tasmania that he could visit. Perhaps he wanted to see people and places he had thought he would never see again. Perhaps it was an immeasurable comfort to him to be allowed to sit in their homes […] and say little or nothing” (42). In Part 10, Chapter 20, after surviving his own ordeal, Flanagan similarly “went to see places [he] had thought [he] would never see again. […] It was such a comfort to be allowed to sit in their home […] (261). This narrative repetition connects Flanagan’s father’s life with Flanagan’s and the distant past with the near past. It illustrates how generations are linked and events, both negative and positive, are cyclically connected, pointing to the text’s thematic engagement with Memory, Understanding, and Forgiveness.