64 pages • 2 hours read
Richard FlanaganA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of genocide, anti-Aboriginal racism, and war crimes.
Author Richard Flanagan writes in first person about his visit in 2012 to the former site of the Ohama [Prisoner of War] Camp in Japan where his father was held as a prisoner during World War II and forced to serve as a “slave labourer” in an Ohama coal mine. Flanagan visits a local museum to find out more, but the woman who works there knows nothing about the use of enslaved peoples in the mines. Flanagan reflects that “it was as if it had never happened” (3).
Flanagan reflects on why people search for their beginnings. He thinks people are looking for “the truth of the why,” but there is no such thing, only the “why” itself (4).
Flanagan describes the moment on August 6, 1945 when US Major Thomas Ferebee dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima. At that moment, Flanagan’s father was working in the coal mine, fearing death.
Flanagan describes the “love hotel”—a place for clients to meet sex workers—that stood at the former entrance to the coal mine when he visited in 2012. He notes that the “oblivion” of sex is a moment that “prefigures and denies death” (5).
Flanagan stands in front of the hotel during a press event with an elderly Japanese man named Mr. Sato who had once been a guard at the POW camp. The press wants Flanagan and Mr. Sato to embrace, but Flanagan is embarrassed and reluctant to do so.
Flanagan recalls meeting with elderly people earlier that day who remembered WWII. He felt ashamed to meet them, but he wasn’t sure why. He remembers that his father had told him how kind the Japanese miners—possibly these same people’s fathers—had been to him and the other POWs.
Flanagan reflects on his work as a chainman—the person who carries the measuring line for surveyors—as a young man. He would find surveyors markers from decades ago carved into trees and the sap would still be weeping. He notes that “time hadn’t healed the tree, only scarred it” (8).
To make the press happy, Flanagan puts his arm around Mr. Sato. After the photograph is taken, Mr. Sato curls into Flanagan and doesn’t move. They stand together until the press leave.
Flanagan’s father joked about one of his fellow POWs who claimed to have seen the atomic bomb over Hiroshima at night when the bomb was dropped at 8:16 am.
Flanagan’s father survived three years in Japanese internment. During that time, the Japanese started losing the war. They directed their populace to commit suicide rather than be invaded. Instead of invading, the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Fifteen years after the atomic bombs were dropped, Flanagan was born. He was named after his father, also named Richard.
During his visit in Japan, a city employee named Kenji takes Flanagan to a “hostess bar.” Kenji tells Flanagan that his grandfather had fought in WWII in New Guinea, but he did not talk about it, and he became increasingly reclusive upon his return.
Flanagan tells one of the hostesses that he’s writing a book about “love” and that he’s in Sanyo-Onoda City because his father had been a “slave labourer” in the nearby coal mine. She asks what that means.
Flanagan responds that it’s “nothing important.” He reflects on how he “star[es] into time” (17) like Kenji’s grandfather.
In the tone of a historical narrative, Flanagan describes how Nazi scientists contemplated the creation of an atomic bomb at a conference on June 4, 1942. Physicist Werner Heisenberg proposed it, but [Minister of Armaments] Albert Speer felt its development would take too long. During the war, German nuclear scientists were captured and kept in a house in Cambridge that was bugged by British military intelligence.
When the German scientists learned on August 6, 1945 that the Americans had developed and dropped an atomic bomb, they were torn between disbelief, anger at having been bested, and horror.
The United States government poured massive amounts of human and economic resources into the production of the nuclear bomb through the top-secret Manhattan Project. Flanagan describes the inner workings of the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima, killing an estimated 60,000 Japanese people.
Flanagan notes that the exact number of casualties of Hiroshima is unknown—estimates vary from 60,000 to 140,000 people. He claims the event “defies measurement.”
Russian writer Anton Chekhov wrote a short story that includes a typical mathematical word problem, but which ends “Who loves longer, a man or a woman” (23). Flanagan describes the quandary “why do we do what we do to each other” as a “question 7” (23).
Flanagan describes how in Chekhov’s stories, the world is not what it appears to be on the surface. Chekhov felt literature should ask good questions rather than providing answers.
Flanagan claims that the US made the atomic bomb because a man named Leo Szilard was inspired by an H.G. Wells novel and persuaded the president to pursue its development.
Flanagan describes the first meeting of British science fiction writer H.G. Wells and a polemic young woman. He notes Wells was reading a book about discoveries in radium when she came into the room.
Flanagan identifies the woman meeting H.G. Wells as 19-year-old Cicely Fairfield who wrote under the nom de plume Rebecca West. She admired Nietzsche and wrote strident book reviews criticizing old-fashioned literature, including that of Wells.
The week before they met, West wrote a “scathing review” of Wells’s most recent novel, Marriage, for a radical feminist magazine. Wells was 46, married to his second wife, and having an affair with socialite Elizabeth von Arnim.
Wells’s career was on a downturn. His two most recent novels criticized conservative Victorian sexual morality, but West accused him of still living a conventional life. Wells decided to invite West for lunch.
West arrived at Wells house and met his wife, Jane. When she was shown into Wells’s library, she felt shocked at how ugly he was.
West and Wells plunged into conversation. As they talked, they began to like each other. They met again a few weeks later and kissed in his library.
Flanagan describes the kiss as catalyzing a chain reaction that connects death to Flanagan himself, to the book he is writing, and the life of his father. He suggests the source of the lovers’ passion was “question 7.”
Question 7 has a complex structure that reflects the main themes and modes of analysis explored in the text. Flanagan notes he was partially inspired by a short story by Russian writer Anton Chekhov “Questions Posed by a Mad Mathematician.” The series of absurd questions counterposes factual statements (“Wednesday, June 17, 1881, a train had to leave station A at 3 A.M. in order to reach station B at 11 P.M.”) with affective (emotional, subjective) questions such as “Who is capable of loving longer, a man or a woman?” Similarly, Question 7 toggles between factual historical narrative and the exploration of personal, emotional questions. For instance, the text opens with Flanagan’s trip to a museum to learn about the Ohama coal mine where his father was held as a POW and forced into hard labor. While discussing the factual elements of this history, Flanagan reflects on the nature of the impossibility of understanding one’s life despite the human tendency to return to beginnings to “find the truth of why” (4). Flanagan frames the questions he asks throughout the text as similarly impossible to answer, reflecting his attempt to understand foundational qualities of time, humanity, and The Nature of Writing.
The second structural element that Flanagan uses throughout the text is the analogy of the chain reaction. Chain reactions are key to nuclear explosions. As explained later in the text, in a chain reaction, a nucleus splits which then causes two more nuclei to split and so on. Flanagan uses this structure within the text to illustrate the theme of Historical Connections Across Space and Time as events trigger one another in an ongoing chain. For instance, when discussing H. G. Wells’s kissing Rebecca West, Flanagan writes, “That kiss would, in time, beget death which would, in turn, beget me and the circumstances of my life that lead to the book you now hold, a chain reaction which began over a century ago” (37). Although these events seem to be disparate and unrelated, Flanagan describes them as connected by a shared chain reaction. He extends the analogy to the structure of his book, positioning the small chapters as “atoms” that split throughout the text, sometimes in surprising ways.
Flanagan uses the fourth tense in the Yolŋu language to underscore the synthesis between structure and theme in the text as he grapples with the interconnected concepts of Memory, Understanding, and Forgiveness. Flanagan notes in the acknowledgments that an essay entitled “The Past is in the Present is in the Future” by Yolŋu woman Siena Stubs “informs this book deeply” (277). The Yolŋu are an Aboriginal Australian group who live in northern Australia. As Stubs explains in the essay, in the Yolŋu language, there is a tense that expresses the simultaneity of time: “this boy was walking along the beach, is walking along the beach, and will walk along the beach, simultaneously” (Stubs, “The Past is in the Present is in the Future,” National Gallery of Victoria). Although this tense does not exist in English, Flanagan uses a parallel structure throughout the text, allowing him to demonstrate his reflections on his own life as connected to his father’s history and the context of events in human history. For example, Flanagan learns that the grandfather of his liaison, Kenji, fought in WWII but never spoke about it, preferring to instead live in isolation in the mountains. Flanagan is similarly reluctant to talk about his father’s experiences as a POW in Japan. Using the fourth tense, Flanagan draws a connection between Kenji’s grandfather and himself:
Nothing I said could be heard nor anything I saw seen, and together, Kenji Y—’s grandfather and me, we kept staring into time, knowing only what had happened was always happening and would never stop happening (17).
Beyond the syntactical application of the fourth tense as seen above, the looping structure of the text which moves backwards and forwards in time similarly expresses this idea.