63 pages • 2 hours read
Rachel MaddowA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: All chapters of the source material contain mentions of antisemitism and antisemitic violence, including direct quotes of antisemitic comments and antisemitic slurs. Some chapters mention racism against Black people, especially Chapter 3, which also includes a photograph of a lynching. This guide summarizes the events of the book without reproducing racial slurs or outdated terms to describe race.
The Prologue opens by describing the plot of The House of the Vampire, a 1907 work of gay vampire fiction written by German-born George Sylvester Viereck. In this “voluptuous, pretentious, deeply stupid romp,” a male vampire seduces young, talented men and steals their artistic talent (xvii). Despite the poor reception of this book, Viereck achieved literary notoriety by his mid-twenties. In addition, he became an outspoken advocate for Germany as World War I began. When a German U-boat torpedoed the Lusitania in 1915, drowning hundreds of civilians, Viereck defended Germany, saying the country’s actions were justified.
Weeks after this incident, Viereck accidentally left a briefcase behind on a Manhattan train. The contents of the briefcase, later examined by US officials, revealed an extensive, well-funded German propaganda scheme to deter the US from entering the world war. They also revealed that Viereck was a funded agent of the German government, and that Germany had bankrolled his literary career.
After World War I, Viereck began, much like the character in The House of Vampire, associating with men he viewed as talented, powerful, and famous. He traveled between Europe and the US, interviewing these men. He interviewed Kaiser Wilhelm II, who believed that Germany should have kept fighting during World War I until they had used up every resource and every soldier. Viereck also interviewed Adolf Hitler, who believed that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair and that Bolshevism needed to be beaten. Hitler told Viereck that in order to destroy Bolshevism, Germany must rid itself of Jewish people.
A decade later, by the time Hitler’s forces began to sweep across Europe throughout 1939 and 1940, Viereck was fully supportive of Hitler and became the mastermind of Nazi Germany’s propaganda campaign in the US. The Nazi government spent even more money on these efforts than it had in World War I, spreading millions of pieces of propaganda throughout the US in a targeted attempt to sway popular support toward isolationist and antisemitic causes.
The Prologue concludes by alluding to the events of January 6, 2021:
[C]alculated efforts to undermine democracy, to foment a coup, to spread disinformation across the country, to overturn elections by force of arms with members of Congress helping and running interference—all these things add up to a terrible episode for a country like ours to live through, but they are not unprecedented (xxx).
These modern-day events had a “prequel”: Leading up to, and during, World War II, propaganda-fueled ultra-right proponents in the US made detailed plans and took action to try to overthrow the US government. Moreover, they received support from many pro-fascist federal elected officials. The rest of the book tells the story of how these authoritarians and fascists gained power and how “mostly unremembered” US citizens fought against them.
Philip Johnson, a young Harvard graduate, excitedly attended a Hitler Youth rally in Potsdam, Germany, in 1932. One of Johnson’s favorite philosophers was Friedrich Nietzsche, who believed in Übermenschen, or “supermen,” elite individuals who were fit to shape the world because they refused to bow to morals, laws, or convention. Johnson believed that Hitler was the prime example of such a man.
Johnson later became a celebrated architect, but as a young man, he mostly used his inherited wealth to curate the architectural work of others. In his free time, he and his friend Alan Blackburn complained about President Roosevelt, dreamed of the day when the US would have a fascist leader like Hitler, and made plans for an organization they called the Gray Shirts.
Others largely regarded Johnson as harmless, rich, and a bit silly—not a threat to society. However, one of Johnson’s acquaintances, another Harvard graduate named Lincoln Kirstein, held a different view of Johnson. Kirstein, who was Jewish, observed that Johnson liked to exert power over other people. Kirstein and his father had noted that fascism and antisemitism were on the rise in both Europe and the US throughout the early 1930s.
Another Harvard graduate, Lawrence Dennis, was a proponent of US fascism; he wanted a Hitler-like figure to take over the US. He told men like Johnson and Blackburn that this sort of plan would take a long time to implement. He believed that the most likely person to fill the role of American fascist dictator was Huey Long, a US senator and governor of Louisiana.
In the 1930s, Huey Long, US senator and governor of Louisiana, provided “a glimpse of what post-democracy strongman rule might look like in the United States” (11). He held onto his job as governor even after he was elected to the US Senate. He used his bodyguards to physically intimidate and control others, planned the kidnappings of his enemies, and once used National Guard troops to overtake his state’s capitol. The text presents Long, who rose to power on a populist platform, as an example of how far the US could venture into political extremism and even a case study of what dictatorship might look like in the US.
While communism had some supporters in the US throughout the 1930s, their presence was not as strong as its detractors feared. Mostly, communists in the US agitated for better working conditions and civil rights for the poor as well as racial minorities. Still, the communist movement did not have much sway, even at its height, when tens of thousands of people belonged to the party.
Nevertheless, as a politician, Long recognized the power that could come from supporting the poor and the marginalized, and he campaigned on a platform of wealth equality. His political movement, Share Our Wealth, strove to rectify the vast poverty that had resulted from the Great Depression. This grassroots message was immensely popular after years of scarcity and hardship. Long told his followers that everyone should have the basic resources necessary for a comfortable life: a home, a car, and other conveniences. He advocated for free education and guaranteed income for all families and even proposed an exponential federal tax that would heavily tax the wealth of the richest individuals: “None shall be too rich, and none shall be too poor,” he told his audiences (13).
Millions joined Long’s Share Our Wealth Society. During his time as governor of Louisiana, he followed through on his promises, building new roads, bridges, and hospitals; these hospitals served patients regardless of whether they could afford the care. He provided free textbooks to schools and instituted a free literacy program that taught 100,000 adults to read. In addition, he raised taxes on corporations and repealed the state’s poll tax, which massively increased voter registration.
However, Long achieved these goals through a dictatorial style of rule. He took control of all elections and all appointed offices in the state, and he expected bribes and kickbacks from every person he installed in office. Additionally, he exerted control over Louisiana’s police and prosecutors. He maintained his power and popularity despite the rumors that swirled around him regarding planned kidnappings and murder attempts on his enemies.
American fascist Lawrence Dennis admired and analyzed Long’s power. He acknowledged that one of the keys to Long’s power was his control of the state militia. Philip Johnson and his friend Alan Blackburn, enamored with Long, decided to start a new political party, the National Party, and said they would make Huey Long their new leader. They stocked their car with weapons catalogs, dreaming about which weapons they would arm themselves with while on the road, and drove south to speak with Long.
The Nazis regarded the US as the world’s foremost creator of racist law and thus sent an attorney to study at the University of Arkansas School of Law to learn how to emulate US racist policies. This attorney, Heinrich Krieger, studied US treatment of Black people, immigrants, and the inhabitants of newly acquired territories. Krieger concluded that US law was based on the concept of protecting white people from all other races. The text points out that prominent US politicians have espoused this view, including Theodore Roosevelt, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and Calvin Coolidge.
Krieger realized that the US preserved the idealistic language of its founding documents (which speak of liberty and happiness for all) while simultaneously relegating non-white people, especially Black people, to second-class citizenship, through the use of juridical Umwege, “secret and twisting passageways of reasoning that led to whatever outcome was politically desirable” (24-25).
To codify racism, Krieger found, all a country had to do was legally define races and enact a law to protect one of them from the others, thus providing enough legal cover for authorities to maneuver toward outcomes supporting that race.
Following this template, the Nazis enacted the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor in 1935. This law forbade marriages and sexual relations between Jewish and non-Jewish people. Then, they passed another law that revoked the political rights and citizenship of Jewish Germans.
Around the same time, the Nazi party established the swastika as Germany’s official symbol. They did this in reaction to an incident in New York, in which New Yorkers protested a German ocean liner that was flying the swastika flag. Judge Brodsky, the judge who presided over the protestors’ cases, let most of them off without punishment and used his ruling to lecture Hitler, speaking strongly against Hitler’s suppression of religious freedom. The Nazis denigrated Brodsky, who was Jewish. The US Secretary of State felt the need to apologize to Hitler on behalf of Brodsky, and Hitler thanked President Roosevelt and his administration. Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi minister of propaganda, declared the swastika flag the national flag of Germany.
In the opening chapters of Prequel, the theme of The Allure of Power emerges as the text traces the stories of George Sylvester Viereck, Philip Johnson, and Huey Long. Viereck was drawn to power and became an advocate for Germany and later a Nazi agent. Well before Hitler’s rise, Viereck, clearly enraptured with Hitler’s power, wrote admiringly of him in 1923: “There is no one in Germany who does not recognize the importance of his emblem […] He drew applause across the social strata […] He overcomes them with his eloquence. He storms their reserve with his passion” (xxiv). Similarly, Johnson admired the Nietzschean concepts of the Übermensch and found in Hitler a figure who embodied this ideal:
He was struck by the notion that Adolf Hitler might just be the Über-Übermensch, the figure to reshape politics in Germany and beyond. He was also struck with the feeling that he, Philip Johnson, was somehow destined for his own role in this epochal undertaking (5).
Huey Long, a charismatic political figure, exemplified the allure of power through his dictatorial rule in Louisiana. The convergence of these stories underscores the magnetic appeal of powerful figures, shaping the ideologies of those like Viereck and Johnson, who envisioned themselves as essential players in the political landscape.
Chapter 3 explicitly draws parallels between anti-Black racism in the US and the antisemitism of the Nazi Party, exposing the shared ideological underpinnings of these forms of discrimination. Heinrich Krieger’s study of American racist law at the University of Arkansas School of Law revealed the pervasiveness of the belief in race protection, whereby white people must be shielded from other races. This concept, endorsed by prominent US figures from Theodore Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson, served as the template for the Nazis’ Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. The text deftly links the legal manipulation and codification of racism in both contexts, emphasizing the intertwined nature of these discriminatory practices.
Commonalities between Viereck and Johnson become apparent in their shared admiration for powerful men and their desire for significance. Viereck, an advocate for Germany, sought association with influential individuals, while Johnson idolized Hitler as the epitome of an Übermensch. Both were captivated by the allure of power, and the book’s juxtaposition of their stories highlights a recurring theme: the fascination with and yearning for influence that characterizes certain individuals on the far-right fringes.
The chapters provide insights into the analytical and strategic nature of the fascist movement. Lawrence Dennis, an American fascist, astutely analyzed Huey Long’s power, recognizing the importance of Long’s control of the state militia. This analytical approach underscores the strategic thinking within the fascist ranks. Moreover, the Nazis’ methodical study of US racist law, as seen through Heinrich Krieger, reveals a calculated effort to craft and implement discriminatory legislation. These examples illuminate the deliberate and tactical nature of fascist ideologies as they sought to gain influence and power in the period between World War I and World War II.
In addition, the text introduces the theme of Prominent Americans Versus American Ideals, foreshadowed in the prologue. The text introduces the idea that elected officials aided Nazi propaganda efforts and highlights the white supremacist views held by some prominent US figures. This theme suggests a disturbing convergence of influential US citizens and fascist ideologies, laying the groundwork for the exploration of how propaganda and authoritarianism found support within the fabric of US society. Moreover, Chapter 3 shows how the US codified racism while maintaining idealistic views in its founding documents, promising equal opportunity for all while establishing systems to provide more protections for the rights and interests of white people.
By Rachel Maddow
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Loyalty & Betrayal
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Power
View Collection
World War II
View Collection