37 pages • 1 hour read
Friedrich NietzscheA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Chapter 9, Nietzsche reiterates the position of modern man in relation to history: “Hard by the pride of modern man we find his irony about himself” (54). The awareness of history puts modern man in what Nietzsche calls an “evening mood,” which verges on cynicism. This veering into cynicism is problematic because it limits opportunities for change and growth. Modern man, Nietzsche argues, posits human history as the evolution of natural history: “We are the apex of nature” (55). This knowledge, though, “does not complete nature but only kills [man’s] own” (55).
Citing Edouard von Hartmann’s Philosophie des Unbewussten (1869), Nietzsche claims that Hartmann’s idea of the Unconscious is symptomatic of an excess of historical knowledge. Hartmann’s appraisal of modernity in the light of doomsday is, for Nietzsche, a “parody” of history. It is typical of the antiquarian, conservative history Nietzsche outlined in Chapter 2.
Nietzsche interrogates Hartman’s notion that the individual should surrender their personality to the “world process for the sake of its goal, the redemption of the world” (57). Nietzsche argues that Hartmann’s idea of the “world process” is “to the detriment of existence and life” and hence proclaims it “a joke” (59). Rather, Nietzsche envisions history as a “bridge” across the Heraclitan stream of becoming, formed by its greatest contributors: “the goal of humanity cannot lie at the end but only in its highest specimens” (57).
The notion of life purpose is laughable, besides a death by exhaustion through striving for greatness. Success should not be measured in worldly terms, which greatness exceeds. Paradoxically, Christianity is successful in the world because of its doctrine that worldly success is of the devil. Worldly egoism is the drive behind historical movements. A modicum of egoism is helpful, or “prudent,” as Nietzsche puts it, in guiding the “laboring strata” toward practicality and enterprise.
Nietzsche concludes the chapter by returning to the discussion of Hartmann’s thought. Hartmann praises worldly labor and criticizes the elderly. In contrast, Nietzsche champions youth and asserts that historical aberrations are in fact used by society to shape the youth into worldly egotism. Nietzsche warns that an excess of history can rob the youth of its best traits: justice, selflessness, and love.
Chapter 9 is dedicated to rubbishing the theory of history put forth in Edouard von Hartmann’s Philosophie des Unbewussten or Philosophy of the Unconscious. Hartmann is variously described as a “jester” (59), a “rogue of rogues” and a “mocking spirit” (59). The main tenet of Nietzsche’s disagreement seems to be Hartmann’s idea of a “world process,” which for Nietzsche is emblematic of the era’s overemphasis on history. In its place, Nietzsche inserts the Heraclitan principle of becoming: “the individuals who constitute a kind of bridge across the wild stream of becoming. These do not, as it were, continue a process but live in timeless simultaneity” (58).
This idea of simultaneity is central to Nietzsche’s essay, which is in large part focused on redressing a lack of cultural integration in Germany. Simultaneity is also a distinctly modernist value. To attain this symphonic unity, Nietzsche looks outside of time, appealing to a Socratic, dialectical approach to truth. At the crux of his essay is the Socratic dictum “know thyself,” which Nietzsche quotes on the final page of his essay (69). As though picking from the Aristotelian unities of time, place, and action, Nietzsche’s conception of the great acts of history has them transcend time, taking place in a quasi-Platonic realm beyond the world.
By Friedrich Nietzsche