54 pages • 1 hour read
Bill BrysonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Bryson places the city of Oxford into a particular category: One must be British to like it. Though he admires its older buildings and grudgingly acknowledges its academic credentials (while skewering the obsolescence of its education), he finds the city irredeemably unattractive otherwise—too much modern interference. He believes that the city has been subject to local apathy and general ineptitude in planning.
He decides to visit Sutton Courtenay, where George Orwell is buried. He reflects upon the many great figures who hail from Britain, whose tombstones express only humility.
Bryson decides to rent a car for his tour of the Cotswolds. Though he is not very comfortable with driving, he knows that a car is the best way to access what he wants to see on this tour. Despite being mystified by the car’s controls, the author makes it to Woodstock, whose preserved homes and lovely landscape he enjoys. He then goes to Bladon, where Winston Churchill is buried in a simply marked grave. He also visits Blenheim Palace, finding its grandeur incommensurate with the modest achievements of the Duke of Marlborough, in sharp contrast to Winston Churchill’s humble memorial.
The car prevents him from fully enjoying his time traveling through the Cotswolds. He stops in Broadway and looks over the Vale of Evesham, once again noting the beauty of the landscape. He also comments that this beauty is slowly being eroded, pointing out, in particular, the loss of hedgerows. While many would argue that these constructions are merely modern accouterments, Bryson knows that some of them date back nearly 1,000 years.
He moves on to Snowshill, then spends the night at Cirencester. He visits the Corinium Museum, known for its collection of Roman art and artifacts, before driving into Winchcombe to see the ruins of a Roman villa. He marvels at the mosaic floor, still largely intact and incredibly well preserved; he feels a connection to the past. The mosaic is more impressive for still being what it was meant to be, a floor (rather than an artwork for display in a museum). The chapter ends with a note that a reader wrote to him, after the British edition of the book was published, to inform him that the mosaic was, in fact, a “Victorian replica” (150).
After returning the car, Bryson heads to Milton Keynes by train (which actually requires travel back to London to catch another train). The town is advertised as one of the post-war planned towns that were supposed to serve as models for the future of Britain. Though he does not dislike the place immediately, he soon recognizes its flaws: It is too organized, too uniform, and too modern.
After this experience, he is unsure of where to go next. The journey has, thus far, taken longer than he expected; he is now halfway through the planned duration of the trip without even having traveled as far as the Midlands, which borders Northern England and Wales. After a walk around Devil’s Dyke, Bryson takes a train to Cambridge.
He finds himself disappointed with the city, even though he knows he should be more charitable. His mood is low, and he accepts the disappointment that will define the day. The pubs are empty; the restaurants barely acceptable; and the hotel television has nothing pleasant on offer.
Bryson profiles what he considers the oddities of the aristocracy. He notes that the complexity of lineage is compounded by the use of “courtesy titles” (162), not to mention the fact that certain members of the nobility are afforded multiple titles. He claims that intermarriage supports the tradition. Most titles are passed on through the male line, which puts the system in danger of extinction. Using his research, he decides to visit the home of the eccentric fifth Duke of Portland.
After an aside criticizing the use of cellphones on trains, the author makes his way toward Worksop, also known as The Dukeries. In Welbeck Abbey, he will find the fifth Duke of Portland’s home. Bryson is drawn to the Duke because of his infamous reclusiveness. He refused to speak or interact with people, including his own servants. After his passing, the Duke’s heirs found the house virtually empty: One toilet and many boxes of wigs were all that it allegedly contained.
As Bryson makes his way there, however, the journey grows strange. When the house is finally in sight, he encounters a sign that bars entry. He presses onward anyway—until he is stopped by an official wearing a Ministry of Defense insignia on his jacket. He is escorted off the property—which the official describes as a “[t]raining center” (170)—as he marvels at the levels of eccentricity that England alone seems capable of producing.
He next visits the Lincoln Cathedral, surprised by the lack of tourists and impressed by the medieval handiwork. He then moves on to Bradford, a place he decides to visit only because the local movie theater is showing This Is Cinerama. He is interested in reviewing the film that he saw once in childhood. It dates from 1956 and was created to combat the growing threat that television represented to the film industry. He is mesmerized and made homesick by the images of Niagara Falls, the Kansas City Airport, and the Grand Canyon, among others, while “God Bless America” plays in the background. He is (mostly) ready to go back to the US.
After a curry dinner in Bradford, the author realizes that he is too close to his own home to travel onward. He spends a few days at home, in domestic happiness. He makes day trips to Saltaire, a factory town from the 19th century, and to Shipley Glen, an amusement park, as well as the surrounding areas. While most of these places are not very old, in the context of British history, they have largely succumbed to changing times, in particular the collapse of the textile industry.
Bryson notes that the North of England is quite different from the South. The ways of speaking and the accents are distinct, and the north has been more directly impacted by economic hardship. The small towns that he and his friend amble through are irrevocably changed, not for the better.
The next day, he agrees to go shopping with his wife in Harrogate. He laments the awfulness of the shopping center and wonders how to honor the heritage of Britain without turning it into an amusement park. Still, Harrogate itself is a nice town, he admits, a spot of prosperity in an otherwise financially depressed region. This gives it some variety and interest, he thinks. As he daydreams, his wife comes around the corner, surprised that he remembered where they had arranged to meet.
Bryson inhabits both the status of an outsider and the familiarity of an insider; thus, he establishes the authority to speak on The Mutual Fascination Between British and American People. From this liminal perspective, he can speak to his nostalgia for both places and position himself as an equal opportunity satirist. Thus, he can begin his chapter on Oxford by suggesting that “[t]here are certain things that you have to be British, or at least older than me, or possibly both, to appreciate” (130). He goes on to list such things as Marmite, cricket, and “really milky tea” (130). This list, of course, also includes the University of Oxford, whose educational system he lampoons as impossibly obsolete. Nevertheless, he also acknowledges that, during the College Bowl academic competition between England and the US, “[t]he British team won so handily that a kind of embarrassed hush fell over the proceedings” (131). Bryson points out that the US economy dwarfs that of the UK, suggesting that the kind of knowledge gleaned at Oxford and tested in the College Bowl may not have much to do with success in the modern world.
This juxtaposition between the two countries also corresponds to the author’s preoccupation with The Tension Between Modernization and Historic Preservation. While America looks toward the future, England must better preserve its precious links to the past. This outlook underpins the author’s critique of Oxford: “It is a beautiful city that has been treated with gross indifference and lamentable incompetence for far too long, and every living person in Oxford should feel a little bit ashamed” (135). The cityscape has been blighted with modern structures amidst its historic buildings, not to mention crisscrossed with roadways that interrupt ancient thoroughfares. Worse, this has all been done under the auspices of what passes for city planning. For Bryson, the historical value of the city must take precedence over modern convenience.
The author also objects to traveling by car as another intervention of modern technology that disrupts the experience of travel: “You are so sealed off from the world in a moving vehicle, and the pace is all wrong” (145). Cars, like contemporary architecture, are anathema to Bryson’s notion of enlightened travel; they keep one closed off to the open air, to the slow and thoughtful perambulations throughout the countryside or market square. Bryson’s praise for the village of Woodstock demonstrates his ideals concerning both travel and English culture: “Its Georgian houses had a confident, almost regal air; its pubs were numerous and snug, its shops interesting and varied, and their frontages uniformly unspoiled” (141). In addition, Woodstock boasts Blenheim Palace and Park, where “a rural arcadia of the sort that seems incomplete without a couple of Gainsborough figures ambling by” comfortably exists next to the town (142). Thus, the author explicitly values the conservation of history and nature; the local and varied over the universal and uniform; and the nostalgic comforts of tradition over the convenience of modernization.
He sees threats to these values everywhere. For example, in contrast to Woodstock, the town of Milton Keynes is a planned community built “during that brief but heady period when social engineering didn’t seem an ominous term” (152). He notes the town’s many flaws: First, “it looked anything but English” (152), and its residential district consists of “a boundless expanse of neat, numbingly identical yellow-brick homes” (153). The central part of the town is dominated by “the lifeless core of office buildings,” while “the shopping center was even worse designed than the town around it” (154). Milton Keynes is not only ugly and drably uniform (as parts of Oxford can be), but also decidedly alien, an American invention dumped on English soil. Modernity is more than a threat to the beauty of English cities; it is a threat to the English way of life itself.
Nevertheless, though Bryson perceives threats to English history and tradition everywhere, he also witnesses glimpses of its resilience. When visiting Lincoln Cathedral, the author goes so far as to praise modernization for providing a backdrop against which medieval achievements stand out all the more sharply: “Still, it must be said that the modern intrusions do help to underline how extravagantly deployed were the skills of medieval stonemasons, glaziers, and wood-carvers” (172). The crude efficiency of modernity cannot compete with the craftsmanship of history. Bryson’s anxiety over the stewardship of such places is inextricably linked to his admiration of this culture and its particular history.
He also celebrates the fact that such a small island has produced so many great figures: “Call me a perennial Iowa farmboy, but I never fail to be impressed by how densely packed with achievement is this little island” (137). Thus, he visits the gravesites of the writer George Orwell and the former Prime Minister Winston Churchill—the two forever linked in Orwell’s own writing via 1984—noting that the memorials are succinct and humble. These are the cultural exports of this impressive island, according to Bryson, not just the men and their work but also that sensibility. It would not do to boast; rather, humility itself is a cultural product of Bryson’s adoptive home, one that he admires as antithetical to American boastfulness.
By Bill Bryson