logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Jon Krakauer

Missoula: Rape and the Justice System in a College Town

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 6Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 6: “Aftershocks”

Part 6, Chapter 29 Summary

Chapter 29 focuses on the legal and social aftermath following the acquittal of Jordan Johnson. The chapter recounts how athletes, particularly football players, are often shielded from accountability for their actions, and it describes the role that community and institutional support plays in enabling their behavior. When Pat Williams, a Montana Regent, criticizes the university’s recruitment of athletes with problematic behavior, it leads to controversy and public backlash.

Meanwhile, Donaldson attempts to reduce his sentence for rape despite having agreed not to appeal as part of his plea deal. The emotional testimonies of Huguet and Hillary McLaughlin underscore the trauma they endured and the injustice of Donaldson seeking leniency.

Part 6, Chapter 30 Summary

The Missoula Police Department and the University of Montana agree to cooperate with the DOJ’s investigation into the handling of sexual assault cases in Missoula and implement recommended changes. However, Van Valkenburg refuses to comply, asserting that the DOJ has no authority over his office. Despite efforts by the DOJ to reach an agreement, Van Valkenburg remains defiant, leading to a lawsuit against the federal government. The DOJ responds by releasing a scathing report detailing the failures of Van Valkenburg’s office in addressing sexual assault cases, including accusations of indifference and mistreatment of survivors. The conflict further exposes deep divisions within the Missoula community, with some supporting Van Valkenburg’s stance as a defense of local autonomy, while others, including local leaders, see the DOJ’s involvement as necessary for improving the safety and treatment of sexual assault survivors.

Part 6, Chapter 31 Summary

Van Valkenburg’s refusal to cooperate with the Department of Justice (DOJ) during their investigation into the Missoula County Attorney’s Office (MCAO) causes political fallout and controversy. There is an upcoming election for Missoula county attorney, and Kirsten Pabst, a former deputy attorney under Van Valkenburg, emerges as a key candidate. Pabst, who gained notoriety for defending Jordan Johnson, runs on a platform of reform and compassion despite being implicated in many of the issues the DOJ criticized. Her main opponent, Josh Van de Wetering, promises to prioritize sexual assault cases and cooperation with the DOJ. The election becomes heated, with Pabst’s campaign, backed by powerful supporters, attacking Van de Wetering aggressively. Ultimately, Pabst wins the election, though her campaign is later scrutinized for legal violations. Despite this, the election results stand, and Van Valkenburg eventually drops his lawsuit against the DOJ, agreeing to comply with its directives, although he continues to express his dissatisfaction with the federal government’s involvement.

Part 6, Chapter 32 Summary

Chapter 32 examines the broader implications of the Missoula rape scandal and the subsequent investigations. Krakauer highlights the systemic failures across the University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, and the Missoula County Attorney’s Office that contributed to the mishandling of sexual assault cases. While the university and police department made significant strides in addressing these issues, the Missoula County Attorney’s Office, under Van Valkenburg and Pabst, remained resistant to change, perpetuating a culture of inadequate prosecution. The chapter also details the psychological impact of sexual assault on survivors, emphasizing the deep and lasting trauma that often accompanies such experiences. Krakauer concludes by advocating for reforms in how sexual assault cases are handled both in the criminal justice system and on college campuses, stressing the importance of giving survivors a voice and the need for society to confront the pervasive issue of sexual violence.

Part 6 Analysis

In Part 6, Chapters 29 through 32 of Missoula, Jon Krakauer continues to expose the institutional failures that have allowed perpetrators of sexual assault to evade accountability. Although he continues to consider individual cases, the emphasis is on the systemic critique of the University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, the Missoula County Attorney’s Office, and the nationwide culture they represent—one that downplays or ignores sexual violence. In this context, Krakauer’s continued alternation between individual testimonies and a critical analysis of the systemic issues revealed through legal documents and investigations highlights how individual cases reflect larger societal issues. For example, the analysis of Johnson’s trial and its aftermath demonstrates the interconnectedness of individual experiences and institutional responsibility.

The Role of Institutions in Perpetuating or Combating Rape Culture is thus a central theme in this section, as Krakauer scrutinizes how the University of Montana, in particular, allowed its adoration of the Griz football team to overshadow its responsibility to protect students from harm. As Krakauer notes, “The adoration of the Griz football team created a pernicious atmosphere of entitlement” (367). This quote encapsulates how the university’s prioritization of its football program fostered a sense of immunity among athletes, creating an environment where sexual violence could thrive without consequences. The word “pernicious” emphasizes the insidious nature of this entitlement, suggesting that it corrupted the institution’s ability to serve as a fair and protective body for all its students. By focusing on how this culture allowed players to escape scrutiny, Krakauer critiques the broader cultural reverence for athletics that often places athletes above the law, thereby perpetuating rape culture within institutions.

Krakauer draws on legal scholars and governmental reports to build his credibility and strengthen his critique of the legal system, which ties into the theme of The Dynamics of Sexual Assault Cases in the Legal System. In particular, Krakauer references the DOJ findings to underscore the systemic issues in the Missoula County Attorney’s Office and the police department’s mishandling of cases. Krakauer’s reliance on sources like the DOJ report anticipates criticism that accounts of institutional failures are anecdotal; rather, individual accounts are backed by formal investigations and expert analysis.

Krakauer also continues to underscore the psychological impact of rape, which institutional failures often exacerbate, as part of his exploration of Victim Advocacy and the Challenges Faced by Survivors. The quote, “The repercussions of severe emotional trauma, whether from war or rape, are typically felt for decades” (380), illustrates the long-lasting impact of sexual assault, which Krakauer compares to the trauma of war. By invoking a widely understood form of trauma—post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from war—Krakauer validates the severity of the psychological effects of rape and criticizes the justice system’s failure to address these impacts with the same seriousness. As veterans experiencing PTSD have historically tended to be men whereas rape survivors experiencing PTSD tend to be women, there is also an implicit critique of the broader gendered differences in society’s approach to trauma.

Language remains key to Krakauer’s narrative. His sharp, direct tone reflects the urgency of the issue, particularly when discussing the systemic barriers that survivors face in seeking justice. Krakauer’s critique of the Missoula County Attorney’s Office, for example, is not merely an indictment of one individual but of a culture that allowed the MCAO to consistently under-prosecute sexual assault cases. The direct diction and syntax of the quote, “Rapists rely on the silence of their victims to elude accountability” (380), underscores Krakauer’s focus on giving survivors a voice. By emphasizing the connection between silence and impunity, Krakauer highlights how the justice system’s failure to support survivors often results in their voices being silenced, either through disbelief, intimidation, or institutional neglect.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text