40 pages • 1 hour read
Athol FugardA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Sam is a Black man in his mid-forties who works as a waiter at the St. George’s Park Tea Room. He is intelligent, and of all the characters in the play, he has the best understanding of how Shame and Systems of Power work in their lives. He demonstrates this understanding when he tells Willie that Hilda does not want to dance with him anymore, because Willie beats her when she gets the steps wrong. He understands how misogyny and gendered violence impact Hilda and is eventually, by the end of the play, able to show Willie that a better way is possible. Sam is also very aware of the systems of power that oppress him and Willie: apartheid and racial inequality. He finds these systems extremely frustrating, but he cannot openly voice his frustrations to Hally, out of fear that Hally might retaliate and threaten his job. When Hally points out, abstractly, that the world is unfair, Sam replies that it is simply the way things are. This assertion has a ring of irony to it when considering the Racial Dynamics in South Africa. Injustices do not simply occur naturally; they are constructed and enforced by systems of power for specific purposes. In the case of apartheid South Africa, white supremacy upheld racial injustice. Sam is aware of this dynamic, but he is unable to explain it clearly to Hally because of his precarious position in a racist society.
Although Sam cannot fully express his opinions, he does demonstrate his unwillingness to buy into the apartheid system by using Hally’s nickname. He wants to have a relationship with Hally that is equal and built on mutual respect, rather than one that positions him as inferior. Despite their racial differences, Sam sees himself as a role model for Hally, whose own father is cruel and unable to help Hally become a thoughtful and compassionate adult. In many ways, Sam has been a surrogate father and shared experiences with him (such as the kite flying and games of checkers) that nurtured their bond and modeled for Hally a better way of being a man than Hally’s father presents. Sam walks a fine line between wanting to protect Hally and being frustrated when Hally cannot see, or is unwilling to engage with, the injustice of the world around him. At various points throughout the play, it is evident that Sam feels that he has failed to instill any kind of racial consciousness in Hally. When Hally starts to demonstrate overt racism when they argue about his father, Sam warns him that if he continues down this road, he will only have himself to be ashamed of. Even though Hally’s racism obviously hurts Sam deeply, if Sam has any hope of getting him to listen, he must center Hally and argue that his racism will ultimately hurt Hally the most. He cannot appeal to Hally based on his own right to dignity and fair treatment because Hally has already shown that he will cling to privilege rather than confront his flaws.
Sam is trapped in a very difficult place. By the end of the play, he confronts Hally directly with the realities of apartheid and Hally’s own complicity in the system by revealing to him the truth about the “Whites Only” bench from the kite memory. He challenges Hally to leave behind his white supremacy and to fight the systems of power that keep white people privileged but isolated and separate from the rest of the country. Through Sam, Athol Fugard demonstrates that the “apartness” of apartheid keeps everyone in a state of isolation. While white people benefited enormously from the white supremacist system, Sam argues that the shame of being complicit in such a system ought to be intolerable. He wants Hally to grow up into a man who is proud of himself rather than ashamed. To Sam, that pride comes from being able to stand up to injustices and challenge the apartheid system.
Willie is the other employee at Hally’s mother’s tea room. He is a character foil for Sam: While Sam is more obviously unhappy with the apartheid system, Willie has put his head down and opted to be unquestioningly respectful of Hally. He calls Hally either “Master Harold” or “Master Hally” and does not challenge Hally’s authority the way Sam does. Willie represents the impossible situation that Black South Africans found themselves in under apartheid. Even though Willie is deferential, Hally still punishes him with violence when he feels that Willie has crossed a line. Buying into the racist power structures out of fear of retaliation does not put Willie, or men like him, in a place of safety, because there is no place of safety for Black people under racist, white supremacist systems. The only way to enact positive change is to fight back, but fighting back comes with its own dangers.
Willie subconsciously demonstrates the refusal to give up and accept an unjust reality. When he despairs that Hilda will not be his partner in the dance competition, Sam suggests that it is not too late for Willie to drop out of the competition. Willie is horrified by this suggestion and refuses, saying that he has worked too hard for too long to give up. The dance competition is a metaphor for hope for a better world, so Willie’s refusal to drop out indicates that he still believes that better things are possible. Though the competition is bringing him anguish—Hilda does not want to practice with him anymore, because he has treated her so poorly—he nevertheless wants to continue. Giving up is unthinkable for Willie because, on a metanarrative level, it would mean giving up on the possibility of a better future.
Like the other characters in this play, Willie is complicated. He is a sympathetic character, portrayed as kind and deferential to Hally and as a victim of terribly unjust racism. On the other hand, he also admits beating Hilda whenever she makes a mistake at their rehearsals for the dance competition. Willie is both victim of and perpetuator of Shame and Systems of Power, just as Hally is. It is only through Sam that Willie can understand that unless he is kinder to Hilda and stops beating her, she will not take part in the dance competition with him. More broadly speaking, this is a call to action for those engaging in liberation struggles: Unless everyone within a liberation movement is treated as an equal in the fight, building a better future will be impossible. This is particularly relevant to the anti-apartheid struggle, the context in which this play was written. Willie demonstrates the need within the anti-apartheid movement to fight for the freedom of all the people who were classified as inferior. At the end of the play, when Willie agrees to apologize to Hilda so that they can continue to practice for the dance competition, he is learning to change entrenched behavior that oppresses women. Though one of the “boys” of the play’s title, Willie is more capable of learning than Hally is. The idea that the grown men in the play are infantilized yet wiser and kinder than their young white “master” is at the heart of “Master Harold”…and the boys.
Hally is the white 17-year-old son of the owner of the St. George’s Park Tea Room. He is a complicated character with many contradictions. Hally is largely convinced of his own superiority over Sam and Willie. He sees himself as intellectually superior because he is white, and he weaponizes his education to reinforce his sense of superiority. Hally does not see the real injustices of the world around him. While he is pessimistic and expresses “despair for this world” (14), he never voices specifically what about the world he finds unjust. Even though he lives in apartheid-era South Africa, one of the most notoriously unequal, racist societies in recent history, he responds to Sam’s suggestion that South Africa is unjust by arguing that Sam has “never been a slave” (18). Hally has no structural understanding of systems of oppression; the absence of slavery, to him, means the absence of racism. Hally ignores the never-ending oppression that Black people faced during the apartheid era when they were not allowed to own property, live in cities, marry outside of their race, or access a fair and equal justice system. In addition to the outright violence Black South Africans faced at the hands of white employers and police, Hally ignores the day-to-day challenges facing Black citizens in his country. He has never questioned whether his treatment of Sam and Willie upholds systems of injustice.
Over the course of the play, Hally is on an Education and Coming of Age journey where he has two choices. He can either become a man like his father, who is cruel, racist, and actively participates in unjust systems of oppression, or he can listen to Sam, open his eyes, and become someone who challenges and fights back against apartheid. Sam challenges Hally to walk away from the bench, meaning that he has the choice to refuse to uphold white supremacy and confront his own racial biases. Sam wants Hally to grow up into someone he is proud of, but Hally’s major roadblock in becoming this person is his self-centeredness. He can only understand injustices that apply specifically to him and is more upset by the idea of his father coming home and disturbing his peace than he is by the reality of apartheid. His sense of injustice is therefore one that is rooted in selfishness and unexamined bias. Instead of developing genuine solidarity with other people who experience injustice, like Sam and Willie, he believes that no one can understand him or what he is going through and isolates himself from those who show him kindness and care.
When Sam asks that Hally not disrespect him by forcing him to call him “Master Harold,” Hally responds by making a deeply racist joke to reassert his power over Sam. He is not yet ready to take the necessary steps to overcome his racist education and treat Sam and Willie as his equals. The ending of the play leaves him in an ambiguous position and does not clarify if Hally will rise to Sam’s challenge to “stand up and walk away from [the bench]” (60). Here, Hally represents the crossroads that South Africa was at in the 1980s, when Fugard wrote the play. All white South Africans faced a mounting decision: to continue to uphold the apartheid system, or to refuse to accept white supremacy and push for a more just system of government. Sam’s challenge to Hally doubles as Fugard’s challenge to his fellow white South Africans. When the play was published in the 1980s, Fugard did not know what the future would hold for South Africa. Hally’s choice is not revealed because, at the time, Fugard could not know how his country would change. The audience is left hoping that Hally will make the right choice, which also forces them to confront their own complicity in racist systems and question the choices they make.
By Athol Fugard