logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Nancy Horan

Loving Frank

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2007

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Love as an Expression of Honesty

While early-20th-century American society views Mamah Bouton Borthwick’s relationship with famous architect Frank Lloyd Wright as scandalous, the two lovers see themselves as expressing their true selves. For Mamah and Frank, their relationship offers a means of liberation from society’s expectations, and each uses it to explore parts of themselves through art. Marrying into the upper-middle class, Mamah’s relationship with Edwin “Ed” Cheney brings her comfort but does not spark intellectual connection—not the way her conversations with Frank do. At the beginning of Loving Frank, she is involved in the Woman Movement in Oak Park, Illinois, but it isn’t until she meets Frank that she feels like she is truly living her life and begins to contribute to the Woman Movement on a national level.

Mamah feels freed by her relationship with Frank, and “[s]uch feeling liberates and deepens the personality, inspires us to noble needs and works of genius” (132). This is a sentiment echoed later in the novel when she hears philosopher Ellen Key speak for the first time. Ellen emphasizes “the noblest type of love,” one in which “both lovers yearn to become entirely one being, to free each other and to develop each other to the greatest perfection” (132). Frank finds this love in Mamah, often noting that she is his muse and serves as his inspiration. In fact, his approach to architecture changes after her death, ending his “Prairie style.” On the other hand, Mamah both recognizes Frank’s commitment to his art and feels frustrated with his inability to compromise (especially to the point of financial strain); however, she respects how his art seeks to compromise with nature. Frank approaches love as he does his work, seeing the two as intertwined. Mamah, likewise, feels encouraged and supported by Frank in her career as a translator—which is how she contributes to the Woman Movement.

However, Mamah struggles with the relationship between honesty and its effects on her family. The nature of an affair is in itself dishonest, even if Mamah does reveal the truth to Ed of her own volition. She justifies the affair by thinking that “[t]o live dishonestly seems[] a cowardly way to use up one’s time […] To embrace Frank, to accept the gift, seem[s] to be an affirmation of life” (139). She views living with Frank as a better example for her children than staying in an unhappy marriage with Ed. A central question in the novel is whether or not Mamah’s actions are worth their consequences, and different characters offer different opinions on this—with even Mamah’s sister, Lizzie, and philosopher-turned-friend Ellen disapproving of her. After Mamah’s death, Frank attempts to dispel some of their controversy in his editorial letter in the Weekly Home News, writing, “The ‘freedom’ in which we joined was infinitely more difficult than any conformity with customs could have been” (352). He believes many of their critics failed to see the difficulty in living honestly, seeing their affair as an easy, sinful act when they could have worked harder in their marriages.

Individuality and the Creation of Art

Mamah introduces Frank’s work as “either an outrageous aberration or a stroke of brilliance,” depending on who is looking at it (4). Frank’s individuality drives his work, and throughout the novel, his work gains more acceptance; regardless of acceptance or fame, Frank and Mamah both value the consistency of one’s work with one’s beliefs. They see their work as contributing to the world and constantly interrogate what it means to be so involved in these processes, not just as producers of goods but evaluators of these goods—buildings and translations—as potential reflections of society.

Frank’s gift as an architect comes from his individuality. Mamah immediately notices this, thinking that “[a]nyone as attuned as Frank [is] to nature’s order, anyone raised to reason outside the mainstream, [is] not going to be penned in very well by society’s rules” (35). She also finds this quality attractive because it reminds her of her father, someone she loved. She later adds that if Frank had been classically trained as an architect, it is unlikely that he would have created what he did. Mamah applauds his courage and confidence, and they inspire her to find the same passion for herself. In her life with Ed, she does not see herself as an individual or intellectual; as a wife and mother, she is always in association with either Ed or her children. She tells her friend Mattie, “I would love to have some art of my own, something that sails me away” (62), illustrating how she sees translation as something that is hers, even if she is working with someone else’s words. Translation feels like something that is hers and hers alone, which is why the controversy over who has the rights to translate Ellen Key’s work in the United States hurts—because it turns out that Ellen lied to her.

Overall, Mamah succeeds in her independence as a translator and does not need Frank to continue to inspire her to follow this dream, though she collaborates with and returns to him as a reminder of her contribution to society. She frequently uses their conversations to process her agreements and disagreements with Ellen’s work, especially when she translates Ellen’s essay about motherhood (specifically, it being more important than suffrage and equal pay) and worries about its potential influence. While she uses Frank as a sounding board, Frank claims to need her as his inspiration and is more productive when she is near—showing the difference in their approaches to work. Mamah aspires to help him understand that what he has done is enough, “that there was no need to exaggerate anything. That he was extraordinary already” (228). This struggle causes tension in their relationship, but they ultimately find peace at Taliesin before Mamah’s death.

Society’s Treatment of Women and Mothers

Mamah contends with many of the constraints placed upon women in the early 20th century, and her experience with the press is different than that of Frank when it comes to society’s expectations. Much of the criticism is specific to Mamah as a woman and mother, and it illustrates how women in the 20th century were expected to act a certain way, lest they be ostracized for their actions. Even before living with Frank, Mamah’s involvement with the Woman Movement helps her see the gendered way women are treated, even by fellow women. There is a proper way to act, even when rebelling against patriarchal structures. Anna, Frank’s mother, embodies this journey, making a name for herself within the movement as a cofounder of the Nineteenth Century Woman’s Club. She is later reticent to embrace Mamah when Frank brings her home, despite sharing social circles in Oak Park. Mamah is expected to follow specific rules once she marries Ed, which emphasize loyalty to him and his children; thus, with Frank, she is judged by specific family members such as Anna as well as the public.

Mamah’s affair with Frank renders her anonymous by necessity. Her name becomes recognizable due to the press, especially before she and Ed divorce and she still shares his surname. As a result, Frank refrains from introducing her by name at Taliesin, not wanting to draw attention to her as his mistress. This symbolizes how Mamah’s name, her identity, has been lost to criticism regarding her position as a wife and mother. Frank builds on this point in his letter to the Weekly Home News, in which he writes, “A wife still is ‘property.’ […] birds of prey were loosed upon her in death as well as in life…But this noble woman had a soul that belonged to her alone—that valued womanhood above wifehood or motherhood (352). Even in death, Mamah is reduced to her controversy, and Frank wishes to retrieve her selfhood.

As a philosopher and Mamah’s friend, Ellen Key walks a thin line in her views of how women should act—and her voice is constantly in Mamah’s ear. She tells Mamah that women “are stuck being the keepers of memories and traditions” (150). They are expected to stay static and put their families (especially their husbands and children) above all else. However, Ellen also views motherhood as central, even more than suffrage or equal rights—showing how even those rebelling against patriarchal structures can adhere to gender roles (albeit with varying degrees of nuance). Ultimately, Mamah comes to terms with her choices as both a wife and mother and attempts to find a balance that satisfies her. While others criticize her ruthlessly, her life tells the story of a flawed woman who wanted to be happy in love and in work and who still cared for her children.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text