26 pages • 52 minutes read
Jun’Ichirō Tanizaki, Transl. Thomas J. Harper, Transl. Edward G. SeidenstickerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Tanizaki argues that Asian cultures are more satisfied with their surroundings and find great beauty in them, while Western cultures are always looking to change their surroundings to create beauty from something new. Do you agree with this claim? Explain why or why not, and support your argument with examples.
Tanizaki writes from his own perspective and often includes personal anecdotes and opinions when crafting his arguments. While some may argue that this subjective viewpoint makes the work more effective, others may feel that the essay would be improved by an increased use of objective reasoning. In your opinion, does his use of point of view strengthen or weaken his claims? Explain why.
Tanizaki’s essay contrasts Western and Asian architectural forms, with examples like glass windows versus shoji and the high roofs of Gothic cathedrals versus the low roofs of Japanese temples. Extend this argument further by contrasting other architectural forms that were not analyzed in his essay. Alternatively, you may use examples that help complicate or reject Tanizaki’s claims.
Tanizaki briefly contrasts Western and Japanese theater before moving into his analysis of Noh and Kabuki theater. Provide a similar contrastive analysis of Western theater forms or types of films by thinking about how they use elements such as light, darkness, color, and costume and how they connect to the social realities of everyday citizens.
At the end of this essay, Tanizaki argues that the beauty of darkness should be preserved in literature, rather than in architecture. Why does he think literature is a more suitable forum for this pursuit, and do you agree with this? Why or why not?
Tanizaki uses the toilet as an example of an object with aesthetics that produce a spiritual effect in Japanese society. Can you think of another example of an everyday object that has surprising social or spiritual meanings? Describe it using a style of imagery like Tanizaki’s.
Tanizaki argues that “beauty […] must grow from the realities of life.” Do you agree with this statement, or do you find that this is a limiting perspective on beauty? Explain why, using examples from different sources (architecture, artworks, natural landmarks, etc.).
One of Tanizaki’s arguments in this essay is that each nation should produce its own tools and technology to fit its specific needs and national characteristics. Do you agree with this statement, and is this feasible? Explain why or why not, and support your argument with examples.
While this essay provides a significant amount of contrast between the West and Japan, the author focuses on the latter more than the former. Expand his analysis of the West’s desire for light with added contemporary or historical examples. Has this desire increased or decreased since the 1930s?
In the decades following the publication of this essay, the discourse of postcolonial theory emerged. This perspective is critical of Western global expansion and its many negative social and political effects. One of the key texts from this theory is Edward Said’s Orientalism. How does Tanizaki’s essay fit within the context of postcolonial theory? Can you use this theory to change any of his claims or extend his arguments further?