71 pages • 2 hours read
Daniel ImmerwahrA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The Thirteen Colonies declared their independence from Britain in 1776, becoming the United States. However, some colonists such as the hunter Daniel Boone, “asserted an independence of a different sort” (25) by heading past the boundaries and going west from North Carolina with up to 30 followers. They stopped in Kentucky—inhabited by the Shawnee—and called their settlement “Boonesborough.” The location “on the far side of the Appalachians” was significant—a natural barrier “in law and practice” to British North America (25). Boone “had opened a channel through which hundreds of thousands of whites would soon pour” (25) along with enslaved Black people. While European Enlightenment thinkers considered him a man returning to a more natural way of life, he was not celebrated domestically at that time.
The settlement encroached on the lands of the Indigenous people, who sometimes fought back. At the same time, Boone was adopted into a Shawnee family after being captured by them. These complexities “put Washington in favor of enforcing a British-style settlement boundary” (27). The Founding Fathers started using the term “territory” in the context of the mainland frontier expansion. Congress had “the power to advance or impede territories” (29), as some became states but others, like West Dakota, did not (29). At first, an appointed governor along with three judges ruled territories. The 1803 annexation of the enormous Louisiana Territory, purchased from France, posed several issues for the US government. Thomas Jefferson believed that the residents of Louisiana—Catholics, Anglo settlers, Indigenous people, and free Black people—were “incapable of self-government” (30). Voting for Louisianans would be a “dangerous experiment” (30) according to the appointed governor Arthur St. Clair.
Another significant factor in the development of the United States was sixteenfold population growth between 1790 and 1890. This growth was concentrated among those already residing in the US; immigration accounted for only a third of the increase in the 19th century. Illegal squatters were allowed to purchase the land they occupied. The US “started out resembling the British Empire” in North America but turned into “a violently expansive empire of settlers, feeding on land and displacing everything in its path” (35).
The rapid growth of the white settler population is connected to “the extraordinary de-population of the land’s indigenous inhabitants” (36). The arrival of the Europeans provoked a “profound demographic crisis,” which included diseases like smallpox and measles, war, and dislocation. By the early 19th century, historians believe the Indigenous population faced a 90% decline.
The way the Indigenous people met the Europeans differed. Some, like the Cherokee, were perceived as “the whiteman in manners, morals and religion” (37), leading to treaties. However, the ongoing settler expansion made the existing agreements difficult to maintain. “Squatter onslaught” in places like Georgia overrode the Supreme Court declaring Georgia’s attempts to gain Cherokee land illegal. Nonetheless, Georgia split the land in Cherokee Nation and distributed it to white settlers. Then came the Trail of Tears, which forcefully removed the Cherokees from their land and moved them to Oklahoma, with thousands dying from the elements, hunger, and disease along the way (38).
Initially, President Andrew Jackson envisioned the West as “something resembling an Indian colony” (38), separated from white settlements. His proposed act was to “formally divide the country into unequal parts, a settler part and an Indian part” (39). Some, like John Quincy Adams, considered this proposal one of an empire, not a republic, while others worried about the racial implications, like having “a full-blood savage” (39) in government. The proposal for Western Territory was rejected by Congress but revealed a tendency towards border policing. Then, Indian Country lost Nebraska and Kansas as the “[e]ager white settlers streamed in” (41). The Indigenous people were forced to move until “Indian Country” “had been reduced to its southern tip, present-day Oklahoma” (42). As time went on, “the government acquiesced to the settlers’ demands, squeezing Indigenous American land claims over the territory’s eastern side via allotment and distributing the western side to whites” (43). In 1907, Oklahoma became a state, making “[t]he final extirpation of Indian Country” (44) an event of profound significance for the Indigenous population of the United States.
Historically, borders changed often. It is after World War II that a certain level of geopolitical stability made “the shapes of countries seem inevitable” (46). Such stability was not the case in the 19th-century United States, as the country started annexing multiple small islands both in the Pacific and in the Caribbean in 1857, in addition to its westward expansion. The islands were uninhabited and held no strategic value at that time, but did have guano—the excrement of seabirds, like cormorants and pelicans.
Guano was important to 19th-century agriculture because of America’s growing population. Its nitrogen-rich nature and affordability made guano popular among farmers as a fertilizer. Guano collecting was “the single worst job you could have in the nineteenth century” (53). Workers lived in crowded conditions and ended up with respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses. Approximately 68 guano ships mutinied between 1847 and 1874 due to poor working conditions or even being kidnapped to work in the industry.
In one case, Navassa Phosphate Company operating on Navassa, an island next to Haiti, relied on African American labor. When violence erupted between white officers out of a dispute between a worker and an overseer, five white officers died. The alleged culprits were brought back to Baltimore, where the community raised funds for a good defense team. The United States lacked jurisdiction to convict the rioters because “Navassa was foreign soil” (54) according to the defense. Questions of corporate interests on American territory arose (55). The question made it all the way to the Supreme Court. The rioters, who received death sentences, had their sentences commuted by President Benjamin Harrison because it was “inexcusable that American laborers should be left without access to any Government officer or tribunal for their protection” (56).
Overall, the guano era “left three legacies, all of which would shape the fate of the Greater United States” (56). First, the Guano Islands Act and the Supreme Court ruling that the US law applied to Navassa meant that “the borders of the United States needn’t be confined to the continent” (56). Second, the islands became strategically important for the “pointillist empire” as airfields after World War II (56). Third, the immediate impact was agricultural, as guano was one of the fertilizers that kept agriculture sustainable until the invention of fertilizer manufacturing by Fritz Haber. The Haber-Bosch process meant that ammonia synthesis would yield infinite amounts of fertilizer. Haber went on to work in the weapons industry and invented poison gas for German use in World War I. After the war, Haber invented Zyklon A, which was then modified into Zyklon B in the Holocaust. Haber was married to Clara Haber (née Immerwahr), the first female scientist in Germany with a chemistry doctorate. Her cousin, Max, was the author’s great-grandfather.
Most high-level politicians did not participate in the settlement boom, but Teddy Roosevelt was an exception. Roosevelt founded a ranch in Dakota Territory in 1883, leaving the east coast (59). He lived in a log cabin, hunted, and wrote books like The Wilderness Hunter (1893). Yet, “there was something buffoonish about Thee’s mountain-man routine—an overgrown boy playing cowboys and Indians” (60).
Historian Frederick Jackson Turner and Roosevelt subscribed to the “frontier thesis,” which posited the frontier as “the great regenerating force in US life—the source of democracy, individualism, practicality, and freedom” (62). They feared that, as the frontier was conquered and disappeared, the character of American life would change too. At the same time, historian Alfred Thayer Mahan published The Influence of Sea Power upon History (1890), emphasizing strategic sea exploration linked to maritime commerce and overseas naval bases. Mahan had a significant impact on Roosevelt’s thinking.
In the Spanish-American War (1898), Roosevelt “envisioned an all-out attack on the Spanish Empire” (66). In May 1898, Commodore George Dewey either captured or sank every Spanish ship in the Battle of Manila Bay. Roosevelt commanded one of the three volunteer cavalry regiments that were approved by Congress. The Battle for the San Juan Heights in Cuba proved to be important for Roosevelt and his Rough Riders. After this battle, the Americans defeated the Spanish troops in Cuba as well as Puerto Rico. One of the principal reasons for American victory is the fact that Spain had been dealing with colonial unrest that weakened it substantially, while the US was a latecomer “supplying the burst of force at the end of a long, bloody conflict that had already nearly destroyed the Spanish Empire” (70). The surrender agreements, however, were between the US and Spain, rather than, for instance, Cuba and Spain: “The war may have begun as an empire-wide revolt by Spain’s colonial subjects, but it ended as the ‘Spanish-American War’” (72). The US occupied Cuba as a result.
Immerwahr considers the 19th-century American westward expansion the first of the three stages of the US imperial project. The project features a single trajectory and set of fundamentals despite certain differences. This first stage involved white colonial settlers—like Daniel Boone—displacing the Indigenous population. Boone’s actual story is more complex because he both fought the Indigenous Americans and was adopted into a Shawnee family. However, as an early American hero for the settlers, he was reduced to a stereotype featuring a set of expected qualities such as bravery, living off the land, and rugged individualism. In popular culture, such works as the famous 1940s Oklahoma! Musical became a “jubilant refrain of the white settler” (45).
The frequent use of the term “territory” is also linked to the paradox of the American mindset. Americans perceived themselves as a republic, something explicitly different from European colonialism and entanglements. Yet in practice, the formative years of the young American republic involved the displacement of the continent’s Indigenous people. The settler expansion also revealed the initially ambivalent attitude of the different branches of state and federal government and the courts. In some cases, the Supreme Court issued rulings to prevent such expansion, but did not enforce it. The white squatters overrode such decisions with their mere presence. The population growth made the new mainland territories de facto part of the US before they were incorporated de jure. The frontier drive highlighted the question of borders, stressing the fact that the “government’s true focus was policing the borders: keeping Indians in and whites out” (40). This question was one of the consistent aspects of the US Empire following the annexation of the former Spanish colonies. By looking at these questions from the standpoint of the Greater United States, many events look different. For instance, the Spanish-American War becomes the “Spanish-Cuban-Puerto Rican-Philippine-American War” (70). Likewise, the Navassa controversy over an uninhabited guano island between the US and Haiti became “the foundation for the United States’ entire overseas empire” (56). The legal and strategic aspects of this controversy apply to the US empire at large.
The border question was underpinned by the American use of the euphemism “territory” instead of “colony.” In practice, territories were subject to some American laws but not others, which created legal loopholes and violated the rights of the people living there. Which territories became full members of the union were ultimately in the hands of the government, and these decisions sometimes seemed arbitrary. In many cases, they were underpinned by the question of race, such as in Hawaii, which ultimately gained statehood in 1959, and the Philippines, which gained independence in 1946. American statesmen typically believed that those of non-European descent were incapable of governing themselves. In the best-case scenario, they were perceived as children akin to the Enlightenment-era’s “noble savage”—Rudyard Kipling’s “white man’s burden” by another name. The theme Race, Identity, and the American Empire will explore this question throughout the book.
American Literature
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Colonialism Unit
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Power
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection