logo

64 pages 2 hours read

Emily McIntire

Hooked: A Dark, Contemporary Romance

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Revenge as a Cycle

The plot of Hooked relies on a tangled web of revenge motives, and most of the characters seem to act on plans to enact vengeance on one or more characters. James, or Hook, wants to get revenge on Peter Michaels, but this desire for revenge extends at times to Wendy, as well. Prior to the events of the narrative, James wanted revenge on Croc, his uncle, and as Hooked concludes, this desire for revenge extends to Smee, Moira, and Starkey, leaving James as the most revenge-motivated character in the novel. However, these individual motivations are parallel to the characters targeted by James. Smee is acting out of revenge, as well, since he saw James kill Croc, Smee’s father, and he resents that James got to spend time with Croc at all. James wants revenge on Peter for killing his family, but Peter committed that act out of revenge for Andrew Barrie, James’s father, who slept with Peter’s wife, resulting in Jonathan’s birth. In each situation, the current revenge motive is rooted in a prior act of vengeance, resulting in a cycle of motivations to violence.

The myriad revenge plots of Hooked all rely on the blind spots in each character’s perception of their own narrative. Peter does not realize that Andrew Barrie’s son survived the plane crash, and James admits that the night he killed his uncle, “it’s not beyond the realm of possibility that someone was looking in” (280). It is because someone might always be looking in on any given part of the story that characters have such blind spots. For each person, they are the focus of any given event, and so they are not aware that events like the plane crash or Croc’s death can serve as the origin point for a different character’s desire for revenge. Even as the characters knowingly lash out at one another, there is an element of surprise in any retaliatory acts, such as Peter burning down the Jolly Roger but then expressing anger that James would retaliate by burning down Peter’s planes. The retaliation seems obvious from a third-person perspective, compiling the details about each character as a reader, for example, but each individual character is locked in a one-sided perception that does not allow for interference. Unfortunately, this pattern sets up an unending repetition of retaliation and revenge, leading from Andrew’s death to Ru’s death, Wendy’s kidnapping to the destruction of the Jolly Roger, and the destruction of Peter’s planes to Smee’s appearance in the end.

At the novel’s close, all characters in opposition to the protagonists are dead, and thus none are left to continue the theme of Revenge as a Cycle. The narrative arc of Wendy’s coming into possession of her selfhood and James coming to terms with his compassion, both realizing that they are worthy of stability and affection, brings an end to the cycle and allows characters in harmony with them to grow beyond the cycle.

The Problematic Portrayal of Violence as a Virtue in Dark Romance

As a dark romance novel, Hooked displays many aspects of eroticism that readers may consider to be “deviant” or “kinky,” and in this context, violent behavior is often portrayed in a sensationalized—and often idealized—light. While the proponents of the genre find these elements to be an integral part of the plot structure, it is also important to note that the glorification of violence and physical abuse in an intimate setting—whether consensual or not—can often be a triggering or disturbing concept for some readers to digest. Ultimately, darker depictions of both sexuality and physical intimacy play multiple roles in developing James and Wendy as nuanced characters within the narrative, for McIntire uses the couple’s respective traumas and internal psychological obstacles as methods with which to add a marked level of titillation to both their sexual encounters and their more normalized day-to-day interactions. At first, James sees his sexual relationship with Wendy as a tool, intended to hurt both Wendy and Peter. Likewise, Wendy starts off as an inexperienced sexual partner and finds herself excited by the hints of violence in James’s approach to sex. Ultimately, while sex between the two characters first displays a deep level of inequality and problematic (if consensual) violence, their sexual encounters eventually transform into more legitimate expressions of love and intimacy despite the persistence of psychological and emotional dysfunction within their relationship.

For James, the main positive transition occurs after Wendy engages in vaginal intercourse, thus “losing her virginity” in the traditional sense. The next day, James is no longer aroused by the thought of Wendy in pain, and this indicates a significant shift from abuse to romance on his part, even though his subsequent suspicions of Wendy’s betrayal will cause him to temporarily revert to his violent default behavior before finally “reforming” for good. From the beginning of the novel, James highlights how his attraction to Wendy is unlike other attractions he has felt in the past, and, by the end of the novel, after “possessing” Wendy’s body in a way no other man has, James is able to admit that he loves Wendy—an emotion that he thought was entirely foreign to him—and allows her more freedom of movement. James’s phrasing before the conclusion of the novel—“the woman who’s become the center of [his] universe” (257)—signals a change in James’s motivations, as well. Previously, revenge was the center of James’s universe, but Wendy has usurped that role through their relationship. This phrasing also plays into the involuntary terminology used throughout the novel, as James and Wendy both consistently refer to their arousal as being almost against their will, even in situations that run counter to such arousal.

For Wendy, inherently violent sexual encounters play an even more intense role in the development of her character. Her specific fetish for being choked by her partner places her in a unique position, for each time she consents to being choked, the novel portrays this form of sexual connection and arousal in a paradoxically positive light despite the overt imagery of male violence, dominance, and threat that such a scene embodies. As James becomes increasingly violent in his more practical interactions with Wendy as the primary revenge plot develops, the memory of being choked by him serves a dual purpose of increasing Wendy’s fear and heightening the reader’s doubt about James’s true motivations. Ultimately, the novel’s transition from mock violence for sexual benefit to true violence in the form of kidnapping, imprisonment, and psychological abuse is jarring, and Wendy rightly wonders whether she has made the right choice to be with James. However, the conventions of the dark-romance novel ultimately triumph over logical considerations that would prevail in a real-life setting, and thus, as the submissive female protagonist, Wendy eventually decides to trust the quasi-villainous antihero of the piece, throwing her lot in with James and building a somewhat improbable “happily ever after” existence with him. In the world of the novel, just as James comes to see Wendy as the center of his universe, Wendy, too, comes to see James as a trustworthy and loving partner.

Women’s Struggle for Independence in a Patriarchal World

The women in Hooked share a common reliance on the men of the novel, and they repeatedly undercut each other for the benefit of men, but Wendy transcends that dependence by the end. Moira is dependent on James, and, though she ultimately betrays him, she does so as an act not of independence but of dependence on a different man, Smee. Likewise, Maria is dedicated to James, lashing out at Wendy. Maria’s irritation with Wendy does not fade until Maria has attached herself to a new man, Curly. Tina, the most directly violent of the women in the novel, hates Wendy for interfering in her relationship with Peter, and she ultimately dies fighting to get closer to Peter. Wendy, though initially dependent on Peter, fights for her independence on multiple fronts, such as getting a job at the Vanilla Bean, choosing to initiate encounters with James, and finally disobeying both James and Peter by shooting Tina and Peter to save James. Wendy’s story is one that reflects a development in maturity, though extreme in terms of violence and sexuality, that mirrors the necessary steps toward independence from the traditional, patriarchal cycle of women being transferred from fathers to husbands. Under traditional patriarchy, Wendy initially seems to be following the path from being her father’s possession, his “little shadow,” to becoming her husband’s property, James’s “darling.” However, Wendy breaks out of this cycle, establishing herself as an equitable partner in her relationship while shedding the oppression of her father.

In the beginning of the novel, Wendy has moved to Massachusetts to be closer to her father, and she laments that he is not as close with her as he once was. Though this is ultimately due to Peter’s business affairs and resentment for Jon, Wendy is experiencing a period in which she needs to be herself, independent of her parent’s will. A sudden shift occurs at the gala, as Wendy clearly chooses James over Peter. Peter suspects that Wendy is just “acting out for attention” (200), but Wendy is actively choosing James as a partner. However, “attention” is a root cause of her choice, as James has been doting on Wendy up until the kidnapping. The real moment of subversion, when Wendy subsequently rejects James’s attempts to control her, comes in the conclusion of the novel, when James, like Peter, tries to get Wendy to put down her gun. At first, Wendy does “as he says, lowering the weapon,” an act linked with another pet name, “darling” (290). However, When Peter moves to shoot James, who is “ready and willing to accept his fate” (290), Wendy shoots Peter instead, forging her own future with James, rather than allowing the men to decide the future for her.

Wendy is therefore the only female character in the novel who takes charge of her own destiny, though her bid for independence remains essentially incomplete, given that it is inherently linked to her male counterpart. It is only once Wendy finds her independence—and once her competitors for James’s attention are dead or have admitted defeat and moved on—that Wendy can forge meaningful relationships with her friends Angie and Maria again. In this way, the novel reinforces the stereotypes of female infighting in place of fighting the patriarchy, though Wendy’s place as an equal to James at the end of the novel lends hope to a future where men and women share equal roles, even in the midst of a criminal underworld otherwise dominated by the most toxic of male stereotypes.

The Fine Line Between Criminality and Villainy

Though many of the characters in Hooked are criminals, there is a distinction drawn between what is criminal and what is villainous. In the beginning of the novel, James seems to be wholeheartedly his persona, Hook, who is both a leader in his and Ru’s criminal enterprise and a violent villain. James’s intentions with Wendy are immediately manipulative, and his interactions seem cold and emotionless. The exception to this demeanor is Ru, with whom James is clearly close. The gifted lighter, inscribed with “straight on ’til morning,” is a symbol of James and Ru’s friendship, and this friendship indicates a personality that is deeper and softer than that of a villain. Likewise, as the story develops, James becomes less and less villainous as he focuses more on protecting and supporting Wendy and Jon rather than as using Wendy as a tool of his revenge against Peter. The true villain of the novel, then, is Peter himself, since he is the only character who shows no remorse and no connection with his own family and friends. By contrast, even Smee even possesses the emotion-based motivation of avenging his father’s death, and he further combines this goal with the generally altruistic intention of taking over James’s criminal empire and treating the Lost Boys better than James does himself. If a criminal is an individual who commits crimes, then the meaningful distinction between the criminal and the villain must come down to intent and motivation; because even James’s darkest motivations have their basis in human emotion and a sense of avenging past wrongs, he is firmly rooted in the category of a criminal rather than a villain, despite his violent tendencies. On the other hand, Peter’s emotionless nature and complete disregard for those he is meant to love places him within the categories of both criminal and villain.

At the gala, Peter establishes his villainhood by refusing to step in on Wendy’s behalf. James threatens to kill Wendy in Peter’s place, and Peter allows it, though James does not follow through on his threat. This same sacrifice is repeated in the final scenes with Smee, as Peter reveals that he instructed Smee to kidnap Wendy as a means of hurting James. This is an ironic reversal, as James had previously targeted Wendy as a tool to hurt Peter, and he is now the victim of the same methodology. Though he threatens Wendy frequently, James shows himself to be more than a villain in his reluctance to hurt Wendy, even when he is convinced that Wendy has betrayed him. Peter experiences no such hesitation, even though he is Wendy’s father. Similarly, James takes care of Jon without alerting anyone to his actions. When Wendy finds out about James’s daily phone calls to Rockford Prep, she is surprised, and James’s intent becomes clear. James is only calling Rockford to make sure that Jon is all right, and these calls are not a part of any plan to manipulate or control Wendy, nor are they part of the plan to get revenge on Peter. Such a purely selfless and supportive pattern of behavior subverts the expectations of a villain, though no amount of altruism can reverse James’s criminal lifestyle.

At the end of the novel, James has forsaken the justification for his revenge, as, when he is about to lunge at Smee, he surrenders to protect Wendy. Surrounded by enemies and inches from taking his revenge, James finds that all he “can focus on now is the fact that [Starkey] has his gun pressed to Wendy’s temple,” as James scans not for a way to kill Smee or Peter but for signs to see “if she’s been hurt again” (281). This shift in concern is consistent with the developments in James’s personality over the course of the novel, culminating in a parallel shift from antagonist and villain to defender and hero. Though James is not able to save Wendy himself, his intent is no longer blind vengeance but measured support and protection for his loved ones. In the epilogue, James intends to continue his criminal lifestyle, but it is equally clear that Wendy, Jon, and his children are the most important elements in his life, leaving villainhood behind.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Emily McIntire