40 pages • 1 hour read
Sarah SmarshA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
This chapter deals with the particular difficulties and a few surprising positives of being a woman from an impoverished background. One of the surprising benefits Smarsh finds in her upbringing is a lack of traditional expectations and gender roles. The women in her life are not regarded as less capable, and many are the family breadwinners. Of course, this is due to the fact that everyone must work, and work hard, to make ends meet regardless of gender.
Smarsh also proudly points out that Kansas has a history of being more forward-thinking than much of the country when it comes to women’s rights. In 1867 the state held a referendum vote on women’s suffrage and eventually gave women the right to vote in 1912, eight years before the rest of the country.
Despite this, women in poverty are separated from the feminist movement; for them, working is not liberation, it is a necessity: “class and its implications for literacy and access decide what feminism looks like in action” (212).
However, though the women in Smarsh’s life work as hard as the men and often in the same jobs, they nevertheless often find themselves dependent on men. Working class women make significantly less money than men for the same job, and pregnancy brings other responsibilities. For example, Betty married the extremely violent and abusive Ray at 16 and he continued to influence her life for years—even once shooting her in the arm. Although his abuse was illegal, there was no practical way for her to get help. In the end, she was saved by her own will to escape.
Still, she was forced to rely on men by the judicial system that said she needed a stable marriage to win back her son, Bo. So, she went on a “marrying kick” (216). Although she eventually found men who were less violent, though still with issues like infidelity, she never was truly independent.
This changed when Betty got a job at the Wichita courts, which provided stability and reasonably good money. She even joined the police reserves as one of the few women on the force. With this stability and being married to Arnie, she tried once again to regain custody of her son. However, her history of being “a woman in poverty, beholden to so many men over the years” meant that she lost again and for the final time (224). Betty fought hard and eventually pulled herself up into a more stable life. As Smarsh says: “economic power is social power. In the end, for all her hard work and tenacity, the poor woman lacks both” (225).
Growing up as a poor female, Smarsh remembers middle school as the happiest time of her life. It was a time when she was old enough to roam free around the countryside independently, but before she had physically matured enough to be objectified by men. She recalls this as the true feeling of freedom. During that time, she lived on the farm with Betty and Arnie and went to a small rural school. As a member of the track team, she recalls how the Amish girls would always win the races, proving once again that “doing ‘men’s work’ as a female can develop an inner defiance that, channeled to your legs, will win a race. Even if you’re running in a skirt” (228).
Though she was extremely happy living on the farm, the death and funeral of Dorothy, Betty’s mother, made Smarsh miss her own mother. She moved back in with Jeannie; this only lasted only a few months before she returned to the farm.
For Smarsh, “the horror of being financially reliant upon a man who hits you, blows town, cheats on you, disrespects you, and generally works less than you do was so deep in the women” she understands it implicitly (232). This contributes to her resolution to do well in high school, get a scholarship, and chase new opportunities while avoiding pitfalls like teen pregnancy. Therefore, she avoids drinking, drugs, and sex, working to always do the right thing; this is both what she’s always been taught and a rebellion against the life path expected of her.
Smarsh understands why most women with her background tend to repeat hardscrabble lives because she knows that “for many poor women, there is a violence to merely existing; the pregnancies without health care, the unchecked harassment while waiting tables, the repetitive physical jobs” and the abusive men, who are harder to escape when poor (236). This legacy of sustained violence contributed to her own mother, Jeannie, having deep love inside of her but being unable to express that love.
However, Smarsh has also witnessed how older women in her community survive, being capable of deep love but also capable of going into fighting mode. She witnesses this with Betty, who retires early due to an injury and is diagnosed with chronic fatigue—likely a side effect of her hard life. She becomes argumentative with Arnie but at the same time displays “the unsentimental power that came with the struggles of a poor woman’s life: a dry humor rather than a sense of victimhood” (245).
Smarsh asserts that there is a quiet sense of power that comes with being a woman, especially a woman in poverty: wisdom. This was “a power no one could take from them. It was a way of seeing the world that they crafted themselves” (246). Smarsh is immensely proud of this part of her heritage.
In the final chapter, Smarsh explores her own role as a person who bridges two worlds. She is a link between the city and the country, the working class and the middle class. However, it was only by leaving her family, the farm, and her class that she was able to garner financial stability. Although she was able to better her circumstances, she points out that it is a sad failure that there is no way for people in the working class to truly thrive except by escape.
She also explains that “economic inequality is one cultural divide that causes us to see one another as stereotypes, some of which allow the powerful to make harmful decisions in policy and politics” (251). By way of example, she returns to the story of Betty and her son, Bo. Although Betty strove to be a part of Bo’s life and regain custody, political policies worked against her. However, Betty and Bo did eventually reunite later in life. Smarsh credits this to Betty’s unflagging belief that justice is always worth the fight, a belief that many working-class people give up due to the pain of circumstance.
Smarsh also describes how, even though she was able to leave home and go to college, this was not without its struggles as well. Although she was impoverished, she didn’t qualify for aid because the forms did not ask the right questions to understand her circumstances. To pay for her education, she considered joining the marines, but eventually was awarded scholarships.
Once at college, she saw clearly for the first time the economic rift: on one side was her community of “laborers, workers, people filled with distrust for the systems that had been ignoring and even spurning them for a couple of decades” and on the other was “people who run those same systems—basically, people with college funds who end up living in cities or moving to one of the expensive coasts” (260). She experienced this disconnect firsthand as she often worked 2-3 jobs to pay for school.
In college, many people Smarsh meets are awestruck and fascinated by her upbringing. She finds that the distance between the two worlds is growing because so few people like her, who are from the impoverished working class, ever go to college and tell their stories.
While she is in college, Grandpa Arnie dies and she returns to the farm for the funeral, which is emotional. She witnesses the farm auction, where fellow working-class farmers bid high on items as a sign of respect for Arnie. Although Betty remarries within two years, she keeps the farm for a decade before selling it and Smarsh describes helping Betty clean out the farmhouse when it is eventually sold.
Also, while in college, Smarsh becomes more politically aware. At first, she identifies as a Republican because her parents are. She explores how so many working-class people are Republican because “Democrats help people, and Republicans help people help themselves” (272). The Republican party is built on the idea of the American Dream, where hard work leads to success. However, the more Smarsh studies, the more she realizes that this is not the case: if you are born poor then you are likely to stay poor, regardless of hard work.
Smarsh tells the reader how she is often asked how she “got out” of the life she was born into. Although she acknowledges that, in certain ways, this is true, she feels like she is still very much a part of that world. She lives in Kansas and is close to her family, many of whom are still impoverished. She still has the mindset and experiences of a poor white girl growing up in farm country. She explains that “to experience economic poverty in a country famous for its abundance is to live with constant reminders of what you don’t have” and so she had to go to places that people with material wealth never have to experience (281). This has shaped her, and she is proud to still be a part of that world. She lives in two worlds simultaneously, because, as she reminds the reader, class is simply a construct.
She believes that her greatest fortune, and the thing that allowed her to break many harmful cycles in her heritage, is her refusal to internalize the idea that being poor is a failure or in some way objectively bad. She never believed that, and so was able to reach out for something more. However, she acknowledges that she had help and some advantages along the way that many working-class people do not.
Finally, Smarsh returns to August, the imaginary daughter who helps her through many difficult situations. The day she finally gives up the idea of August is the day she realizes that a child of hers will not be born into the same circumstances she was. The trajectory of her life has changed enough that her child will not grow up impoverished.
She ends the book by speaking to August one last time, saying that “this country has failed its children, August, failed its own claims about democracy and humanity” (288). Still, she remains hopeful for the future and for the idea of a fair economy where being born working class does not mean a lifetime of struggle and violence. She believes that “the best version of so many things has been conceived but remains unborn” but might be somewhere in the bright future (288).
In this section, Smarsh again returns to the issue of gender in poverty. Gender differences in her community are less explicit—no one ever told her she should behave differently than boys. However, gender differences are felt more acutely in poor communities, and result in women becoming dependent on men for one reason or another. Worse still, these men are often abusive or violent.
Although Smarsh herself was fortunate to never directly experience domestic abuse, she does recall being happiest before she was old enough to be objectified for her body. This is the no-win situation of being poor and female—to be expected to work just as hard as men, but to be a victim to double the dangers and negative effects of poverty. This makes it extremely difficult for women, especially women with children, to ever escape these circumstances. It is telling that even Betty, who had a good career working for the state government, was never able to “escape” her class.
In the final section, Smarsh at last confronts the fact that, unlike so many women in her life, she was able to break the cycle of poverty and enter the middle class. She owns a home, has a stable job, and is highly educated. She is careful to avoid being used as an example for the argument against what she is trying to say about the cyclical nature of poverty. In fact, the closing chapter serves as Smarsh establishing her own credentials for writing the book. She is one of the few people who can and does walk in both worlds—the world of poverty and the world of plenty.
The point she makes at the end is that the divide between these two worlds is one based primarily on ignorance. So few people are able to break the cycle that few people in the upper classes understand what life is like in poverty. With the book as a whole, Smarsh is putting her money where her mouth is. She is telling what it is like “to experience economic poverty in a country famous for its abundance” (281). She is telling her story. She is bearing witness for those still struggling in poverty, the millions of people striving for the American Dream but who are unlikely to ever achieve it.
Business & Economics
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
#CommonReads 2020
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Memoir
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Poverty & Homelessness
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection