60 pages • 2 hours read
John Grisham, Jim McCloskeyFramed: Astonishing True Stories of Wrongful Convictions
Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2024A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapters 3-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Chapter 3 Summary: “Autopsy Games by John Grisham”
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death and child death.
The third chapter—written by Grisham—delves into the history, evolution, and misuse of forensic autopsies, ultimately showcasing the disturbing consequences of flawed and unethical forensic practices. The narrative traces the roots of autopsies, from their early use by the Greeks and Romans, to their emergence as a critical tool in criminal investigations by the 19th century, to the establishment of the American Board of Pathology in 1936 to standardize the practice. Despite these advancements, Grisham illustrates how the field became vulnerable to corruption and malpractice through figures like Dr. Steven Hayne and Dr. Michael West, whose actions led to catastrophic miscarriages of justice.
Hayne, nicknamed “The Cadaver King” (62), exploited Mississippi’s fragmented forensic system in the late 20th century to corner the autopsy market. With a staggering volume of cases—at one point claiming to perform up to 2,000 autopsies annually—Hayne operated under questionable circumstances. His small morgue became notorious for unsafe and unsanitary conditions, as bodies were stacked and cross-contamination was common. Though he lacked proper forensic certification, Hayne’s testimony often carried weight in court, largely due to his charm and ability to align findings with prosecution narratives.
West, a self-proclaimed forensic expert, frequently collaborated with Hayne, particularly in bite mark analysis—a practice widely regarded as pseudoscience. West’s so-called “West Phenomenon,” a method involving ultraviolet light and yellow goggles, was used to identify marks on bodies that other experts failed to see. However, this method lacked scientific validation and often produced unreliable results. West’s overreach extended to fabricating evidence, as seen in cases where he applied dental molds directly onto victims’ skin to create bite marks that “matched” suspects’ teeth.
The chapter recounts the wrongful convictions of Levon Brooks and Kennedy Brewer, two men falsely accused of child murders based largely on Hayne’s and West’s flawed testimonies. Both cases followed a disturbing pattern: lack of credible evidence, coerced testimonies from traumatized children, and reliance on bite mark analysis. Brooks was convicted of murdering Courtney Smith, despite numerous alibi witnesses, while Brewer faced a death sentence for the murder of Christine Jackson, even after DNA evidence excluded him as the perpetrator. In both instances, the real killer, Justin Johnson, who had been overlooked despite compelling evidence, later confessed to the crimes.
Grisham highlights the systemic failures that enabled such miscarriages of justice, including judicial complacency and prosecutorial bias. Bite mark analysis, despite being discredited by leading scientific organizations, continued to hold sway in Mississippi courts, with appellate judges often endorsing its use. The chapter also critiques the culture of tunnel vision in law enforcement, where initial assumptions about suspects dictate the course of investigations, leading to wrongful arrests and convictions.
The eventual exonerations of Brooks and Brewer, facilitated by the Innocence Project and advances in DNA testing, exposed the deep flaws in Mississippi’s forensic and judicial systems. However, their releases came only after decades of imprisonment, with minimal compensation and no formal apology. The chapter concludes with Johnson’s confession and conviction, but not before illustrating the human cost of corrupted forensic practices and the perils of pseudoscientific evidence in the pursuit of justice.
Chapter 4 Summary: “Last Night Out by Jim McCloskey”
In this chapter, McCloskey recounts the harrowing story of three young soldiers—Mark Jones, Kenneth “Kenny” Gardiner, and Dominic “Dino” Lucci—who were wrongfully convicted of murder in Savannah, Georgia, in 1992. This chapter traces the events that led to their arrests, the injustices they faced during the investigation and trial, and the societal dynamics that fueled their convictions.
Their story begins on the night before Jones’s planned wedding. After a rehearsal dinner in Hinesville, Georgia, Jones and his friends Gardiner and Lucci set out for a night out to celebrate his last evening as a bachelor. Their plans, however, were derailed by club entry restrictions due to Jones being underage. They ultimately ended up at Club Asia in Savannah after navigating police barricades near the scene of a murder that had occurred earlier that evening.
Unbeknownst to them, the murder of Stanley Jackson, a Black man with a history of drug use, had taken place in a neighborhood infamous for its high crime rate. James White, a nearby resident, claimed to have witnessed the shooting and described the assailants as white men in a car. The soldiers’ vehicle coincidentally matched the vague description given by White, setting the stage for their arrests.
The investigation into the murder was marred by systemic flaws and racial tensions. At a time when Savannah’s Black community was expressing outrage over the disparate treatment of crimes involving Black victims, local authorities appeared eager to secure convictions to appease public anger. The soldiers, who had no criminal records, no connection to the victim, and no motive, were scapegoated in a politically charged environment.
The prosecution’s case relied heavily on White’s identification of the soldiers’ car and, later, of the men themselves. However, his initial accounts were inconsistent, and his identification was influenced by police pressure and community leaders. Other prosecution witnesses provided dubious and conflicting testimony. For instance, Sylvia Wallace claimed that Jones had made racist remarks about planning to shoot a Black man, but her statements were contradicted by multiple reliable witnesses.
Despite presenting solid alibis and highlighting the impossibility of the timeline proposed by the prosecution, the defense could not overcome the racially charged atmosphere and the prosecution’s tactics, which included portraying the soldiers as thrill seekers motivated by racism. The jury convicted all three men, and they were sentenced to life imprisonment in a rushed sentencing process.
The chapter also delves into the aftermath of the convictions, revealing the resilience of the soldiers and their families over the next 26 years. With the help of Centurion Ministries, new evidence was uncovered, including White’s recantation of his testimony and a previously suppressed police report indicating that other individuals were likely responsible for racially motivated violence that night. Despite repeated legal setbacks, the soldiers were eventually exonerated in 2017 after the Georgia Supreme Court ruled that their convictions were tainted by suppressed evidence and unreliable testimony.
McCloskey emphasizes the significant impact of this miscarriage of justice on the soldiers’ lives. Their wrongful imprisonment robbed them of decades of freedom, leaving lasting scars, including post-traumatic stress disorder and difficulty reintegrating into society. Yet their families’ support and eventual financial compensation provided a semblance of stability as they tried to rebuild their lives.
This chapter sheds light on how racial, systemic biases, and political pressures within a criminal justice system already rife with racial inequity can lead to devastating consequences for the innocent, highlighting the need for vigilance in the pursuit of justice.
Chapters 3-4 Analysis
In this part, the authors examine the fragility of the justice system, revealing how flawed forensic practices, racial bias, and coerced testimonies can lead to wrongful convictions with devastating personal and societal consequences. They emphasize the ethical dilemmas and systemic failures that undermine justice using vivid anecdotes, detailed case studies, expert testimonies, and the voices of those wrongfully accused, creating a narrative that exposes the human cost of institutional shortcomings.
The authors employ a writing style that is both accessible and authoritative—a straightforward narrative voice that emphasizes the gravity of the subject matter and reiterates the Systemic Flaws in the Criminal Justice System. For instance, Grisham begins Chapter 3 with a historical anecdote about Julius Caesar’s autopsy, creating a bridge between the ancient roots of forensic investigation and its modern evolution. This opening sets a tone of historical continuity, while the mentions of figures like Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo contextualize autopsies as a pursuit of scientific understanding rather than just criminal evidence. These references establish a contrast between the noble origins of the practice and the subsequent abuses detailed in the chapter.
The authors intertwine individual stories with broader discussions of forensic malpractice, using personal narratives to bring systemic issues to life. For instance, Dr. Hayne’s astonishing claim of performing over 2,000 autopsies in a year, combined with the imagery of bodies stacked “like cordwood,” paints a vivid and horrifying picture of the industrialization of forensic work. Similarly, anecdotes about Dr. West’s “West Phenomenon” and his use of Silly Putty to take dental impressions highlight the absurdities that Grisham seeks to expose. These stories resonate not only because of their shock value but also because they demonstrate the human cost of these practices. McCloskey begins Chapter 4 by drawing readers into the lives of the soldiers and their families before their arrest. This use of personal background underscores the devastating impact of the wrongful conviction, making the injustice relatable. For instance, the author captures Mark Jones’s anguish as he called his fiancée, Dawn, to inform her that he had been arrested for murder, a moment fraught with disbelief and heartbreak. This anecdote also sets the stage for the broader commentary on systemic racism and institutional failures.
The authors’ use of literary nonfiction techniques such as dialogue and direct quotes lends authenticity to the narrative while emphasizing the fallibility and hubris of key figures. For example, in Chapter 3, Grisham specifically mentions West’s declaration that bite marks were inflicted “indeed and without a doubt” by Levon Brooks (71), which showcases both his confidence and the pseudoscientific basis of his methods. Similarly, Hayne’s self-aggrandizing claim about his superhuman work ethic—“I normally sleep no more than two or three hours a day” (63)—underscores the implausibility of his assertions and hints at the lack of oversight in the forensic field.
The authors use research and expert opinions to critique forensic methodologies and emphasize The Need for Advocacy and Reform. In Chapter 3, Grisham references scientific studies, such as the 2001 analysis revealing a 63.5% error rate among bite mark experts, to underscore the unreliability of the evidence used to convict innocent individuals like Brooks and Kennedy Brewer. This integration of research situates the narrative within a broader context of scientific inquiry and critique. Grisham also employs irony and dark humor to criticize the absurdities of forensic malpractice. The “Bologna Sandwich Case” (81), in which West failed to reconcile bite mark evidence with the victim’s autopsy findings, epitomizes the farcical nature of his forensic claims. Such examples highlight the lack of accountability in the system while engaging the readers with their sheer incredulity.
The authors also integrate hard evidence and detailed timelines to debunk the prosecution’s narratives. In Chapter 4, the rigorous breakdown of the soldiers’ alibi—supported by testimonies from multiple witnesses and the logistical impossibility of their involvement—functions as a counterpoint to the prosecution’s reliance on circumstantial evidence. The precise calculation of travel times between the Golden Corral restaurant, the crime scene, and Tops Lounge dismantles the State’s timeline, showing how the accusations defied logic and geography. The detailed focus on such evidence demonstrates McCloskey’s reliance on factual clarity to build his case against injustice. References to police procedural failures, such as the suppression of the Yamacraw report and the lack of a proper identification lineup, emphasize institutional negligence. McCloskey highlights critical moments of misconduct, like James White’s coerced testimony, revealing the fragility of the prosecution’s case. White’s eventual recantation, described in his affidavit and supported by expert analysis of eyewitness unreliability under traumatic conditions, underscores how the case hinged on manipulation rather than truth.
The juxtaposition of institutional failings with individual tragedies amplifies the emotional weight of the narrative and illustrates The Persistence of Those Fighting for Justice. In Chapter 3, Grisham’s detailed recounting of the wrongful convictions of Brooks and Brewer—despite alibi witnesses and exculpatory DNA evidence—underscores the systemic indifference to justice. The authors’ emphasis that there was “[n]o explanation, no apology” following the exonerations captures their perspective on the cold bureaucracy of the system (87).
The authors’ tone alternates between narrative compassion and analytical critique, a device that reinforces their dual objectives: to evoke empathy for the wrongly accused and to indict the system that failed them. For instance, in Chapter 4, McCloskey’s portrayal of the soldiers’ post-conviction lives—marked by post-traumatic stress disorder, broken relationships, and physical ailments—adds a poignant coda to their ordeal. By sharing their struggles to reintegrate into society, McCloskey emphasizes the enduring consequences of injustice, transforming the story into a broader commentary on the human cost of systemic failure.
Related Titles
By these authors
