logo

19 pages 38 minutes read

Robert Frost

Fire and Ice

Fiction | Poem | Adult | Published in 1920

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Choices

The poem’s speaker utilizes his personal and life experience to form a decision. They choose fire first: “Some say the world will end in fire” (Line 1). The speaker maintains the stance that fire would be more destructive, comparing the fire to the realm of passions and spontaneous impulsivity: “From what I’ve tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire” (Lines 3-4). The speaker then displays a cycle of logic and decision-making by upping the ante: “But if it had to perish twice” (Line 5). They then decide “I think I know enough of hate / To say that for destruction ice” (Lines 6-7). The speaker decides that ice, despite being the opposite of fire, could be just as equally destructive. The speaker makes a choice, without choosing one over the other. At the poem’s end, the speaker states, “To say that for destruction ice / Is also great / And would suffice” (Lines 7-9). Flawed and ineffective, the speaker’s choice is a simplified dichotomy, not considering that fire and ice can mix. The speaker also posits the two choices without choosing so that readers can make the choice. Readers can follow in the speaker’s footsteps by considering both apocalyptic scenarios but not choosing, or they can side with fire or ice, or even merge the two, creating a third choice.

Fear

The speaker displays a reluctance to make a choice, as well as passivity at even being presented with two choices. The speaker’s reluctance to make a choice also represents the speaker’s lack of fear. The poem possesses few traces of emotion or worry regarding the apocalypse. The speaker distances themself from not only the decision-making but also fear and emotion by repeating the phrase “Some say”: “Some say the world will end in fire / Some say in ice” (Lines 1-2). This distancing makes the speaker’s lack of fear uncomfortable and even frightening. The speaker’s resigned attitude expresses the powerlessness of modern humanity that possesses the power to destroy itself because of its technological and industrial advances. The speaker’s disassociated tone also serves as a warning that constant exposure to violence numbs an individual. The speaker states “I think I know enough of hate” (Line 6). This serves as another warning: advancements do not necessarily lead to a peaceful existence and instead breed new fears.

Love

“Fire and Ice” relies on a mix of senses and emotions. The poem opens with the line “Some say the world will end in fire” (Line 1). The speaker reluctantly states, “From what I’ve tasted of desire / I hold with those who favor fire” (Lines 3-4). Fire represents desire, and desire can sometimes be synonymous with love. Love has many facets, including commitment and responsibility. Desire is a fundamental response to falling in love, but if handled carelessly, the emotion can turn destructive. Desire, like fire, is a huge store of energy that channels and directs in different ways. This channeling and change of direction manifests in the poem when the speaker begins considering the opposite of their initial supposition: “But if it had to perish twice / I think I know enough of hate” (Lines 5-6). The speaker then continues, “To say that for destruction ice / Is also great / And would suffice” (Lines 7-9). Romantic and erotic desire are the most common forms of love. However, the desire for materials and wealth can transform into hate, which hardens an individual’s emotions and feeds greed.

The Apocalypse

Fire can be a cleansing force, often rejuvenating landscapes as it destroys them. Ice, however, isn’t often associated with rejuvenation or regrowth. The poem’s reference to fire is also an allusion to the Bible’s Book of Revelations. Revelations 20:9 states, “And they marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, but fire came down from heaven and consumed them.” Similarly, Revelations 21:8 states, “But as for the cowardly, the faithless, the detestable, as for murderers, the sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars, their portion will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death.” Though the speaker of the poem never poses the idea that fire and ice can mix, Revelations 8:7 says, “The first angel sounded, and there followed hail and fire mingled with blood, and they were cast upon the earth: and the third part of trees was burnt up, and all green grass was burnt up.” The poem’s simple language masks its complex meaning and explores a universal meaning in the end of the world. It weighs the probability of two varying apocalyptic scenarios. Similar to Revelations, Zoroastrianism teaches that fire will devour the world, and then sinners will be punished for three days.

The poem portrays the apocalypse as a combination of two cycles—one of fire, one of ice. This cyclical structure parallels the Hindu tradition. Rather than an ultimate end, Hindu thought advocates that the world goes through a series of cycles and consists of kalpas. Within a kalpa, periods of creation, preservation, and decline exist. After a larger cycle, all creation contracts to a singularity, and then expands from a single point while the ages continue in a religious fractal pattern.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text