logo

65 pages 2 hours read

Ivan Turgenev

Fathers And Sons

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1862

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 5-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 5 Summary

Bazarov wakes early, and takes his first walk on Marino’s grounds. He declares “the place isn’t much to look at”—the “young trees hadn’t taken, too little water collected in the pond, and the wells had a brackish taste” (15). Bazarov encounters some peasant youths who are interested in his scientific search for frogs, evidence of Bazarov’s “special flair for inspiring members of the lower class” (15). He explains to the boys that he studies frogs to better understand the human body as a doctor.

Back at the house, Arkady and his father have tea. When Arkady realizes that Fenechka is not at the table because she is embarrassed, he again informs his father of his liberal views on sex, and insists, “a son has no right to judge his father” (16-17). Arkady feels magnanimous after this declaration and insists he will go see Fenechka to make her more comfortable. Nikolai is overcome with many emotions, among them the possibility of an “inevitable strangeness” between himself and his son, and that perhaps his approach has created a lack of “respect” that remaining silent could have prevented (17). Arkady returns and reports his delight in his new baby brother, and father and son embrace. Pavel enters and spares them from the emotional scene.

As before, Pavel is dressed in the English style. Pavel inquires after Bazarov’s whereabouts, and Arkady explains that his friend is busy with work and that Bazarov is staying with them briefly before visiting his own parents. Pavel recalls that Bazarov’s father was a regimental doctor at the same time as his own father was in the military, and asks for more information about the young man.

Arkady smiles and pronounces his friend a “nihilist,” which horrifies his uncle—this is the philosophy of a person who “respects nothing” (19). Arkady argues that to be a nihilist simply means to “approach things from a critical point of view” (19) and take no idea “on faith” (19). Pavel objects that faith is the bedrock of all civilization, scornfully sneering, “before there were Hegelists, now we have nihilists. We’ll see how you fare in a void, a vacuum” (18).

Pavel asks his brother to ring for cocoa, which Fenechka brings. Fenechka, “twenty three years old, all fair and soft, with red childlike lips and sweet little hands,” blushes in Pavel’s presence, as she “seemed ashamed that she’d come, and at the same time seemed to feel that she had a right to come” (19-20). Bazarov arrives covered in mud from his adventures, and explains that he must see to his frogs. Pavel is dismissive, snarking, “‘he doesn’t believe in principles, but he believes in frogs’” (20). Arkady receives this remark “with pity” in his gaze, and Pavel responds by discussing estate matters instead.

Chapter 6 Summary

As Bazarov drinks tea, Nikolai asks him where he went. Bazarov describes the area and a nest of snipe he found, suggesting Arkady might hunt there—Bazarov himself does not hunt. Pavel asks Bazarov about his study of physics with “secret irritation” at the younger man’s “free and easy manner” (21). When Pavel presses Bazarov on his beliefs, Bazarov says he rejects experts: “why should I acknowledge them, and what am I to believe in? They tell me what it’s all about, I agree, and that’s that” (21).

Pavel changes the topic to the question of the Germans, who have become a nation of middling scientists, a step down from their former age of literary icons like Goethe and Schiller. Bazarov argues that science is “more useful” than poetry, which further outrages Pavel (21). However, when Pavel protests, Bazarov asserts that science is also a charade. Completely unhinged, Pavel demands to know what other aspects of “conventions accepted in human society” younger man disregards (22). Bazarov asks if this is an “interrogation” and before he can answer, Nikolai changes the subject (22).

To diffuse the tension, Nikolai expresses hope that Bazarov’s scientific knowledge may be of use on the family estate. Pavel laments, not entirely sincerely, that country life has made him out of touch with the latest intellectual trends—to the young people, he is an “‘old fogy’” (22). The older men leave to see to estate matters.

When Arkady upbraids his friend for his poor behavior, Bazarov scoffs, “am I supposed to pander to them, these provincial aristocrats?” (22), and argues that it is Pavel’s own fault for choosing a quieter life outside the capital. Arkady argues that his uncle is “more deserving of compassion than mockery” (23).

Chapter 7 Summary

Arkady tells Bazarov about Pavel. Pavel was an attractive young man, “self-assured, somewhat sarcastic, and amusingly acrimonious” (23). Popular and sociable where his brother was more introverted, Pavel had only a smattering of education, but “At the age of twenty eight he had already attained the rank of captain. A brilliant career lay ahead of him” (23).

At a ball, Pavel met Princess R, an unhappily married, sociable coquette by day, and a haunted and deeply spiritual woman by night. These nights would be followed by more social whirl, as she would “throw herself into anything that could afford her the least bit of pleasure” (24). They fell in love, but her love was inconstant, as she “wrote letters to a man she hardly knew” rather than to her new beloved. Pavel called her his sphinx after a ring he had given her in this shape, and he “almost lost his mind” during periods when she paid him less attention (24). She left Russia to escape him, but he followed, “first pursuing her, then deliberately losing sight of her. He was ashamed, indignant at his own weakness” (25). They renewed their passion briefly in Switzerland, but soon realized “the flame had flared up for the last time and gone out forever” (25). Pavel Petrovich returned to Russia and found life there unsatisfying. A decade went by, and he learned that the princess had died in a fit of mental illness.

While the Kirsanov brothers were distant when Nikolai was happily married, they drew closer after the women in their lives died. Pavel resigned himself to the “troubled, twilight phase of life” and moved in with his brother (26). He never left the countryside, though was respected and esteemed in the neighborhood for his excellent manners and for his wild romantic past.

Arkady concludes his tale and tells Bazarov “it’s a sin to despise” his kind and generous uncle (27). Bazarov insists that a man who has ruined his life over a woman is “no longer a man, not even a male of the species” and he dismisses the idea that liberal newspapers and occasional kindness to a peasant should allow anyone to think himself “a worthwhile person” (27). When Arkady posits that his uncle is a product of his upbringing, Bazarov counters that it is up to each man to influence himself rather than be influenced by the outside world. He claims that this is how he lives his life.

Chapters 5-7 Analysis

These chapters introduce in detail the philosophy that guides Bazarov’s life—nihilistic empiricism, or a rejection of tradition, faith, and art as values. The novel places the four main characters on a spectrum. Bazarov and Pavel are on opposite extremes—Bazarov claims to believe in no authority, to admire the precision of science, and to reject aesthetics altogether; while Pavel based his life around an ungovernable and doomed passion for a woman, and now lives mostly for upper-class aesthetics (perfect manners, self-care, card playing), extolling literature as the highest intellectual pursuit. Bazarov speaks highly only of German intellectuals, while Pavel holds up England as his model. Arkady is in the middle—he clearly highly esteems Bazarov and wants his approval, but is also drawn to the emotional story of his uncle’s life and to the familial love that is his anchor. Poor Nikolai is also trapped in the middle, but less because of his philosophical stance and more because of his timid, peacemaking, and gentle personality.

These views translate from the personal to the political. As the emancipation of the serfs looms in the background, Bazarov and Pavel display two different models of interacting with the peasant class. Bazarov, who dismisses feeling in favor of what is measurable and observable, attempt to teach some peasant boys science. Pavel, on the other hand, keeps the peasants at a remove, preferring to patronize them with financial generosity rather than personal contact. Arkady, as ever, is the middle ground. On the one hand, he dissuades his father from shame over his romantic relationship with former servant, Fenechka, instead welcoming his new stepbrother as a member of the family. On the other hand, he can see only poverty and degradation when he looks at the estate and its serfs.

Both Bazarov and Pavel are faintly ridiculous extremes. The arrogant and rude Bazarov’s unreasonable stance is epitomized by his clearly silly idea that studying frogs will allow him to understand humanity. Meanwhile, Pavel’s love of literature comes from a meager “four or five books in French”—the only basis for considering him an intellectual. The novel gives us no real reason to see why it is ennobling that he has spent much of his life doing nothing due to his failed love affair. If Bazarov is an example of the Russian superfluous man figure, then Pavel evokes the pointless tragic heroes of the European Romantic literary tradition, including Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther or the heroes of Lord Byron. Neither figure is entirely sympathetic. Turgenev’s aim is to depict the generational clash, not to idealize either camp.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text