39 pages • 1 hour read
J.B. PriestleyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: The source material and this section of the guide include references to death by suicide, addiction, and rape.
An Inspector Calls is a play explicitly about class conflict. Arthur Birling decries the horrors of socialism in Act I. By the end of Act III, he has been exposed as a pompous hypocrite who refuses to accept his role in the suffering of others. Meanwhile, Inspector Goole clearly articulates an argument for socialism and the need for everyone in society to help one another. In the broadest possible terms, the play criticizes those who seek the continuation of a stratified class system that exploits and alienates the poorest people in society, while the play portrays those who advocate for a more egalitarian society in a positive light.
Arthur Birling is the clear representative of the status quo of early 20th century Britain. He is not coy about his political beliefs. Even as the family are celebrating Sheila’s engagement, Arthur chooses this evening to deliver a long, rambling speech about the importance of self-reliance and self-enrichment. He is a capitalist, a factory owner who has grown wealthy by paying people as little as possible to produce as much as possible. Arthur believes that this makes him a “hard-headed, practical man of business” (166). Arthur follows up this claim by dismissing any fears that Europe might suffer from a war. The play is set in 1912 and written in the aftermath of two World Wars. The audience is well aware that Arthur’s declarations should not be taken seriously, thanks to the use of dramatic irony. The credibility of his views about class and capitalism are given the same weight as his views about war. Namely, Arthur chooses to ignore everything that contradicts his worldview so as to buffer his own belief in his own self-importance and innocence. He dismisses “labor agitations and all these silly little war scares” in the same speech (166), illustrating just how poorly he understands the world. The play treats Arthur as a pompous, anachronistic representative of a bygone era, before World War I and World War II fundamentally reshaped the terrain of the British class structure. He refuses to grasp the exploitative nature of capitalism just as he refuses to grasp his role in Eva Smith’s death.
Inspector Goole brings the family to a point of reckoning. The wealth and decadence that allows them to throw such a party is made possible through the exploitation of workers in Arthur’s factories. The inspector juxtaposes the champagne and servants with the dead woman in the morgue, suggesting that they are all products of the same system. In his final speech, Goole outlines the ease with which the Birlings have risen to their station. Eva’s death is not an anomaly, he says, as “there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths” (207). The Birling family and the capitalist class at large are as equally responsible for this suffering as they are complicit in Eva’s death by suicide. Goole exists to draw attention to this and to condemn the family for their refusal to acknowledge what Goole believes to be a fundamental truth. The inspector leaves the family with an opportunity to reflect on the privileges afforded to them by their social class. Instead, just a few lines later, Arthur is dismissing Goole as “probably a Socialist or some sort of crank” (211). Class conflict will continue, the play implies, because those who benefit from the class system refuse to acknowledge its fundamental flaws.
An Inspector Calls is an example of a drawing-room play, a genre typically set in the lavish homes of the wealthy. Traditionally, this setting operated in accordance with the material status of the characters and the audience: Drawing-room plays featured wealthy people and were performed for wealthy people. An Inspector Calls uses the tradition of drawing-room theater to peek behind the veil of the British upper class in the early 20th century. The play deliberately creates a dichotomy between the public and the private spheres. In public, the Birling family are an upstanding example of how to succeed in society. They have been richly rewarded for Arthur’s work as a factory owner and a local politician and are swiftly ascending the social ladder. Indeed, the only thing Arthur believes could threaten his status is a public scandal. To the outside world, however, they are beyond reproach, and such a scandal seems unlikely. Then Inspector Goole arrives. He enters into their private space and threatens their pristine reputation, forcing them to confess to their darkest secrets. The domestic setting of the play becomes important, as it takes the audience into the private sphere of a family whose public image is immaculate. Shining reputations, the play suggests, are built on a foundation of private scandal.
The Birling family hide many secrets through their refusal to address certain aspects of themselves. In the opening act, Sheila hints at Eric’s alcohol addiction, but she is quickly shut down by Sybil, who insists that she adhere to social convention and refrain from discussing private matters in front of a guest. Sybil uses the public performativity of manners to cover up private embarrassments and deviations from the social norm. In a similar way, Gerald uses his elevated status to cover up his affair. Sheila questions him about his whereabouts the previous summer and he insists that he was busy with work. Since Arthur is more than delighted to welcome Gerald into the family, he puts a stop to his daughter’s valid questions. Like Eric’s alcohol addiction, Gerald’s infidelity is hushed up and pushed into the realm of the private. His reputation and the reputation of the Birling family are too important for them to risk confronting the truth about themselves. The inspector’s arrival, however, obliterates the carefully guarded distinction between public and private. Goole, ostensibly a public employee, enters the private world of the Birling drawing room and—with the audience as his witness—forces them to confess to the many ways in which their wealth and power is built on the exploitation and mistreatment of others. He drags their dark secrets out from the private shadows and makes them known to the “public” of the audience.
The inspector’s desire to bring private sins into public is an extension of his political view. Arthur criticizes Goole as being a socialist, which he believes gives him cause to dismiss Goole’s judgment out of hand. Later, as he convinces himself that Goole was not a real police inspector, Arthur seeks to rebuild the division between private sin and public scandal. He hopes that he has gotten away with his mistakes and that he can return to ignoring the sins of his past. Gerald believes the same, encouraging Sheila to continue their engagement as though his affair has not been revealed. Arthur and Gerald’s delusion shatters in the play’s final lines. A real inspector is on the way to question them about a young woman’s death, and their sins are now likely to be exposed after all. Try as they might, they can no longer separate the private and the public.
The world of An Inspector Calls is a judgmental one. Throughout the play the characters to stand in judgment of one another, believing that they are entitled to assess the guilt or innocence of another person. Through these judgments, the characters reveal their inherent biases. Arthur is among the most judgmental of the characters. As the embodiment of the society’s capitalist ethos, he harshly judges anyone who infringes upon his own right to make money through exploitative means. When Eva and her colleagues try to advocate for higher wages, for example, he passes judgment on her. He denies wages to the workers and fires Eva to make an example of her to others. Arthur judges Eva against the capitalist ethos and finds her wanting, casting her out of the workplace as punishment for her perceived sins. During Inspector Goole’s visit, Arthur’s judgment is called into question. Fellow capitalist Gerald defends Arthur’s sound business practices and assures Arthur that he did the right thing. Eric and Sheila, meanwhile, criticize their father for his self-interested actions.
Arthur is not alone in receiving their criticism. When Sybil admits to turning Eva away from her charity, her children condemn her. Sybil had the opportunity to help Eva, but instead she judged Eva’s moral character and sent her away. Through his questioning, Goole compels Sybil to agree that the man who raped and impregnated Eva was responsible for her death. When this man is revealed to be Eric, however, Sybil refuses to judge her son, revealing her own hypocrisy and doubling down on it as she insists that she was right to act as she did. Whereas Arthur’s judgment embodies the social mores of a capitalist society, Sybil’s judgments are more personal and more vindictive. She hates the working class because she has judged them to be beneath her; she punishes Eva because she feels insulted by the young woman’s perceived insolence. Her privileged position in society affords her the power to pass judgment on others, but these judgments are not fair or just.
Inspector Goole emerges as the only fit judge of character. Importantly, he is also the only figure not connected to the Birling family. His outsider status means that he can view them impartially and—though their actions demonstrably abhor him— determines which of them are capable of change. In this way Goole offers judgment as well as the possibility of redemption. Arthur, Sybil, and Gerald refuse the opportunity to change. When Goole leaves, they search for any reason to ignore his comments and convince themselves that they are in the right. Conversely, Sheila accepts the inspector’s judgment and resolves to change. Eric, to a certain extent, also accepts the inspector’s judgment, though he is keen to minimize his own role in Eva’s death. As a result, Sheila emerges from the inspector’s judgment with credit while the other characters find themselves in a difficult situation when the curtain falls. Goole judges the family as he judges society, leaving them with the message that they are collectively responsible for change. As is evidenced by the outbreak of World War I, his advice is not heeded.