A Study in Charlotte

Fiction | Novel | YA

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Download PDF

Summary

Background

Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapters 1-3

Chapters 4-6

Chapters 7-8

Chapter 9-Epilogue

Character Analysis

Themes

Symbols & Motifs

Important Quotes

Essay Topics

Tools

Beta

Discussion Questions

Themes

Mind and Heart

Charlotte Holmes was trained from an early age to depend on her intellect. Her mind is as sharp as a scalpel, but other aspects of her temperament have been neglected. In contrast, James is of average intelligence but has a high level of emotional intelligence and an overactive conscience. As a result, the two friends find themselves in a constant tug-of-war between mind and heart. Charlotte is all mind, while James is all heart.

The novel makes some attempt to sharpen James’s observational skills when Charlotte repeatedly tries to teach him how to find evidence or how to know when someone is lying. However, the greater challenge seems to be teaching Charlotte how to feel. This isn’t simply a matter of prioritizing emotion over logic. Rather, Charlotte’s disastrous infatuation with August taught her to mistrust herself. Because she doesn’t know how to channel her emotions appropriately, her anger at being rejected develops into a desire for revenge.

Given her formidable intellect, Charlotte had no difficulty setting up a drug drop and making August and Lucien take the fall. She later tells James, “What my mother was afraid of was sentiment. […] Of my being sentimental. With my particular skill set, it’s a liability. With what I felt for August, I became…a worse person” (251). Charlotte’s particular concern isn’t that she feels emotion but that she seems incapable of controlling it. James reacts to her confession, as any person might, by noting that Charlotte’s mother was a “monster” for forbidding her daughter to feel. As Charlotte rightly points out, once her emotional floodgates open, she doesn’t know how to shut them off: “I think my mother was right. I don’t trust myself anymore. No one does” (251).

Charlotte not only loses trust in herself but also loathes the steps she took to harm August. Her self-recrimination leads her to drug use to turn off the emotions she can’t control, solving the problem of emotion by numbing herself and feeling nothing, which is also why she shuts herself off from other students and makes no effort to befriend anyone. James functions as an emotional anchor. Although he occasionally loses his temper, he doesn’t fear his own outbursts. He helps create a safe space for Charlotte to feel something. By the novel’s end, she takes the first baby steps toward integrating thought and feeling. This personal evolution would be impossible without a Watson at her side.

Family Legacies

A Study in Charlotte involves three famous families whose members all possess distinctive characteristics. The Holmeses are known for their observational powers and quest for truth. The Moriartys are just as intellectually gifted but also morally corrupt and use their gifts for selfish gain. The Watsons stand outside this clash of the titans as the loyal friends and biographers of the Holmes family.

While the novel has some fun presenting the notion that the Watsons have kept a long list of Do’s and Don’ts related to the care of their Holmes counterparts, it also makes an attempt to depict the tension between personal aspiration and family expectations. Charlotte is an obvious example of the Holmes “black sheep.” While she’s just as brilliant as her most famous ancestor, she has a drug addiction and tries to seduce her adult tutor. Her family perceives her as erratic. Milo, in particular, treats her like a child who needs constant supervision. Only at the novel’s end, after Charlotte proves more than capable of cleaning up her own mess, does her brother begin to respect her.

August Moriarty faces a similar challenge within his own family. He has chosen to become an academic and doesn’t involve himself in the Moriarty criminal empire. He even commits the cardinal sin of extending the olive branch to the Holmes clan by agreeing to tutor Charlotte. This proves to be a near-fatal mistake and one that earns the rejection of his own family. Charlotte explains this:

He’s forgiven me. He’s a sentimental fool. August even demanded his family leave me alone. I was disturbed, he told them, and no good would come of it. They listened. It was their last favor to him. You see, his family disowned him for taking my fall (252).

James experiences a different sort of problem with his own kin. He’s happy to embrace the family legacy of being a writer who documents the exploits of the Holmes detectives. However, his family group has been shattered because his father and mother divorced. Furthermore, his father remarried and now has two children with his new wife. James feels abandoned and tries to reject his father in retaliation. Fortunately, Mr. Watson has the easygoing nature of his forebears. He’s willing to tolerate James’s temper tantrums on the chance that he can reconcile with his son. This is the somewhat kinder legacy that the Watsons offer their children compared to the scorched-earth policies of the Holmes and Moriarty clans.

Fiction Versus Reality

In the novel’s world, Arthur Conan Doyle was Dr. John Watson’s literary agent, Watson was the author, and all the Holmes stories documented the cases of a real detective. This creates an interesting layer of complexity that toes the line between fiction and reality. While those in the actual “real world” are accustomed to considering the Holmes-Watson association purely fictional, A Study in Charlotte contradicts that assumption. Instead, those characters were real men whose exploits truly happened. At the same time, the novel emphasizes that Watson embellished his friend’s cases for dramatic effect. Thus, the novel introduces an element of fiction into what it defines as true-crime writing.

James falls into the trap of romanticizing his ancestor’s adventures and projecting these fantasies onto Charlotte. Before he meets her, he already has created scenarios of their amazing adventures:

I dreamed about that diamond theft for months. How I could’ve been there by her side, her trusted companion. One night, I lowered her down into the Swiss bank from a skylight, my rope the only thing holding her above the booby-trapped floor. The next, we raced through the cars of a runaway train, chased by black-masked bandits shouting in Russian (11).

Even as they investigate the real murder on campus, James slips into fantasy mode, imagining how Holmes and Watson will crack the case. While Charlotte approaches the evidence factually, James processes the experience with the eye of a writer. He’s looking for the drama and pathos in the story. This is a trait he shares with the original Watson, and the original Holmes rebuked his colleague in much the same way that Charlotte does in the novel’s Epilogue.

Keeping fact and fiction from merging becomes challenging, especially when the crimes on the campus intentionally parallel several Holmes adventures. The novel’s villain points out how fiction softens and glamorizes the facts of the detectives’ adventures. For example, Bryony sums up this dynamic: “Do you want to know why I set up Dobson’s murder as a remake of ‘The Speckled Band’? It’s a reminder. They’re stories. They’re stories, and this is real life. You are not Sherlock Holmes, and you won’t ever be” (304). Her words are ironic in that Charlotte proves just as formidable as her ancestor, and her scribe, James, proves just as sentimental as the original Watson in retelling the tale.