logo

37 pages 1 hour read

Ronald Wright

A Short History of Progress

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 5Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 5 Summary: “The Rebellion of Tools”

Previous civilizations have used advances in agricultural technique to increase yield and thereby hold off collapse. The industrial revolution is an example of such a technique and explains how “our runaway train [… of progress has] been able to keep gathering speed” (109).

We tend to think of the Industrial Revolution as a purely European contribution to the world, but this advance in human history was fueled by the Americas. Though we do not generally acknowledge it, the indigenous people of North and South America were farming peoples. Their products, such as maize and potatoes, were about twice as productive as European wheat and barley staples, doubling Europe’s resource yield when they began exporting these products home after colonization. Additionally, Europeans adopted the Inca’s use of guano fertilizer. Alongside foodstuffs, the mineral resources of the New World, especially the gold and silver of Aztecs, as well as the labor capital of human slavery, provided Europe the funds to jumpstart the Industrial Revolution.

Before European contact, the indigenous of North America lived in chiefdoms with established social hierarchies. After contact, the decrease in population [due to warfare and disease] allowed democratic societies to blossom, which inspired the American Revolution. In the final analysis, “our age [of liberty] was [both monetarily and ideologically] bankrolled by the seizing of half a planet” (117).

Popul Vuh, the Mayan creation epic, contains a story of tools rebelling against their masters. Stories similar to this “first explicit warning of the threat in the machine” (118) became common after the Industrial Revolution, when human technology began to advance at a faster rate. “Scientific Romances,” the first science fiction texts, such as Shelley’s Frankenstein and Wells’s Time Machine, began to emerge: stories articulating human fears of technology too great to control. As the first global economy took form, thinkers became aware of how automation, industrial economy, the arms race, and ecological abuse would damage society. The Victorian Age led to a century of World Wars, genocides, and atomic weapons, showing their fears were correct. The Victorian Scientific Romances evolved into two groups: mainstream science fiction and social satires. Both these genres have always had a tendency of being prophetic.

Today, due to the globalization of the world economy, social collapse will impact the entire human population. Experts predict imminent famine, warfare, and ecological disaster. While sceptics “point to earlier disasters that weren’t born out” (126), these disasters were only narrowly sidestepped (as in the case of nuclear war) or temporarily postponed (as in the case of the food shortage), and not solved. In fact, they remain possibilities.

The War on Terror that began in 2001 was a diversion of our focus from greater to lesser problems. Though catastrophic, terrorism causes exponentially fewer deaths than hunger or contaminated water. After WWII, governments committed to instituting democratically managed forms of capitalism to curb the poverty and destitution that are the building blocks of fanaticism. Today, these same governments engage in complete free-market forms of economy that leave the lower class of even developed nations more helpless than ever, and at the same time they destroy what remains of the Earth’s natural habitats. In the United States, religion has penetrated politics, recalling divine kings of old. In short “our present behaviour is typical of failed societies at the zenith of their greed and arrogance” (129). More bluntly, we live inside a “suicide machine” (131) that will kill us all if we don’t set it right. This does not require the complete overhaul of our economic systems, but it does require us to move from short term to long-term thinking in how we manage society. Though we have the tools and the means to do so, we must also make the decision.

Chapter 5 Analysis

Each of the five chapters of A Short History of Progress move through a different historical period, showing how the cultures detailed in the chapter are a development on the chapter prior and a stepping stone to the chapter following. Chapter 4, for example, provides a history of empires and their problems, leading directly to coverage of modern empires: The United States and England. This chapter behaves as a summary of all of Wright’s main points, encouraging the reader to see that the history of the American empire is not yet complete. While we can be sure that, left unchecked, it will go just the same as all the other histories Wright has already covered, it is also an opportunity to “get the future right” as he says both at the beginning and end of the chapter, framing its discussion.

The initial sections of this chapter provide an analysis of the contributing factors to population booms and busts, including agriculture and sanitation. In examining how the conquest of the New World provided new agricultural products to Europe, and the extensive and intact agricultural land needed to cultivate them, Wright provides a coverage of colonial history often left untouched. The advanced agricultural society of the New World funded the dominant economy of Europe and its staple crops. This argument is particularly well evidenced in Wright’s coverage of the economic surplus that American gold, silver, and slaves provided Europe, as well as the increased yield capacity of indigenous staple crops (113-16). Such work recontextualizes the history of the Industrial Revolution and the society it brought about.

Discussion of the Industrial Revolution and European colonization leads to brief coverage of North American society pre-contact. Illustrating how first nations peoples lived in extensive chiefdoms, Wright reminds the reader of the human predilection towards elitism. However, in his argument that the early democracies of the indigenous peoples of the Americas after European contact inspired the American Constitution, he again reminds the reader to adjust their Eurocentric vision of society.

Wright turns from this colonial history to discuss the Mayan narrative of the Rebellion of Tools. Comparing this story to Victorian science fiction, he illustrates how both this Mayan narrative and later European novels can be read as parables: short stories with didactic morals. These parables attempt to warn about the dangers of mechanization and show how across time, humanity has been wary of the machines they create. A novelist himself, Wright shows how great fiction can articulate the subconscious concerns of its time. This section is one of the better examples in the book of how Wright can use both fictional and non-fictional accounts to create a history of human culture.

In the final pages, Wright turns to a history of the American empire after WWII. These pages provide a host of startling statistics aimed to jar the reader out of their feelings of safety, their innate ideas that history has “ended” with the United States, or that this empire is somehow superior to any other. In fact, many of the examples of the American empire’s problems recall those of earlier states. For instance, the use of the war on terror to consolidate power and cultural identity recalls Wright’s earlier arguments that power must be built through antagonism. His remark that religion has penetrated politics reminds of the divine right of kings. Wright only spends a few pages on our fully modern world, illustrating how recent its history really is, and how similar it is to all the fallen pyramids that have come before it. 

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text