logo

30 pages 1 hour read

Flannery O'Connor

A Late Encounter with the Enemy

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1953

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Ultimate Inescapability of Reality

Both Sally and her grandfather spend the bulk of their lives hiding from reality, seeking escape in fantasy. Sally avoids feeling shame at her professional and academic struggles by convincing herself that she is the inheritor of a noble Southern tradition embodied in the figure of her war-hero grandfather—a heritage that marks her as inherently superior to the “upstarts” at the college. The General, for his part, happily takes on the identity of “General Tennessee Flintrock Sash”—an utter fiction created by Hollywood film producers—basking in the empty adulation showered on this fictional man as a way to avoid facing his actual, traumatic memories.

At no point in the story does the General seek insight or wisdom. In fact, he actively avoids them, steering his mind away from any contemplation of the past and insisting that “what happened then wasn’t anything to a man living now and he was living now” (163). Though he is 104 years old, he does not consider the inevitability of death, nor does he feel any desire to understand his life before leaving it. He loves parades because he associates them with life and with the present, and he hates and fears processions, which he associates with death and the past. The Hollywood film premiere—the only memory the General cares to think about—is the ultimate parade: a celebration of history that strips that history of context or meaning, transforming it into an empty spectacle divorced from both past and future. On that stage, George Poker Sash is reborn as the General, a hero whose status rests not on any actual deeds but solely on his crisp uniform and gleaming sword.

In the general’s mind, Sally’s graduation ceremony is the opposite of the film premiere. He dreads it even before it happens, thinking, “a procession full of schoolteachers was about as deadly as the River Styx” (154). This hyperbolic joke becomes literal in the story’s closing pages: The General sees the line of black-robed graduates as a procession of angels bearing him to his death. He believes there is a hole in his head, letting in everything he tries to keep out. Though his grip on material reality is fading at this point, in another sense he is seeing more clearly than he ever has before. He sees the battlefields of the war with all their horror, and he sees the faces of his mother, his wife, and his son. He tries to ignore the words of the commencement speaker—which are forcing him into this confrontation with reality—but they enter through the hole in his head. The music enters and shines a light on the words, helping them to take root and grow. In these final moments, the General sees the reality of his life for perhaps the first time, but this vision is not a hard-won insight. It’s one that has been “dogging all his days,” and that he has done all he could to avoid (166). In O’Connor’s fiction, reality is something one can escape only for so long.

Vanity as an Obstacle to Grace

Using free indirect style to move fluidly between Sally’s consciousness and that of her grandfather, O’Connor creates an inescapable sense of human weakness. Again and again, these characters fail to fully see themselves and each other, choosing vanity and self-delusion over clarity and compassion. Only in the final moments of his life is the General forced to confront the history he has been hiding from. This final epiphany, in which his self-flattery falls away and he sees, with grief and pity, the faces of his forgotten loved ones, represents the arrival of grace—a clarity of vision that becomes possible only after the delusional ego has been cleared away.

By moving between perspectives, the story emphasizes the vast gulf between Sally’s image of her grandfather and the man as he is. To her, he is an image of nobility and tradition. In his own thoughts, however, he comes across as superficial, arrogant, and misogynistic. He only cares about the admiration of strangers and “beautiful guls” (136). He happily allows his real identity and history to be supplanted by a false narrative in which he appears more heroic and successful than he really was.

Sally is a primary teacher who cares for her elderly grandfather. Despite these admirable actions, she too is a selfish and superficial person whose most prominent concerns are how people see her at her graduation and the shoes she wears to a film premiere. Her world revolves around her grandfather, but she knows almost nothing about him and indeed hardly speaks to him except to tell him where she wants him to be and what she wants him to wear. Like the Hollywood movie people, she uses him to embody her own romanticized myth of the southern past.

The story’s overall structure resists the kind of moral progress often found in literary fiction. The isolated and repetitive nature of the vignettes insistently punishes the characters without respite. Rather than rising, they descend into deeper and deeper degradation, until in his final moments the General is forced into a confrontation with reality. This is the “enemy” named in the title, the one he has been avoiding all his life, and the commencement speaker’s words pierce his body like bullets, as if he is dying in battle now, many decades after the war has ended.

Modernity and the Fetishization of the Past

A complex relationship between past, present, and future is at the heart of “A Late Encounter With the Enemy,” dramatized through the characters of the General, Sally, and John Wesley. The General is a relic of the past who lives entirely in the moment. Sally’s work—education—connects her to the future and to the ideal of social progress, yet while Sally attends college, she pointedly does not apply the principles she learns. Similarly, graduation, which ought to mark the beginning of a new chapter of her life, is for Sally entirely about the past; she only cares about people seeing her grandfather, who for her represents the traditional “ways of decent living” that “upstarts” like the college faculty seek to undermine (135). John Wesley’s youth and love of Coca-Cola link him to modernity, but his status as a Boy Scout associates him with tradition. Moreover, in these characters’ shifting relationships to time, it is unclear where (if anywhere) the story finds its ethical center: O'Connor depicts both the consumer culture of the narrative present and the romanticized Civil War past in unflattering terms.   

In fact, the two are interrelated, and this is key to the story’s depiction of human history. The story repeatedly shows the past that Sally fetishizes to be false. Far from being cultured or moral, as Sally’s emphasis on “decency” implies, the General is a boorish man who cracks jokes about sleeping with “beautiful guls” and constantly swears at his granddaughter. Even more tellingly, he cannot remember the very events he symbolizes: “He heard the words Chickamauga, Shiloh, Johnston, Lee, and he knew he was inspiring all these words that meant nothing to him” (142). The hollowness of the General’s glorious past does not matter at all to the industry agents who package him as a Confederate hero to market their film. In fact, the premiere merely compounds the falseness of this persona; the announcer gets his name and title wrong (probably on purpose), which is how someone the narrator describes as “probably […] a foot soldier” ends up being known as “General Sash” (135).

By glamorizing the Confederacy (the usherettes at the premier wear “short skirts” and “Confederate caps”), the story thus depicts the “new” South as coterminous with the Old South. The slick, superficial world of Coca Cola and parades of Hollywood extras is merely more of the same moral bankruptcy. This lends additional weight to the speech given at Sally’s graduation—specifically, the warning, “If we forget our past […] we won’t remember our future and it will be as well for we won’t have one” (142). In a sense, O’Connor depicts a world in which this has already happened. Though Southern society obsessively commemorates the past, its vision of the past never existed, resulting in a vacuous, amoral present.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text