47 pages • 1 hour read
Chelsea G. SummersA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
A Certain Hunger divides love into several categories: physical love, romantic love, love of food (writing, other appetites), and love of self. In Dorothy’s case, each form of love is taken to extremes, except her romantic stint with the man she actually falls in love with.
Her descriptions of love alternate between scorn, bemusement, bewilderment, and boredom. She writes, “It’s an unreadable mess” (13). She represents love as a complicating factor in life that morphs from doodles in the margins to the heights of an epic, if confusing and unresolvable, story. In essence, love is something she does not want or feel that she needs, and she perhaps only finds some form of it with Emma because they are both women resisting a stereotypical life. As such, they understand each other.
Ultimately, true romantic love is something that Dorothy finds and then rejects. Love, via her rejection of Andrew, is a symbol of her commitment to herself and her appetites. Romantic love symbolizes a facet of humanity that Dorothy thought she could not experience. When she does find it, she dismisses it as a threat to her identity.
Early in Dorothy’s prison stay, the inmates lose their writing privilege. After she receives her pens, she writes, “I tolerate humanity's crush in order to be allowed to write. I behave beautifully so that I have paper, pens, and occasional access to a computer. I suffer for my art” (21). It is immediately clear that she has a high opinion of her writing, believing that other people—humanity’s crush—are beneath her and that depriving such a being of her art is inhumane.
Writing is a representation of Dorothy’s methodical nature. Dorothy enjoys treating her murders and meals—the ones that are not impulsive—as games requiring extensive preparation and risk management. Writing a book-length story, whether it is a memoir or a novel, is also a type of game, a puzzle that challenges the author to test the limits of their reasoning and arguments.
She refers to her writing as her art, but it is really a record of her selfishness and the means by which she enriched herself. It also allows her to leave a record and to tell her story on her own terms. Writing is also an act of self-centeredness for Dorothy in this way. It allows her to grow and maintain an audience even while confined in prison. Ironically, Dorothy writes with real passion and is considered talented. She takes pride in her writing and has a disdain for sloppy prose and craftsmanship.
Because Dorothy is a writer, her mixed first- and second-person narration allows the author to indulge in decadent, flowery prose as a strategy to characterize Dorothy’s need to show off. There is a distinct impression that Dorothy writes to impress herself, as well as the reader. She also manages to characterize writing as a symbol of violence, very much in keeping with her character: “In life as in writing, you kill your darlings. You kill, anyway, and then you see what you can take with you” (171).
Alex is the man that Dorothy legitimately falls in love with. Most significantly in terms of Dorothy’s characterization, Alex symbolizes the fact that she is capable of love—at least, she believes so. When she meets him, he is so genuine that she doesn’t assume that he is hitting on her: “He seemed too innocent, too cherubic, too earnest for carefree fucking” (231). Alex represents a man that could be something more than a sexual partner for Dorothy, which she thought was impossible.
Alex allows Dorothy to step outside of her appetites and narcissism. She writes of his transforming effect: “I became we, and Alex grew closer. He wore me like a second skin, and I was fine with it” (235). Alex shows Dorothy that she has a heart that has functions beyond perpetuating her existence.
Alex symbolizes the fact that Dorothy is capable of a more traditional relationship than what she has had but also that a stable relationship is not what she truly wants. Alex represents the contentment of undramatic domesticity. He symbolizes the predictable tedium of goodness. Dorothy is capable of a dramatic hedonism that most people are not. She almost feels that accepting Alex’s marriage proposal would be to squander the core tenets of her identity. Her rejection of his proposal represents her rejection of normalcy or even its pretense.