61 pages • 2 hours read
Roberto BolanoA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Benno von Archimboldi is the pen name of Hans Reiter, a German man born in 1920 who fought in World War II. His life can be divided into two broad eras, as signified by the name most associated with him during this time. In the first part of his life, he is Hans Reiter. Once he begins to write and comes to terms with the trauma of the world around him, he eases into the vagueness of the Archimboldi identity. While the critics attempt to understand anything at all about Archimboldi, they fail because they do not know anything about Hans Reiter. The trauma of Hans Reiter’s life is essential to understanding the character of Archimboldi. Hans is a tall man who never quite fits into the world around him. Physically, intellectually, and emotionally, he felt alienated from a rapidly changing Germany. Though he fought alongside the Nazis, he never had any real ideological commitment to the Nazi cause. One of his only sincere emotions is the fear that he killed Ansky, the Jewish Russian man whose papers become an obsession for Hans. When he is told a story by a man who executed hundreds of Jews, Hans quietly strangles him. The chaos, the suffering, and the confusion of the war leave Hans Reiter even more alienated from the world. When he writes, this alienation continues. He feels averse to literary circles, and he rejects involvement in the literary scene of postwar Germany. When Ingeborg dies, Hans decides to abandon his old self forever. The prose mirrors this, almost exclusively referring to him by his pseudonym once he had decided to leave his past behind.
The character of Archimboldi is a deliberately vague creation. Hans’s alienation from the world imbues him with a distaste for others. He is deliberately alone, rather than lonely, and he strives to preserve this coveted isolation. Even when he speaks to Mr. Bubis, his potential publisher, he refuses to divulge his real name. Only the people with a genuine connection to his past—Mrs. Bubis, Lotte—are given the privilege of knowing the name of Hans Reiter. For everyone else, there is only Archimboldi. As such, the vagueness of Archimboldi—a writer for whom an entire school of academics obsesses over his anonymity—is a shield. By refusing to reveal anything about himself, Hans can lose himself inside his own creation. His bibliography is made up of a long list of novels, but his greatest creation is Archimboldi himself. Through the character of Archimboldi, Hans can lose himself in a society he does not understand. He severs all ties to the world around him and focuses only on his work. Any Hunger for Meaning in Life that he once felt is satisfied through these novels and the continued anonymity of Archimboldi. Through Archimboldi, Hans writes himself a world in which he is no one.
Hans Reiter can thus only be understood as a synthesis of two identities. There is no Archimboldi without Hans, but Hans without Archimboldi is half a person, someone for whom decades are little more than black space on the page. Mrs. Bubis (who is also in possession of dual identities, referred to frequently as the Baroness von Zumpe) understands the synthesis of Hans and his creation. After reading a passage from one of Archimboldi’s novels, Lotte also recognizes her brother. Lotte’s understanding is the closest to any true understanding of Archimboldi and Hans Reiter: the synthesis of the past and the present into a single, holistic identity. Only these two people are given the privilege of knowing the real Hans Reiter.
Like his uncle, Hans Reiter, Klaus Haas appears across several parts of the novel. He is a unifying thread but in a very different way. Whereas the work of Archimboldi and the life of Hans Reiter are generally positive, the existence of Klaus Haas is broadly negative. Though he physically resembles his uncle, he possesses none of his uncle’s artistic sensibilities or emotional sensitivities. Whereas Hans embraces his anonymity, Klaus embraces his notoriety. He calls press conferences to discuss the murders in Santa Teresa; he delights in speaking about and witnessing violence in prison. Whereas Hans craves anonymity to the point that he creates an entirely new identity for himself, Klaus embraces his status as a public figure. He uses his pulpit to level unfounded accusations against the Mexican elite. Since his trial is constantly postponed, his actual guilt is uncertain. He is incarcerated for most of the novel, yet the murders continue. In effect, Klaus’s guilt is irrelevant. As Sergio suggests when leaving a meeting with Klaus, his general aura of evil suggests that he is certainly guilty of something. He has a long history of sex offenses across many countries. As such, Klaus and Hans exist as natural counterpoints to one another. They represent the nuanced complexities of a dichotomy like good and evil. They are public and private, famous and anonymous, guilty and innocent.
Klaus and Hans may be diametrically opposed, but Klaus is as much a product of the old-world evil as his uncle. Hans came into being during the rise to power of the Nazis. He fought for the Nazis, even if he ultimately rejected their ideology. Klaus is born and raised in the postwar world, a society in which the fate of the Nazis has already been determined and German society is relearning itself. Hans does not fit into this rebuilding process. He leaves Germany at the first available opportunity and—in another parallel to the life of his uncle—he loses himself in a new country, losing contact with his old friends and family. In America, Klaus finds a more fitting environment. He becomes an American citizen, bureaucratically and legally aligning himself with the New World. He commits crimes, then crosses the border into Mexico where (at least according to the authorities) he is responsible for many murders. Klaus represents the Hidden Evil Within Society. This evil is not limited to a time, a place, or a single country. Klaus eludes narrative interrogation in the novel; his words are always slippery and artificial, to the point where the reader (like the Mexican authorities) can never be truly sure of his guilt. In this way, Klaus represents the ubiquitous and hidden evil of the world.
Despite his general aura of evil, however, Klaus is responsible for one of the novel’s most positive moments of reconciliation. After a long separation from her son, Lotte learns that he is alive in a Mexican prison. She makes annual trips to Mexico, learning Spanish to better understand her son’s fate. On her travels, she happens to pick up a book by Archimboldi and, as a result, she is reunited with her long-lost brother. Quite accidentally, Klaus’s crimes have caused the reunion of brother and sister. They meet again when they are very old, by which time decades have been spent apart. This fleeting reunion, depicted across a few paragraphs in the closing pages of the novel, is a positive counterpoint to the depiction of violence, war, and suffering. Ironically, the killer Klaus has brought happiness back into his mother’s life. Klaus’s role in the reunion alludes to the general chaotic unpredictability of society, as depicted in the novel. Even from something as destructive and as evil as Klaus, something positive can emerge.
Oscar Fate is one of the few American characters in 2666. More specifically, he is a Black American man. Fate’s identity as a Black man in America informs everything he does. He works for a magazine that is written for Black men in America and, as his editor reminds him, the stories he writes should appeal to Black Americans. Over the course of his part of the novel, Fate’s identity is continually challenged. His story begins with the death of his mother, severing the only apart family tie he has, leaving him with the ghostly memory of his ancestors which gradually fades from relevancy. Next, he interviews someone with a much firmer and much more active racial identity. The interview with Barry Seaman prompts Fate to think about how he sees himself as a Black American man and whether he is any more or less Black than the subjects of his stories. Then, he is asked to temporarily become a sports journalist. In the space of a few days, Fate has his family, racial, and professional identities challenged. He crosses the border into Mexico amid an identity crisis, though still clinging to his identity as a Black American journalist.
In Mexico, Fate finds that he is someone else. In America, he is seen by other people as a Black American. He understands himself in a racial context, to the point where other people’s treatment of him due to his ethnicity informs his behavior and his identity. To Mexicans, however, he is just an American. Though his skin is still Black, a defining element of his identity on the other side of the border, Fate is allowed to simply be an American for the first time. In a different society, he is seen as someone else. He is still an outsider since he is an American in Mexico, but he is not an outsider in his own country. He is not an outsider due to the color of his skin. For Fate, this prompts a confusing disintegration of identity. He asks himself who he really is and what he is really doing, all as he continues to perform the role of sports journalist that he has been assigned. As a Black American man in Mexico, Fate struggles to simply be an American for the first time in his life.
Fate gradually wrestles control of the shifting, unreliable nature of reality in Mexico. Beyond the border, in a world where he does not speak the local language, where his actions are affected by alcohol misuse and the proximity of murder and violence, Fate begins to perform. He is not a sports journalist, but he plays the role. As he begins to question his status as a Black American man, he begins to play the role expected of him. He realizes that many Mexicans’ idea of American culture is informed by movies, particularly Charley Cruz’s library of DVDs and VHS tapes. When he decides to rescue Rosa, Fate embraces the shifting nature of identity in this strange land. He adopts the persona of a Black man, as informed by the movies in Cruz’s collection. He rescues Rosa from the potentially dangerous situation and, after meeting her father, he is entrusted with taking her across the border. Ironically, Fate’s loss of identity leads to the creation of a new identity. He performs the role of a hero, and, through his performance, he turns himself into a heroic figure. Fate’s fate is to illustrate the complicated relationship between reality, identity, and performance, where nothing is quite certain beyond the immediate actions of the present.
Óscar Amalfitano is a Chilean college professor who teaches in Santa Teresa. While living in Barcelona, he had a daughter named Rosa with a woman named Lola, who eventually left him. Amalfitano raised Rosa by himself and, after the departure of his wife, sank into a gradual, heavy form of alienation. By the time the critics meet him in Santa Teresa, he has totally succumbed to this alienation. They view him as unremarkable and uninteresting, not knowing the extent to which he has been affected by the world around him. Amalfitano seems broadly aware of this alienation. Almost unconsciously, he searches out new ways in which to engage with the world around him. He becomes obsessed with a geometry book but reading the book is not enough. He pins it to the clothesline in the yard, hoping to observe how nature interacts with the book. Nature will read the book, he decides, and he will read nature. The critics are still stuck in the old ways of the world, reading books in the traditional way to better understand Archimboldi. Amalfitano seems strange to them because his methods have moved beyond the traditional boundaries of Literary Criticism as a Mode of Understanding Interpersonal Relationships in a desperate attempt to reengage with the world.
Amalfitano does not find comfort in books or experiments. Instead, he realizes that Rosa is the most important presence in his life. Amalfitano is a man who has crossed many continents. He has left behind the violence in Chile and the martial disintegration in Europe to find himself in North America, unexpectedly teaching at a Mexican university in a city where he is worried for his daughter’s safety. He has lost a wife and, when he begins to hear voices in his head, he begins to fear that he is losing his grip on his sanity. At the end of the story of Oscar Fate, Rosa comes to him in a desperate moment. She is scared for her life, and the intensity of her fear jolts Amalfitano out of his numbed, alienated state. His life is suddenly clarified: Rosa, the girl he raised himself, is in danger. He acts with a speed and a certainty that he has missed for many years, giving Rosa the resources needed to get back to Barcelona. He gives her money and offers to distract anyone who might be following them. Amalfitano is sacrificing himself—financially and physically—to ensure that his daughter is safe, accepting that her survival is more important to him than any pleasure he derives from her proximity. Amalfitano never comes to any academic conclusion about his problems. He does not solve his situation with philosophy or experiments. He realizes the immediacy and the importance of sincere human interaction, choosing to save his daughter at any expense to give meaning to his life.
Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Good & Evil
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Hispanic & Latinx American Literature
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
National Book Critics Circle Award...
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Pride & Shame
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
The Past
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
War
View Collection